Critics’ reviews

Ace Ventura: Pet Detective (1994)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 37: 1 positive, 2 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Ace Ventura: Pet Detective

37
Positive
1
Mixed
2
Negative
5

Most critics do not think much of it. Five of the eight reviews are negative and only one is positive, and the verdict that recurs is that Jim Carrey’s performance is far more energetic than the film around it. Nearly everyone grants him that energy; several remark on how manic he is, and the Los Angeles Times finds it produces real, if unexpected, laughs alongside the hero’s odd tenderness towards animals.

Where the reviews part is over whether the energy is enough. The 1994 notices mostly complain that there are too few gags for the running time and that the plotting has the attention span of a small child. The third-act twist is the other sticking point: Variety objects to it at the time, and later reviews from Vulture and Slant make it the central charge, describing it as openly homophobic and transphobic. The spread is wide, but heavily weighted towards the bottom.

Los Angeles Times
4 February 1994 · Chris Willman
70*

Willman finds the film uneven but capable of inducing unexpected giggles through Carrey's over-the-top, inhuman energy. He praises the hero's childlike bond with animals amid the farce.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 February 1994
50*

The review notes the film is briskly paced with Carrey's energy but has too few gags to sustain its length. It criticizes the third-act payoff for veering into homophobia and misogyny.

Read the full review →
Vulture
15 August 2013
45*

The critic views the film as a cultural touchstone for its quotable catchphrases and toilet humor that defined early 90s tween comedy, while acknowledging its noxious transphobia and homophobia in the central twist and reactions.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 February 1994 · Stephen Holden
40*

Holden describes Jim Carrey's hyperactive performance as one of the most energetic on screen but likens the film to the logic and attention span of a peevish child. He notes its focus on silly asides over plot.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Julian Ketchum
30*

The film is a private detective spoof marking Jim Carrey's feature debut, with Carrey playing an animal specialist who tracks a missing dolphin mascot. The plot is absurd but the gags are mostly inane and fail to sustain the runtime.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
4 February 1994 · Roger Ebert
20*

Ebert views the film as an unfunny slog centered on one joke about Ace Ventura's weird nerdiness. He notes it might appeal only to very young children.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
31 January 2014 · R. Kurt Osenlund
20*

The critic finds the film shockingly offensive in its homophobia and transphobia, as well as its insensitivity toward mental illness and animal captivity, arguing the big twist and climax amount to militant contempt for LGBT people that could not be made today.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · NKe
20*

The critic outlines the plot of the bumbling sleuth tracking a stolen dolphin and uncovering a scheme, noting Jim Carrey's manic style was familiar and appealing to US audiences from his TV work. It is dismissed as a Naked Gun rip-off and desperate stuff.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate