Critics’ reviews

Aliens (1986)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 86: 11 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Aliens

86
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is strongly positive: most critics welcome James Cameron’s shift from confined horror towards military action, finding that the sequel expands the original without losing its capacity to frighten. Praise centres on Cameron’s control of tension, the physical force of the action and the practical effects. Sigourney Weaver is the clearest point of agreement, with reviews crediting her performance as Ripley with giving the spectacle emotional weight; several also value the character’s resourcefulness and maternal role.

The differences concern how much that expansion costs in atmosphere, originality and character. Enthusiasm ranges from wholehearted approval to qualified admiration: The New York Times finds the script thin and overwhelmed by technique, while Slant Magazine admires the action and use of space but objects to archetypal characters and the treatment of gender. Elsewhere, reservations focus on diminished surprise and a preference for the original’s more restrained horror.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

This sequel surpasses the original in sheer spectacle as Ripley joins marines to confront colonised aliens in a hi-tech house of horrors. Cameron masterfully controls tension and pace for shocks, suspense and an Oscar-winning fright-fest.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
18 July 1986 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The film is a superb example of filmmaking craft and intense thriller that delivers on its promise to frighten, though it leaves the viewer drained and anxious rather than entertained. It singles out Sigourney Weaver's strong, sympathetic performance as the thread holding everything together along with the professional special effects.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
95*

The critic calls Aliens the perfect sequel that expands on the original while standing alone, crediting Cameron's vision and nerve in turning it into a war movie with an army of aliens. They single out the intense, physical execution of the action and Ripley's resourcefulness as a strong female lead.

Read the full review →
Total Film
27 October 2014 · Kevin Harley
90*

The critic praises Cameron's sequel for preserving what worked in the original and multiplying it into a war movie, while still delivering horror through sudden encounters and strong scripting. They highlight the maternal themes with Ripley and the ageless practical effects as making it state-of-the-art action-horror.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 July 1986 · Sheila Benson
80*

It is a perfectly honorable sequel that is taut, inexorably paced and successful when Weaver is onscreen, though more blaster action than Gothic future-horror. It singles out Sigourney Weaver as the white-hot core with fine, irascible dialogue and athleticism.

Read the full review →
Time Out
9 July 2014 · TCh
80*

The sequel builds slowly to develop Ripley's multi-dimensional character while escalating the action with hi-tech hardware and hordes of aliens. Cameron's work maintains a tension between masculine and feminine qualities, culminating in an epic battle.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 July 1986 · Walter Goodman
75*

It is a flaming, flashing, crashing blow-'em-up show that keeps you popping from your seat with its effects and perils, though less innovative than the predecessor and with a skimpy script overwhelmed by technique. It singles out the special-effects specialists and Sigourney Weaver's rescue and return to action.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1985 · Variety Staff
75*

It proves a very worthy followup that makes up for lack of surprise with sheer volume of thrills and chills. It singles out Sigourney Weaver's smashing job as Ripley and the overall expert craftsmanship, though it notes Ridley Scott had more of an artist's touch.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
15 December 2003 · Ed Gonzalez

The review calls Aliens a cruder, greedy mega-production where human melodramas take a back seat to kick-ass action sequences, praising Cameron's direction of action and use of space while criticizing archetypal characters and subtextual gender dynamics.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 July 2017 · Dennis Fischer

The critic finds Aliens a wild roller-coaster ride that should attract thrill fans, praising its action and suspense after a slow buildup while noting it reprises concepts from the original but shifts to high-energy set pieces.

Read the full review →
Paste
1 October 2021 · Jim Vorel
90*

Aliens is a perfect example of a bigger and better sequel, reframing the original story within a new action-horror genre twist while preserving corporate bureaucracy themes. It excels through its rowdy space marines, the addition of the alien queen, and Cameron's talent for scaling up stakes effectively.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
5 February 2002 · Gator MacReady
85*

The critic praises James Cameron's sequel for expertly balancing action, suspense, and sub-text while delivering relentless tension, shocks, and a strong emotional core through Ripley's surrogate mother relationship with Newt. It highlights the intense marine sequences, the haunting score, and the epic final showdown with the Alien Queen as making it a superior popcorn thriller and one of the greatest action rides.

Read the full review →
Collider
19 August 2024 · 8/10 · Maggie Boccella
80

Aliens is a superior film to Alien, offering a thrilling, action-packed take on the xenomorphs and their queen. The diverse cast of characters adds depth and charm, making the crew's fate more impactful and intense.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate