Critics’ reviews

Aguirre, the Wrath of God (1972)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 89: 13 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Aguirre, the Wrath of God

89
Positive
13
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are unanimously positive, with praise clustering around Klaus Kinski’s feverish performance and Werner Herzog’s use of the Amazon landscape. Critics repeatedly describe the expedition’s madness through the physical force of the locations: the river and jungle make the conquistadors’ ambitions look puny. Kinski’s portrayal of deluded authority is the other constant, giving the film’s treatment of greed and colonial power a disturbing human focus. The Playlist also singles out Popol Vuh’s haunting score.

The spread runs from approval to outright celebration, rather than revealing a substantive critical divide. The Independent and RogerEbert.com offer the more restrained assessments, but both still praise Kinski, with the latter also stressing the river journey’s physical reality. No clear reservation recurs across the supplied reviews; differences lie chiefly in how much attention critics give to imperial folly, oppressive atmosphere or the rawness of filming on location.

Little White Lies
7 June 2013 · 5/5/4 · David Jenkins
100

This 1972 masterpiece returns to the big screen as a cause for major celebration and one of the true greats, an adventure saga about the ultimate futility of existence. Kinski’s performance is teleported from the silent era in its intensity.

Read the full review →
Time Out
4 June 2013 · ★★★★★ · Cath Clarke
100

Werner Herzog’s mad masterpiece from 1972 still has its hallucinatory charge and is an awesome feat of filmmaking. Watch it for Kinski’s performance and a succession of haunting images.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2012 · Ian Nathan
90*

Herzog's film is a masterful study of madness, greed, and man's futile conflict with the Amazon jungle, sparked by the nightmarish production involving Klaus Kinski. The director captures nature as a vast, destructive force that reduces the conquistadors to insignificance.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
7 June 2013
90*

This re-release of Herzog's 1972 classic depicts a 1560s Spanish expedition to El Dorado that descends into madness. The film powerfully merges landscapes and characters in a way that makes it unforgettable.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
25 March 2016
90*

Herzog’s hypnotic film is a fevered descent into madness and myth, blending hallucinatory Romanticism with Brechtian realism as a haunting allegory of imperialist ruin. It remains unrivalled in its evocation of colonial avarice and folly.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 June 2013 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic praises the restored 1972 film as one of the great folies de grandeur of 1970s cinema, a Conradian nightmare of colonial madness. Kinski's performance as the paranoid, visionary conquistador is singled out as that of a natural-born tyrant whose delusions drive the expedition.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
4 April 1977 · Penelope Gilliatt
90*

Herzog has made a mesmerizing film about blasphemous power and a mad invader driven by delusions of empire. It singles out the visual style and the oppressive atmosphere created by unseen enemies for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1972 · Variety Staff
90*

Herzog has created a rivetingly shot odyssey and parable on the human need for power. It singles out the larger-than-life acting, especially by Klaus Kinski, and the exciting visuals for praise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
9 February 1977 · Roger Ebert
70*

The film is one of Herzog's most accessible and horrifying works, an obsessive story of a doomed 16th-century expedition driven by greed and madness. It singles out the intense performance by Klaus Kinski and the physical reality of the river journey for praise.

Read the full review →
The Independent
6 June 2013
70*

Werner Herzog's 1972 film follows Spanish conquistadors on a doomed jungle trek for El Dorado while descending into hallucinatory strangeness. Klaus Kinski's mad-eyed performance as the title character stands out as particularly unhinged and memorable.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
7 June 2013 · ★★★★★ · Joe Cunningham
100

The critic celebrates the BFI re-release of this restored classic as an intoxicating vision of man disregarding nature and meeting his doom. They single out the visceral quality of filming deep in the Amazon jungle and Kinski's feverish performance.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
29 July 2014 · A+ · The Playlist Staff
100

The retrospective piece rates the film A+ and describes it as a meticulously captured descent into madness during an ill-fated jungle journey. It singles out Kinski's all-timer performance, the dangerous real locations, and the haunting Popol Vuh score.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
22 March 2004 · Gary Duncan
85*

The review calls the film breathtakingly visual and epic in its ambitions, with a raw documentary-like authenticity from on-location shooting. It singles out Kinski's haunting, magnetic performance as the deranged conquistador for particular praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate