The reviews are mostly warm, with a wide spread beneath the warmth. Most critics agree on the surface: the desert town is meticulously built, the production design and the 1950s Americana are praised almost everywhere, and the large ensemble is found to be game. The praise clusters around the play-within-a-television-broadcast framing, which the film’s admirers take as Anderson’s most searching work on grief, family and making sense of the world through art, and around Jason Schwartzman and Scarlett Johansson, whom several critics, including the Los Angeles Times and The Hollywood Reporter, single out for bringing feeling to a cool design. The reservations cluster on the same framing device: doubters find it over-complicated and dramatically inert, holding the audience at arm’s length. The dissent is sharp rather than mild. The Guardian finds it smug and suffocating, and Variety judges it for die-hards only. Nearly everyone agrees it will not convert the unconvinced.
L
Little White Lies
20 June 2023 · 5/5/5 · David Jenkins
100
The critic calls it a witty and deeply moving exploration, the maestro's formula tweaked to perfection, praising its metafictional dismantling of artistic creation and emotional depth.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
16 June 2023 · Bilge Ebiri
90*
The review calls Asteroid City a masterpiece that brings necessary madness to Anderson's method, connecting human mysteries to the unknown. It singles out the emotional wallop of the meta-theatrical climax for praise.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
22 June 2023 · ★★★★ · Robbie Collin
80
Anderson’s oddest and most conceptually complex film yet is a play-within-a-film confection that rewards long-term fans with intricate whirrings and emotional depth. It explores finding and playing a role in life amid grief, love and existential search, with inimitable surface pleasures.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
16 June 2023 · Anthony Lane
75*
Emotions are stylized like the clothes in this ordered film, but Scarlett Johansson’s performance cracks the surface open. The title is a joke and the story layers a play within a TV broadcast, with delight in the textural contrasts and stylized elements.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
15 June 2023 · Justin Chang
65*
The gorgeous production design and starry ensemble make for a half-irritating, half-intoxicating experience that soars, stalls and sometimes alienates. It lands on a moving conclusion that we are not alone, with Schwartzman and Johansson leaving the most poignant impression.
Read the full review →V
Variety
23 May 2023 · Owen Gleiberman
40*
The director’s creation of a tiny desert town is an ingenious act of world-building, but what happens there has the turgid ironic whimsy of earlier Anderson films. It looks smashing but is dramatically inert and for die-hards only.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
25 June 2023 · Mark Kermode
30*
The critic finds the film a smug and irritating exercise in studied quirkiness despite its meticulous visuals and starry cast. The meta structure and deadpan tone fail to engage, leaving a vacuum-sealed atmosphere that becomes suffocating.
Read the full review →E
Empire
23 May 2023 · John Nugent
The critic finds Asteroid City a delightful return to form for Anderson, praising its meticulous visual style, production design, and handling of themes like family, grief, and love amid meta framing and eccentric characters. It notes the film may not convert skeptics and can feel indulgent or unfocused at times.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
25 May 2023 · ★★★☆☆
Wes Anderson’s latest is a minutely arranged homage to 1950s space nerds and star-crossed lovers that delights devout fans with its retro stylings and meta details but is unlikely to convert others. It improves on The French Dispatch with an emotional centre and gentle satire.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
23 May 2023 · festival review
The critic finds it delightful, occasionally moving and exquisitely crafted, a modest charmer about making sense of the world through art, with impeccable design and a winning whimsical tone.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
25 May 2023
The critic praises the film's ambitious world-building and scene-by-scene pleasures in its comic-sketch style, highlighting the ensemble cast and 1950s Americana markers, while noting the meta framing device.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
23 May 2023 · festival review · David Rooney
The review finds the film unequal parts exuberant and exasperating, with over-complicated framing and a lack of emotional pull despite impeccable craft. It singles out Jason Schwartzman and Scarlett Johansson for bringing poignant yearning to their roles amid the distancing whimsy.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
15 June 2023 · Critic's Pick · Manohla Dargis
The film is filled with the expected visuals and curiosities from Anderson, comic and wry but with the soul of a tragedy. It explores desire, death, small mysteries, cosmic unknowns and the stories made of life through a meta structure of a TV show about a play.
Read the full review →T
The Times
23 June 2023 · ★★★★☆ · Ed Potton
The director delivers another whimsical wonder with real emotion beneath the layers of artifice in this fantastical tale of a junior stargazers’ convention. An all-star cast brings warmth and Lynchian weirdness to the tricksy framing of play and TV show.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
23 May 2023 · Recommended · Phil de Semlyen
The critic describes it as a heart-stirring, surrealist treat and Anderson's most bittersweet film about family since The Royal Tenenbaums, praising its whimsical sci-fi take on fellowship and the ensemble performances.
Read the full review →The review calls it a playfully searching delight that contemplates infinity and life's mysteries while holding firm to Anderson's signature style. It highlights the wry exploration of grief, anxiety, and nuclear fears alongside inventive meta elements and strong performances from the ensemble.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
25 May 2023 · festival review · Isaac Feldberg
85*
The critic finds it a strong, deeply layered movie and Wes Anderson at his most mature and magical, singling out the framing device and existential themes.
Read the full review →The piece positions the film as a meta exploration of how stories and art help people find meaning in life, blending Western, sci-fi, and arthouse elements. It singles out Anderson's use of symmetry, pastel colors, and drama-free performances for praise.
Read the full review →N
NME
23 June 2023 · ★★★★ · James Mottram
80
The critic praises the film's lush visuals, large ensemble cast, and affectionate take on 1950s sci-fi tropes within Wes Anderson's signature style. Jason Schwartzman's performance and the meta framing device are highlighted as particular strengths.
Read the full review →/
/Film
24 May 2023 · 7.5/10 · Lex Briscuso
75
Asteroid City is a top-tier Wes Anderson original with a magical sci-fi edge that brings back carefree fun and charm while taking small risks. It is a blissful experiment, though not as profound in messaging as some earlier works.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
23 June 2023 · ★★★ · Emily Breen
60
The film is a beautiful but frustrating Wes Anderson outing, with a game cast, keen ideas and gorgeous aesthetic that make for a playful if shallow slice. Annoying title cards and shallow characterisations prevent full immersion in its charm or deeper questions about grief and connection.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
15 June 2023 · Adam Nayman
60*
It is a return to form but feels like the work of a perfectionist on autopilot; praises technical mastery and ensemble while questioning whether it moves the audience.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
23 May 2023 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
The film is a madly quirky surprise that oozes creativity at every turn, with distinctive stylized storytelling and propulsive lateral tracking shots that give it urgency and snap. The show-within-a-film conceit complicates things without much payoff and may baffle general audiences.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate