Critics’ reviews

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

9 reviews from 9 publications. An early critics’ score of 84 from 5 reviews; it stands on its own from 6.

Back to our review of A Nightmare on Elm Street

84
Positive
5
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Slant Magazine
25 September 2006 · Nick Schager
80*

The film is a landmark for its surreal atmosphere and iconic villain but also helped usher in an era of campy, pun-filled horror sequels. Craven excels at blending sexualized imagery with dream logic and parental guilt themes.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 October 2024
80*

The critic calls the 1984 film an ingenious and jauntily outrageous shocker that upends the idea of being kept awake by fear. They highlight its cheerfully crass black-comic energy and the film debut of Johnny Depp.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Simon Braund

The film revitalized the fading teen slasher genre with its premise of a killer invading dreams. It singles out the iconic creation of Freddy Krueger and memorable nightmare sequences like the blood geyser from the bed for praise, while noting a somewhat weak finale.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 November 1984 · Vincent Canby

The film is a slick, effective horror entry that merges teen nightmares with reality through inventive special effects. Canby notes the emphasis on bizarre visuals over graphic gore from Craven's earlier work.

Read the full review →
Time Out
22 September 2013 · NRo

The critic finds the film good scary fun despite the later franchise overshadowing it, praising the genuinely frightening dream sequences and throwaway black humour while noting the subtext wanders.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1984 · Variety Staff

A highly imaginative horror film that delivers the shocks expected by genre fans, with original special effects that effectively blend dreams and reality. Craven merges the elements tantalizingly but does not fully resolve the thematic threads at the end.

Read the full review →
Collider
27 October 2022 · A · Rae Torres
95

The critic praises the film's innovative premise of a killer invading dreams and Robert Englund's mesmerizing, gleeful performance as Freddy Krueger, which revitalized the slasher genre. It notes the iconic visuals and Nancy as a strong final girl but observes that campy elements and dated effects make it less scary for modern viewers, though still a classic.

Read the full review →
Paste
26 September 2019 · Jim Vorel
90*

The critic singles out the film's fresh approach to the slasher genre through Freddy's supernatural dream-based attacks and rich backstory, which allowed for inventive and disturbing set pieces. It calls the original the purest and scariest version, crediting Craven for disrupting stale tropes with a new iconic villain.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
5 September 2014 · James Gracey
80*

The critic praises the film's atmospheric and unsettling quality, highlighting its surreal dream sequences and the primal fear of sleep. They note it stands out from typical slashers with rich concepts and haunting ideas, though Freddy becomes clownish in sequels.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate