Critics’ reviews

A Scanner Darkly (2006)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 69: 7 positive, 5 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of A Scanner Darkly

69
Positive
7
Mixed
5
Negative
1

Most critics come down in favour of A Scanner Darkly, with reservations. The praise clusters on Linklater’s rotoscoped animation, which nearly every review names as the film’s chief achievement: it brings the scramble suit and the hallucinations to life and exposes the ordinary sadness underneath the paranoia. There is broad agreement that this is an unusually faithful adaptation of Philip K. Dick, and the cast’s handling of the strung-out junkie dialogue draws warm notices, Robert Downey Jr. in particular.

The reservations gather around pace and talk. Several critics find the film slow and dialogue-heavy, and warn that anyone unfamiliar with Dick may struggle. Variety goes furthest, calling it overly faithful and a missed opportunity, and complaining that the animation flattens the actors’ faces. Slant thinks Linklater never quite catches the novel’s comic nightmare. The spread is wide, from that lone negative to a handful of admirers who find it gripping and moving, but the centre of opinion is a qualified yes.

Los Angeles Times
7 July 2006 · Carina Chocano
80*

Chocano gives the film a clearly positive verdict, calling its central achievement brilliant. She particularly praises how Linklater’s rotoscoping and understated approach make its paranoid world feel connected to reality.

Read the full review →
Total Film
18 August 2006 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review finds the film darkly comic, unsettling and unusually respectful of Philip K. Dick’s work. It particularly praises the visually astonishing rotoscoping and Robert Downey Jr.’s energetic performance.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
29 June 2006 · ★★★/4 · Jeremiah Kipp
75

Kipp finds the film only partly successful, saying Linklater does not fully capture the novel’s comic nightmare. He praises its vivid depiction of addicts and its portrayal of Generation X’s failed intimacy.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 July 2006 · Kim Newman
70*

Newman finds the film intelligent and near-essential, though its dizzying moments create an overall downbeat effect. He praises Linklater’s faithful, skilful adaptation and the cast’s handling of the funny, unsettling junkie dialogue.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
19 January 2007 · Rob Mackie
70*

Mackie finds the film an effective, obscurely funny adaptation, though its strung-out dialogue and limited action may not suit viewers unfamiliar with Dick’s work. He praises Linklater’s animation for bringing the scramble suit vividly to life.

Read the full review →
The Independent
17 August 2006 · Robert Hanks
65*

Hanks finds the film flawed but absorbing, recommending it for its atmosphere rather than its stars, story, or philosophical ideas. He praises Linklater’s rotoscoped visuals for revealing the ordinary sadness and fear beneath the paranoia.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
26 May 2006 · Lee Marshall
64*

Marshall frames the film as a sci-fi slacker movie, returning to Linklater’s animation technique from Waking Life. The accessible text ends before his verdict or any specific praise or complaint is clear.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
13 July 2006
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint from the review could be confirmed.

Read the full review →
Time Out
14 August 2006 · Ben Walters
64*

The accessible page identifies this as Walters’s review, but the critic’s verdict is not available in the supplied text. The visible description begins with a character’s claim about hidden processes behind reality, without revealing what Walters praises or faults.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Dave Aldridge
60

The three-star assessment suggests an interesting adaptation, though not an unequivocal success. It singles out Linklater’s distinctive interpolated-rotoscoping visual approach.

Read the full review →
Variety
25 May 2006 · festival review · Justin Chang
40*

Chang finds the adaptation intriguing but overly faithful and talky, ultimately a missed opportunity rather than a visionary film. He praises the rotoscoped hallucination and scramble suit, while noting that the animation flattens the actors’ faces.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
7 September 2006 · Jennie Kermode
95*

Kermode calls the film brilliant, disorientating, gripping and emotionally powerful, while noting that its slow build and complex storyline may challenge some viewers. She praises the rotoscoped animation, finely judged dialogue and performances for making the damaged characters compelling and deserving of empathy.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
5 July 2010 · 4 out of 5 · Ryan Lambie
90*

Lambie praises the film as a faithful, moving adaptation and calls Blu-ray its perfect home. He singles out the rotoscoped visuals and the disc’s vivid, sharply defined colors.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate