Critics’ reviews

Amarcord (1973)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 81: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Amarcord

81
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Amarcord’s affectionate, comic recollection of small-town life, praising Fellini’s ability to turn memory into fantasy without losing its sadness. The praise centres on the town’s inhabitants, the dreamlike imagery and the movement between humour and darker scenes under fascism. Several reviews find the episodic storytelling expressive rather than disjointed. The Los Angeles Times singles out Nino Rota’s music and Giuseppe Rotunno’s cinematography for their evocative power.

The divide concerns how far that affection excuses the indulgence, with seven positive reviews and one sharply negative response. Time Out prefers the public ensemble scenes to individual episodes that lean on corny jokes. The Guardian is the clear dissenter, treating the recollections of local women, youthful pranks and provincial fascists as tiresome old stories. Most other critics find enough invention, tenderness and coherence in those anecdotes to sustain the film.

RogerEbert.com
19 December 2020 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

Ebert calls Amarcord a movie made entirely out of nostalgia and joy by a filmmaker at the height of his powers. He praises how Fellini gathers legends of his youth, transforming memories with affection and fantasy into larger-than-life characters.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
90*

The critic praises this Oscar-winning bittersweet nostalgia piece as Fellini's most slyly elegiac work, highlighting its timeless universality and memorable set-pieces like the Fascist rally and luxury liner arrival despite its episodic structure.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 February 2011 · Glenn Heath Jr.
90*

The critic praises how Amarcord captures the fluidity of memory and nostalgia through its episodic structure, visual poetry, and tonal shifts between light and dark. Fellini’s fragmented portrayal of a town and its inhabitants during the rise of fascism is seen as a poignant reflection on the fallacies of recollection.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 September 1974 · Vincent Canby
90*

Canby calls Amarcord possibly Fellini's most marvelous film, an extravagantly funny and dreamlike evocation of a year in a small Italian coastal town in the 1930s. He praises its imaginative recreation of small-town life as recalled by the director.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
23 September 1974 · Penelope Gilliatt
85*

Gilliatt finds Amarcord even more beautiful and detailed than 8½, the most dreamlike film Fellini has made, about childhood recalled by a fifty-year-old man. She praises its economical, anecdotal yet cohesive quality as a comic but stirringly saddening work of affection and wonder.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 February 2009 · Kevin Thomas
80*

Thomas describes Amarcord as a ravishing memory film in which reminiscence, rumor, legend, local history and male sexual fantasies flow with ease and grace. He singles out the evocative powers of composer Nino Rota and cinematographer Giuseppe Rotunno in this restoration.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 November 2011 · JR
70*

Fellini recreates a fantasy vision of his hometown under fascism with soap opera and burlesque elements, achieving stronger effects through ensemble scenes in public spaces. Individual character moments often fall back on corny jokes, yet the film retains Fellini's distinctive flavour overall.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 September 2004 · Steve Rose
40*

This is regarded as Fellini's last great work, which is a polite way of saying it was the last time anyone indulged him with the resources to create something 'Fellini-esque'. It's a bit like listening to a granddad's old stories - which mostly revolve around voluptuous local women, youthful pranks, voluble relatives and provincial fascists.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate