Most critics come down in favour, and the praise clusters almost entirely on the ocean. The underwater sequences, the sea creatures and the motion capture are singled out again and again, with several reviews saying the film puts you somewhere you have not been before. A good number also find the family story warmer than the first film’s, and one review calls it Cameron’s most personal work. Even the doubters concede the effects are a technical achievement.
The reservations gather around the script: a thin plot stretched over three hours, characters left underdeveloped, Neytiri in particular, and subplots that pad rather than build. The spread is wide, from admiration to outright dismissal, and the dissent is notably British. The Guardian finds the film inert and its high-frame-rate effects soulless, The Times calls it a slavish remake of the original, and Sight and Sound finds it numbing. Den of Geek also flags the high frame rate as working against the visuals.
E
Empire
13 December 2022 · Nick de Semlyen
90*
Cameron delivers a dazzling, immersive marine epic that expands Pandora's world with breathtaking visuals, heartfelt family elements, and thrilling action sequences, reminding viewers of his mastery of big-screen spectacle.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
13 December 2022 · Justin Chang
90*
An exercise in Na’vi gazing that immerses viewers in a brilliantly realized ocean-floor nirvana through sophisticated visual effects and buoyant camera movement. Cameron makes stuff glow up real good in this transporting sequel.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
13 December 2022 · David Rooney
90*
The critic finds the mega-sequel a hugely entertaining follow-up that delivers on action, emotion, and thrilling 3-D visuals, with persuasive CGI and immersive underwater world-building that pulls viewers in despite basic narrative and dialogue. The expanded bio-diverse environment and visceral warfare keep it mesmerizing.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
13 December 2022 · Bilge Ebiri
90*
The critic calls it Cameron’s most personal film, spectacular in its underwater sequences and effects while centering family dynamics, identity, and belonging on Pandora. The dreamy whale-filled passages and cathartic final battles blend sincerity with the director’s signature corny-yet-ruthless emotional style.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
13 December 2022 · ★★★☆☆ · Danny Leigh
70*
The critic views the sequel as drowning in epic sincerity rather than feeling like a lazy cash grab, with exhausting worldbuilding but a grandly spectacular finale. He singles out the hint of Titanic in the closing sequences as a personal touch.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
13 December 2022
70*
An extraordinary visual spectacle with superior motion-capture and effects, but the narrative lacks focus and emotional nuance compared to the original, making it more compelling as a visceral experience.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
14 December 2022 · A.O. Scott
70*
Cameron returns to Pandora with ecological themes and visual bedazzlements in this grand, muddled project. The embrace of adolescent idealism and moral outrage forms the emotional heart of the movie.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
13 December 2022 · Matt Maytum
70*
The film is an imperfect but imposing blockbuster that dazzles with supersized spectacle, sincere emotion, and ambitious world-building, though it falls short of Cameron's best in focused storytelling.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
13 December 2022 · ★★★ · Josh Winning
60
The film offers an enchanting visual world and feast for the eyes but is let down by a long, meandering story and underdeveloped characters, especially Neytiri.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
16 December 2022 · Anthony Lane
50*
The sequel is split by Cameron’s contradictory instincts between vegan nature-plumbing and hard-core weaponry. It features impressive underwater sequences and action choreography but feels long with some dawdling.
Read the full review →i
The i Paper
13 December 2022 · Christina Newland
40*
The critic finds the sequel visually impressive with stunning underwater scenes but ultimately forgettable and goofy, lacking emotional depth or lasting impact despite its spectacle and progressive themes.
Read the full review →T
The Times
13 December 2022 · ★★☆☆☆ · Kevin Maher
30*
The critic calls the film visually spectacular yet superfluous and a slavish remake of the original that feels like a three-hour borefest. He singles out the needless subplots and side stories that bloat the runtime without adding value.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
13 December 2022 · Peter Bradshaw
20*
The critic finds the film a disappointing, overlong and insipid follow-up that stretches a thin story into an expensive but inert epic. He singles out the soulless high-frame-rate underwater effects and lack of visual interest or genuine excitement.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
16 November 2022
10*
The critic finds the sequel dismal, numbing, overlong and deadeningly obvious, lacking the groundbreaking immersiveness and sense of wonder of the first film.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
13 December 2022 · Todd McCarthy
90*
The critic says the sequel more than fulfills the promise of the original, describing it as beautiful, obsessive and eventful in its depiction of a threatened Eden. He singles out the supreme care and technical achievement in creating hyper-realistic, never-before-seen environments and spectacular sea life for praise.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
16 December 2022 · Miles Surrey
85*
The critic finds the sequel a sophisticated evolution that adds emotional depth through family dynamics and character arcs alongside its technical wizardry. They single out the move to the ocean setting and the introduction of the intelligent, whale-like tulkun as highlights that enhance the environmental message.
Read the full review →C
Collider
13 December 2022 · B+ · Ross Bonaime
83
The critic calls it one of the most breathtaking moviegoing experiences of 2022 and a masterclass in learning from the first film's weaknesses. They single out the improved script, family-focused character dynamics, and extraordinary visuals—especially the underwater sequences and third-act action.
Read the full review →N
NME
13 December 2022 · Ali Shutler
80*
The review calls the sequel bolder and better than the original, praising its expanded world-building, lived-in characters, family themes, breathtaking ocean sequences, and thrilling finale while noting it must be seen on the biggest screen possible.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
15 December 2022 · ★★½ · Don Kaye
50
The critic finds the film visually stunning with groundbreaking effects and immersive world-building but criticizes its thin plot, lack of character development, repetitive story beats, and intrusive high frame rate that undermines the visuals.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate