Most critics like this film, and almost all of them for the same two reasons. Jill Clayburgh’s performance draws the warmest words: assured, sensitive, courageous, and in Film Comment’s view one of the great recent screen characters. Mazursky’s direction is credited with a sharp eye for New York detail and for letting his people roam, so that the politics of divorce and independence arrive through behaviour rather than speeches.
The reservations are about toughness. Writing on release, The New Yorker finds the film funny and buoyant but virtuous rather than properly critical, with too many liberation themes and some hot air. The New York Times, the one mixed notice, admires the performance and the sharpest scenes but thinks the whole is softer than they promise. The spread is narrow otherwise, and the later reviews are the warmer ones, with Collider in particular defending the open ending as confidence rather than evasion.
