Critics’ reviews

A Passage to India (1984)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 74: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of A Passage to India

74
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics admire it, and the admiration settles on the same things: David Lean’s unhurried, orderly direction, the scale and finish of the production, and a cast that draws praise almost everywhere. Judy Davis as Adela Quested and Peggy Ashcroft are the names that recur, with Victor Banerjee’s Aziz close behind. The photography of the Indian settings is singled out repeatedly, as is the film’s closeness to Forster’s book and its eye for the small cruelties of the British officials.

The reservations gather around pace and temperature. Several reviews find it languorous, and one argues the narrative loses its footing after the courtroom scenes. Time Out thinks Lean softens the novel’s attack on empire, and Empire, the one clear dissenter, finds the whole thing remote and unmoving despite its gloss, crediting only Ashcroft with giving it a heart. The spread is wide, from full marks to plain disappointment.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

David Lean's final feature is a stately epic that exposes the tensions and prejudices of imperialism with a sharp satirical edge. The director's powers are undiminished in this lusciously photographed picture, with standout performances including Judy Davis as the impulsive Adela Quested.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 December 1984 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert calls it one of the greatest screen adaptations ever made of a major novel. He praises Lean's beautiful, modulated direction and the way the film captures the characters' failures of connection.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
16 April 2008 · A- · Noel Murray
90

The critic notes that while Lean's adaptation literalizes the novel's themes and shows some of his own prejudices, his old-world sensibility and meticulous design make the film effective, though not as brilliant as his earlier epics.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
7 January 1985 · Pauline Kael
75*

Kael calls the film an admirable, orderly and dignified piece of work with virtuoso steadiness in its first half. She praises its capture of the British officials' cruelty but notes it loses narrative flow after the courtroom scenes.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 December 1984 · Critic’s Pick · Vincent Canby
70*

Canby finds Lean's version respectful and handsome, his best work since Lawrence of Arabia, and humane. He singles out the vivid characters and strong performances, especially Victor Banerjee as Aziz.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1984
70*

The review finds Lean's adaptation impeccably faithful, beautifully played and occasionally languorous. It praises the performances, especially Peggy Ashcroft and Judy Davis, and Lean's success in capturing Forster's tone of irony.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 May 2011 · CPea
60*

Lean's adaptation is a curiously modest affair that sticks closely to the book's incidents but softens its critique of British imperialism. It features Lean's strongest cast in years, particularly Judy Davis, and showcases his skill with grand scenery and scale.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 July 2006 · Ian Nathan
40*

The film is a disappointment after David Lean's long absence, remaining strangely remote and unmoving despite its glossy Raj setting and elegant direction. It singles out Peggy Ashcroft's stoic performance for giving the film a heart, while noting vivid shots of elephant parades and the Marabar Caves.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate