Film review

Aguirre, the Wrath of God

1972 · Directed by Werner Herzog · 1h 35m · MPA NR

In a sentenceKlaus Kinski appears to believe the jungle is waiting for his instructions

HistoryAdventureDrama

During the 1560s, a Spanish expedition enters the Amazon jungle in search of El Dorado. Don Lope de Aguirre (Klaus Kinski) wants wealth and power, and the journey offers a chance to pursue both. Alongside him are Don Pedro de Ursúa (Ruy Guerra), Inés de Atienza (Helena Rojo) and Brother Gaspar de Carvajal (Del Negro). The expedition must travel through jungle and along a river that make its ambitions look increasingly impractical. Aguirre’s determination adds another danger: his belief in his own authority allows little room for the people travelling with him.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Werner Herzog’s jungle adventure is an unnerving study of greed, carried by Klaus Kinski’s frightening performance and the physical force of the river journey. The supporting characters can be thin; we would recommend it without hesitation.

Werner Herzog sends a Spanish expedition into the Amazon in search of El Dorado and gives us little reason to envy anyone on it. Aguirre, the Wrath of God is a gripping adventure about greed, with an unusual understanding of how ridiculous the greedy can look. We would tell a stranger to see it. Its 95 minutes are enough to make the journey oppressive without exhausting our interest in the people attempting it.

Cinematographer Thomas Mauch gives the jungle and river a physical presence that makes the expedition seem pitifully small. The images have the rough immediacy of footage taken by someone negotiating the same difficult ground as the people in front of the camera. The water looks dangerous in its own right; it does not need a villain placed beside it. We keep registering the effort of travelling through this place, which stops the scenery becoming a pleasant distraction.

Klaus Kinski makes Don Lope de Aguirre difficult company simply by being there. The feverish eyes and the performance’s intensity leave little space for an ordinary exchange between people. We found his stare frightening. It suggests a man so convinced of his right to command that another person’s objection would scarcely count as speech. This is large, conspicuous acting, and it works particularly well against surroundings that remain indifferent to all that furious human effort.

Beate Mainka-Jellinghaus’s editing gives the journey an uncomfortable duration: we feel the travelling as well as the danger. That matters in a film where the physical difficulty of getting anywhere must remain convincing. Popol Vuh’s music deepens the unease instead of promising the release an adventure score often supplies. It makes these already inhospitable surroundings feel stranger, without diminishing the impression that the river could hurt someone quite independently of the drama being performed upon it.

There is a cost to concentrating so much attention on Aguirre. Helena Rojo’s Inés de Atienza and Ruy Guerra’s Don Pedro de Ursúa have less room to hold our interest, though both give the expedition a necessary human presence beyond its most alarming member. Del Negro, as Brother Gaspar de Carvajal, also registers distinctly, but the people surrounding Aguirre are not always allowed much life beyond their place in the expedition. That narrowness is the film’s chief weakness, particularly when the journey begins to feel repetitive.

Adventure films often reward persistence, and this expedition has plenty of that. Werner Herzog makes such persistence look increasingly deranged when it serves the conquest of a place its visitors scarcely understand. The conquistadors’ claim to importance becomes difficult to take seriously, even while their capacity to frighten remains. There is grim humour in their self-importance, and Klaus Kinski’s excess belongs in that humour.

The disturbing thing is how much attention Aguirre can still demand once we have recognised his delusions. Werner Herzog understands the attraction of watching such a figure, and allows us to become uncomfortable with our own fascination without labouring the point. See it when you can give the river as much attention as the leading man.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

89
Positive
13
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are unanimously positive, with praise clustering around Klaus Kinski’s feverish performance and Werner Herzog’s use of the Amazon landscape. Critics repeatedly describe the expedition’s madness through the physical force of the locations: the river and jungle make the conquistadors’ ambitions look puny. Kinski’s portrayal of deluded authority is the other constant, giving the film’s treatment of greed and colonial power a disturbing human focus. The Playlist also singles out Popol Vuh’s haunting score.

The spread runs from approval to outright celebration, rather than revealing a substantive critical divide. The Independent and RogerEbert.com offer the more restrained assessments, but both still praise Kinski, with the latter also stressing the river journey’s physical reality. No clear reservation recurs across the supplied reviews; differences lie chiefly in how much attention critics give to imperial folly, oppressive atmosphere or the rawness of filming on location.

Little White Lies
7 June 2013 · 5/5/4 · David Jenkins
100

This 1972 masterpiece returns to the big screen as a cause for major celebration and one of the true greats, an adventure saga about the ultimate futility of existence. Kinski’s performance is teleported from the silent era in its intensity.

Read the full review →
Time Out
4 June 2013 · ★★★★★ · Cath Clarke
100

Werner Herzog’s mad masterpiece from 1972 still has its hallucinatory charge and is an awesome feat of filmmaking. Watch it for Kinski’s performance and a succession of haunting images.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2012 · Ian Nathan
90*

Herzog's film is a masterful study of madness, greed, and man's futile conflict with the Amazon jungle, sparked by the nightmarish production involving Klaus Kinski. The director captures nature as a vast, destructive force that reduces the conquistadors to insignificance.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
7 June 2013
90*

This re-release of Herzog's 1972 classic depicts a 1560s Spanish expedition to El Dorado that descends into madness. The film powerfully merges landscapes and characters in a way that makes it unforgettable.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
25 March 2016
90*

Herzog’s hypnotic film is a fevered descent into madness and myth, blending hallucinatory Romanticism with Brechtian realism as a haunting allegory of imperialist ruin. It remains unrivalled in its evocation of colonial avarice and folly.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 June 2013 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic praises the restored 1972 film as one of the great folies de grandeur of 1970s cinema, a Conradian nightmare of colonial madness. Kinski's performance as the paranoid, visionary conquistador is singled out as that of a natural-born tyrant whose delusions drive the expedition.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

César Award for Best Foreign Film, 1976

Nominated
César Award for Best Foreign Film

If you liked this, try…

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre poster88

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre

1948 · Gold fever makes bad companions of men already short on trust.

Embrace of the Serpent poster

Embrace of the Serpent

2015 · Another river journey that lets the jungle challenge the visitors’ account of themselves.

The Wages of Fear poster

The Wages of Fear

1953 · Dangerous terrain exposes human pretensions, with tension measured in painfully small movements.

Meek's Cutoff poster

Meek's Cutoff

2010 · Exhaustion and uncertain leadership turn the promise of new territory sour.

Fitzcarraldo poster82

Fitzcarraldo

1982 · Another grand ambition meets the practical inconvenience of an Amazonian river.