Critics’ reviews

A Streetcar Named Desire (1951)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 79: 11 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of A Streetcar Named Desire

79
Positive
11
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Los Angeles Times
26 September 1993 · Kenneth Turan
90*

Turan hails the restored film as a landmark of American cinema and ensemble acting, praising how the recovered footage adds a more openly sensual tone and allows full appreciation of Brando, Leigh, Hunter, and Malden's performances.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
12 November 1993 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert praises the 1993 restoration for revealing the full daring of Kazan's original cut and highlights Brando's raw, influential performance as Stanley as the standout element that shaped modern screen acting.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
18 April 2012 · Noel Murray
90*

The critic notes that despite censorship of its racier elements, the film still seethes with lust and retains much of Williams’ florid dialogue. Brando’s revelatory performance and the balance of naturalism with expressionism allow the movie to feel both exaggerated and true, offering what Blanche calls magic as well as realism.

Read the full review →
Variety
20 June 1951 · Variety Staff
90*

The review calls the film an absorbing adult drama of frustration and tragedy, commending the excellent production values, Kazan's direction, and the compelling performances by Leigh, Brando, Hunter, and Malden.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
85*

Kazan adapted Williams' play for the screen with some changes to the ending, but kept the rape scene. Brando and Leigh deliver epic, atmospheric performances in a seedy New Orleans setting.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 February 2020 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

The critic finds the toxic chemistry between Vivien Leigh and Marlon Brando compelling but notes Leigh's mannered performance goes too far into paranoia too quickly. Kazan controls the tense final scenes effectively in this re-release of the 1951 classic.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
22 September 1951 · John McCarten
70*

McCarten commends the faithful screen adaptation of Williams' play and the strong ensemble acting, especially Brando and Leigh, while complaining that the stage-bound setting and closeups make it less powerful than the original theatrical version.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 September 1993
70*

The piece discusses the restoration of censored footage from the 1951 film, noting how the added elements intensify Blanche's sexual history and the rape scene while underscoring the original controversy over its content.

Read the full review →
The Times
7 February 2020 · ★★★★☆ · Ed Potton
70*

The film marks a changing of the guard with Brando's star-making performance as Stanley, while Kazan's close-ups capture the play's intensity despite some screen adaptations and censorship.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 November 2008 · 3 out of 5 stars · David Jenkins
50*

The critic finds Kazan’s adaptation stirring but over-polite in its handling of the source material’s intensity. Brando’s hyper-realist performance as Stanley stands out amid an uneven cast and direction that simmers rather than boils.

Read the full review →
Collider
18 May 2012 · Andre Dellamorte
90*

The critic finds that Marlon Brando's intense, method-acting performance as Stanley Kowalski overwhelms and elevates the film despite Vivien Leigh's strong work as Blanche DuBois. Brando's raw, naturalistic style, captured under Elia Kazan's direction, marks a turning point in American screen acting.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 November 2008 · Jennie Kermode
90*

The critic praises how the film sustains tension between Blanche and Stanley through Tennessee Williams' writing and the lead performances, with Kazan gradually shrinking the set to heighten pressure. It is hailed as one of the finest pieces of cinema for its bold exploration of clashing worlds and human nature.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate