Critics’ reviews

Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 57: 3 positive, 6 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Austin Powers in Goldmember

57
Positive
3
Mixed
6
Negative
2

The reviews lean towards a mixed verdict: Austin Powers in Goldmember still produces laughs, but enthusiasm for its familiar routines varies considerably. Praise clusters around individual comic sequences, Mike Myers’s performances and the supporting cast, with Michael Caine drawing particular approval. The opening sequence, cameos and sight gags earn strong notices from its admirers, while even less enthusiastic reviews find comic interludes worth enjoying. Most critics acknowledge some entertainment value without agreeing that the whole film works.

The divide centres on freshness and comic discipline. Total Film praises a fresh story and tightly executed comedy; other reviews describe recycled formulas, frantic pacing and a plot that cannot sustain the weaker jokes. Vulgar humour is another sticking point, tolerated by some and wearisome to others. The spread is wide: the Evening Standard finds the film exhausting and derivative, with Mini-Me its sole source of enjoyment.

The Guardian
26 July 2002 · ★★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
80

Bradshaw gives the comedy a strongly positive verdict, despite a few slow stretches. He especially praises its energy, visual invention and arch comic intelligence, as well as Michael Caine’s performance.

Read the full review →
Total Film
26 July 2002 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The critic calls it the best film in the series, praising its fresh story and confident comedy. They single out the tightly executed cameos, sight gags and opening sequence for generating laughs.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
25 November 2002 · ★★★½ · Ed Gonzalez
70

Gonzalez finds the film messy but the funniest entry in the series, with Mike Myers’s comedy mostly succeeding. He singles out the DVD’s explosive, clean sound as exceptional.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
25 July 2002 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The review text is inaccessible, so its verdict cannot be determined. No particular praise or complaint is visible in the available page text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Jason Caro
60

Caro finds the third outing enjoyable but overly reliant on familiar comic formulas. He praises memorable contributions from the series’ colourful supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
59*

The page identifies this as Time Out’s review and recalls the first film as a scream and the second as a colossal dud. The visible description ends before giving a complete verdict on Goldmember or singling out a specific strength or flaw.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Charles Gant
55*

Gant finds the film funny in places but overly frantic and less focused than it needs to be. He praises Myers’s comic interludes and the running gag involving Mini-Me, while noting that weaker jokes lack an engaging story to support them.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 July 2002 · A.O. Scott
50*

The review gives a mixed verdict on the film. It singles out its humor while suggesting the comedy has lost some freshness.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 July 2002 · Todd McCarthy
40*

The critic finds the film an erratic collection of familiar jokes, with its humor weighed down by excessive toilet gags and a dated Swinging ’60s sensibility. He praises several comic set pieces, especially the prison musical number.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
15*

The critic finds the film an exhausting, derivative failure. They single out Mini Me as the one source of enjoyment, praising how little the character says.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
28 July 2002 · Angus Wolfe Murray
60*

The critic finds the third instalment entertaining, despite its implausible plot and vulgar humour. Michael Caine’s presence and Beyoncé Knowles’s performance are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate