Critics’ reviews

A Royal Affair (2012)

17 reviews from 17 publications. Critics’ score 67: 9 positive, 7 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of A Royal Affair

67
Positive
9
Mixed
7
Negative
1

Most critics like A Royal Affair well enough, and the praise lands almost entirely on the acting. Mikkel Boe Følsgaard’s king is the performance named most often, for making a lonely, half-mad man both menacing and sympathetic; Mads Mikkelsen’s restraint and Alicia Vikander’s intensity are close behind. The reviews agree the film is handsome, intelligently made and subtler than the usual heritage drama, with the court politics and Enlightenment reforms carrying real weight.

The reservations cluster on the romance. Several critics find the affair at the centre less convincing than the intrigue around it: Variety thinks the love story and the political thriller never quite balance, Slant calls the romance unconvincing, and the Los Angeles Times finds the whole thing earnest and a little bloodless. The spread is narrow, running from warm to lukewarm, with only The Guardian negative, faulting the barely simmering chemistry between the leads and a film it finds dour and short on passion.

The Hollywood Reporter
16 February 2012 · festival review · David Rooney
85*

Rooney finds the film an engrossing, elegantly told historical drama, despite some plot density near its conclusion. He particularly praises the compelling performances of its three central actors.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
8 November 2012 · B+ · Sam Adams
83

Adams finds the film nimble despite a romance that is not especially gripping and a debate whose resolution becomes too predictable. He praises Mads Mikkelsen’s expressive performance and Alicia Vikander’s anguished intensity, while singling out newcomer Mikkel Boe Følsgaard’s layered portrayal of the king.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 May 2012 · Anna Smith
75*

Smith finds the film highly entertaining and educational despite its length and neglected peripheral characters. She praises the performances, especially Mikkel Boe Følsgaard’s humorous King Christian and Alicia Vikander’s luminous Queen Caroline.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
6 October 2012 · The Standard
70*

The review finds the Danish period drama subtler than many heritage films, despite its familiar television-drama look. It praises the panache of the performances and the complexity of the characterisation.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Jonathan Robbins
70*

The standfirst presents the film positively as a sweeping costume drama. It singles out Mads Mikkelsen for stealing the show.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint could be verified.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
17 February 2012 · festival review · Mike Goodridge
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its verdict is not visible in the accessible text. No specific praise or complaint can be established from the available content.

Read the full review →
Time Out
12 June 2012 · ★★★ · Cath Clarke
60

The page identifies this as a review, but provides no review text from which to determine the critic’s verdict. No specific praise or complaint is available in the supplied page content.

Read the full review →
Total Film
13 June 2012 · ★★★ · Ellen E
60

Arcel gives the scandal a traditional treatment while aiming for modern emotional immediacy. Mikkel Boe Folsgaard’s performance as the king stands out for balancing menace with sympathy.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
8 November 2012 · Kenneth Turan
55*

Turan finds the film polished and intelligently restrained, but overly earnest and somewhat bloodless. He singles out Mikkel Boe Følsgaard’s unexpectedly affecting portrayal of the lonely, naive king.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 February 2012 · festival review · Alissa Simon
55*

Simon finds the historical drama handsome but uneven, with its love story and political thriller elements not always balanced. She singles out the court intrigues and the mad king’s escapades as more compelling than the romance, while praising the Czech locations and cinematography.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
3 November 2012 · ★★/4 · Andrew Schenker
50

Schenker finds the period drama staid and its central romance unconvincing. He praises the more complex portrayal of the half-mad king and the moments when Enlightenment reforms challenge the royal council.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 June 2012 · Henry Barnes
40*

Barnes finds the period drama confident but dour, and says it ultimately lacks passion. He particularly faults the barely simmering chemistry between Struensee and Caroline Mathilde.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
8 November 2012
85*

The critic calls it a compelling, terrific costume drama and an intimate love story. They praise the performances of Mads Mikkelsen, Alicia Vikander, and Mikkel Boe Følsgaard for bringing its central trio to life.

Read the full review →
Paste
13 November 2012 · 7.8 · Annlee Ellingson
78*

Ellingson finds the film nuanced and compelling, with its romance inseparable from political upheaval. She praises Arcel’s deft interweaving of the love story and the reforms, while noting the slow build.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
17 February 2012 · B · The Playlist Staff
77

The critic finds the film handsome and well-acted but too conventional to be especially challenging. Mads Mikkelsen’s subtle performance is singled out for elevating the familiar period drama.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
14 December 2012 · Jennie Kermode
75*

Kermode finds the film a sophisticated, politically engaged romance that offers plenty for viewers seeking love and history. She especially praises the sensitive portrayal of Christian, while noting that Vikander struggles to convey Caroline’s intellectual brilliance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate