Critics’ reviews

Bad Lieutenant (1992)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 71: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Bad Lieutenant

71
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics respond favourably to Abel Ferrara’s grim study of a corrupt, drug-addicted policeman, with praise concentrated on Harvey Keitel’s exposed, anguished performance. The reviews repeatedly describe his sincerity as the force that keeps the character’s degradation compelling. Ferrara’s feel for urban decay also earns approval, particularly the vivid locations and oppressive atmosphere. For most critics, the explicit sex, violence and drug use serve a serious examination of faith and possible redemption.

The division concerns how much weight those religious themes can bear. The Independent finds the claims to redemption hollow and pretentious, while still admiring Ferrara’s handling of mood and Keitel’s performance. Empire is strongly supportive but calls the study overbearing, showing that discomfort with its excesses extends beyond the negative verdict. The spread is broad, then, but the central performance remains common ground even where belief in the film’s larger purpose gives way.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Ferrara delivers another exceptionally strong film with this controversial story of a corrupt cop who gets a chance at redemption while investigating a nun's rape. The explicit and violent depiction aims to shock viewers out of complacency, anchored by Keitel's bravest performance.

Read the full review →
Variety
6 May 1992 · festival review
80*

Abel Ferrara's film is a harrowing journey with a corrupt NY cop sinking into the lower depths amid frank depictions of drug addiction, sexuality, and lost faith. It singles out Harvey Keitel's extraordinary, uninhibited performance as the standout element at its Cannes premiere.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 January 2012 · TCh
75*

The film is a raw slice of low life centered on a corrupt, drug-addled cop whose depravity peaks during the investigation of a nun's rape. Ferrara elicits an extraordinarily honest, bare performance from Keitel and finds a jarring note of redemption amid the sleaze.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
30 December 1992 · Peter Rainer
70*

The archetypal tale centers on a nameless lieutenant spiraling through addiction and vice while probing a nun's rape, ultimately seeking salvation. Rainer highlights Ferrara's muscular sense of rot and Keitel's powerful performance that holds attention through the descent into hell.

Read the full review →
The Independent
19 February 1993 · Sheila Johnston
40*

The film is a character study with grand pretensions to faith and redemption that ring hollow, coming across as pretentious despite Ferrara's skill at building mood. Keitel delivers an anguished, naked performance that is the film's one unquestionable strength.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2002 · Ian Nathan

Ferrara out-sleazes his own oeuvre with a powerful if overbearing study of a soul swallowed by depravity, featuring every form of narcotic use and Keitel's raw, naked scenes. It is quite possibly Ferrara's finest hour thanks to Keitel's unbearably sincere central performance.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 November 1992 · Critic's Pick · Janet Maslin

The film follows a corrupt, drug-addled New York cop whose depravity is on full display as he investigates the rape of a nun. Maslin notes its raw talent and polarizing sensationalism while praising its vivid locations and unflinching look at the city's seamy side.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 March 2010 · Themroc
80*

Ferrara’s bleak, uncompromising film has gained a cult following with improved critical reputation; the sensitivity of direction and Keitel’s passionate, sincere performance make a case for redemption despite the depravity.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
16 April 2012 · ★★★★ · Barry Steele
80

The film is a dark, grimy character piece elevated by Keitel's immense, mesmerizing performance; it explores themes of religion and redemption but is not for the faint of heart.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate