Critics’ reviews

Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy (2004)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 67: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy

67
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics find Anchorman an uneven but rewarding comedy, with praise centred on Will Ferrell’s commitment to Ron Burgundy’s vanity and obliviousness. The reviews favour its absurd dialogue, rapid-fire gags and willingness to pursue a joke beyond ordinary sense. Several also credit the supporting cast, particularly Carell and Applegate, with keeping the silliness lively. For its admirers, the loose sketch-comedy structure gives the performers room to be funny, even when the story offers little support.

Reservations cluster around that same looseness: the plotting wanders, the humour misses as often as it lands for some, and the satire of 1970s attitudes feels underdeveloped. The Guardian sees an unfinished script and missed opportunities in the gender-politics premise. The spread is broad rather than unanimous, with Eye for Film the sharpest dissenter, finding Ferrell largely unwatchable and the crude, sexist gags unrewarding. Even the warmer reviews acknowledge weak stretches or self-indulgence.

The AV Club
7 July 2004 · Keith Phipps
80*

The film delivers plentiful laughs through its committed, absurd humor and sketch-comedy style. The critic singles out Ferrell's Method-like dedication to the oblivious anchorman role and the rapid-fire gags for praise.

Read the full review →
Total Film
10 September 2004
80*

Ferrell delivers his best work yet as the quotable Ron Burgundy in a lean, anarchic comedy that fits his talents perfectly, despite a couple of weak links and a syrupy climax.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 May 2004 · Nick Schager
75*

Anchorman is a ridiculously moronic but frequently riotous comedy that excels at illogical dialogue and inane non-sequiturs. The critic praises its madman energy and satirical take on 1970s news while noting some satire grows stale.

Read the full review →
Empire
· William Thomas
70*

The film is a hit-and-miss extended sketch with inspired idiocy alongside baffling lunacy, but Ferrell carries it with a gifted supporting cast including Applegate and Carell.

Read the full review →
The Times
11 September 2004 · John McNamara
70*

Ferrell's comic skill overcomes the Alan Partridge comparisons in this fine comedy about a pompous 1970s anchorman thrown by the arrival of a female co-anchor. The overblown performance and news-team battle set-piece are highlighted as sources of fun despite unoriginal material.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · Anna Smith
70*

The critic finds the film a flimsy sitcom propelled by absurd humour and silly gags that eventually win you over. Cameos and comic talent help it stick despite self-indulgence.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Adam Smith
60

The review calls it a sporadically amusing but thoroughly dumb comedy that feels like an extended sketch. A few puerile jokes pay off thanks to cameos, but it overstays its welcome.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 September 2004
60*

The critic finds Will Ferrell's performance as the vain anchorman charming enough to carry the 1970s comedy, but notes that the story wanders after setting up its gender-politics premise. Silly gags and character names are praised but the script feels unfinished, leading to a verdict of missed opportunities amid frat-pack fun.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
8 July 2004 · Robert Lloyd

The review sees the film as capturing how local TV news sells illusion and community over substance, praising its understanding of the medium's vapid appeal and the shift to a 'family' news team format. It singles out the parody of news team rivalries and the arrival of the female co-anchor for comment.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 July 2004 · A. O. Scott

The critic finds the film amusing but not as uninhibited as other Ferrell vehicles, praising its cheerful dumbness and Ferrell's inventive lunacy while noting a weak satire on 1970s attitudes. It singles out the jazz flute interlude and rival news teams rumble for praise amid the silliness.

Read the full review →
Variety
29 June 2004 · Brian Lowry

The critic calls it breezy summer fun with inspired lunacy from Ferrell and McKay, praising the spoof of 1970s local news and the topnotch cast especially Carell and Koechner. It singles out the outlandish flights of fancy like the animated dream sequence and news team melee.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
10 September 2004 · Angus Wolfe Murray
25*

The critic dismisses the film as lowbrow toilet farce in the tradition of the Farrelly brothers, finding Will Ferrell largely unwatchable amid crude, sexist gags and broad slapstick. Applegate is noted as holding her own but ultimately unable to elevate the material.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate