The reviews are uniformly positive, with praise centred on the quantity, variety and precision of the jokes. Critics repeatedly point to the combination of wordplay, sight gags and layered background business, which rewards repeat viewing without letting the disaster-film spoof lose momentum. The straight-faced performances are another point of agreement: serious actors treat the absurdity earnestly, while Radio Times singles out Leslie Nielsen and the supporting veterans for making effective comic use of their established personas.
The differences concern degrees of enthusiasm rather than any substantial opposition, with assessments ranging from warmly approving to ecstatic. RogerEbert.com finds the humour sophomoric and corny but argues that these qualities help it get laughs where more ambitious comedies struggle. Reservations elsewhere mostly concern its influence: Slant Magazine questions the habit of mocking older films that it helps popularise, while The AV Club notes the lesser imitators that follow without finding the original diminished.
