Critics’ reviews

Alien Resurrection (1997)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 55: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Alien Resurrection

55
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
4

The reviews split almost down the middle, but they agree on one thing: Sigourney Weaver. Her cloned Ripley, jaded, sardonic and not entirely human, is called the best thing in the film by admirers and detractors alike, and several critics find her more compelling than the aliens. Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s look for the film, grungy and fantastical, is widely noted, and the underwater sequence is singled out again and again as the set piece that works.

Beyond that the spread is wide. The 1997 notices are largely cold: they find it nasty and emotionally remote, and Roger Ebert dismisses it as forgettable and Winona Ryder as miscast. The defences come later, from critics who treat it as a comic-book actioneer or a grotesque art film due a reappraisal; Paste argues its oddness now looks prescient. Consequence stands furthest out, calling it the worst of the original series and blaming a mismatch between Joss Whedon’s script and Jeunet’s direction.

Slant Magazine
15 December 2003 · Ed Gonzalez
75*

The critic recommends treating the much-maligned film as a comic-book actioneer full of laughs rather than a serious entry in the series. They single out Sigourney Weaver's jaded, quotable performance and the film's goofy, entertaining set pieces for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
25 August 2006 · Ian Nathan
70*

The critic finds Alien Resurrection a lively, humorous and atmospheric entry that improves on Alien3, though it sometimes prioritises gags and gore over sustained tension. Jeunet’s visual style, particularly the electrifying cinematography and underwater sequence, is singled out for praise alongside Sigourney Weaver’s performance.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
70*

The review finds the film distinctive thanks to Jeunet's fantastical style and Joss Whedon's genetic nightmare premise, but notes the director disengages from the action set-pieces. It singles out Sigourney Weaver's intense, ambivalent cloned Ripley as the standout element, more compelling than the aliens themselves.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 November 1997 · Janet Maslin
55*

Maslin describes the film as the series' most freakish and macabre entry with an eerie grunge look and ghastly sideshow atmosphere, praising Weaver's buff and sardonic Ripley while noting its extreme nastiness may overwhelm some viewers.

Read the full review →
Variety
5 December 1997 · Derek Elley
50*

Elley finds the film generally cold but sometimes wildly imaginative and jokey, with gripping action set pieces including an underwater sequence, but held back by lack of emotional engagement and half-assimilated quirks.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
26 November 1997 · Roger Ebert
35*

Ebert calls the film a forgettable 'geek show' with little artistic impact and no sense of wonder in its production design, while praising Sigourney Weaver's strong performance as Ripley and noting Winona Ryder is miscast.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 November 1997 · Kenneth Turan
30*

Turan deems it strictly for hardcore horror fans obsessed with slime, gore and repulsion, criticizing its pretentious dead-end weirdness and stylized grotesquerie while noting Weaver is the best thing in it.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
19 February 2015 · Joshua Winning
75*

The critic defends the film as a unique, grotesque and mesmerising 'art film' with fresh ideas, morbid humour and a compelling mutated Ripley clone, despite tonal shifts from prior entries and Whedon's disavowal. They single out the underwater sequence, the newborn hybrid creature, and Weaver's performance for praise while noting it is the least scary entry.

Read the full review →
Paste
25 November 2022 · Matthew Jackson
75*

The critic argues that Alien Resurrection deserves reappraisal as a bold, energetic franchise revamp whose quirky design, cast and tone feel prescient today. He singles out Jeunet’s distinctive visual and directorial choices for particular praise.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
22 October 2010 · Andy Petrou
40*

The critic finds the concept intriguing but the execution disappointing due to a weak script and lack of suspense, calling it a guilty pleasure at best that leaves much to be desired. He singles out the underwater sequences for praise.

Read the full review →
Consequence
21 November 2022
30*

The piece calls the film the worst in the original Alien series, a complete trainwreck caused by the mismatch between Whedon’s script and Jeunet’s direction. It highlights the resulting incoherence and lack of thematic unity as the main flaws.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate