Critics’ reviews

Batman Forever (1995)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 52: 4 positive, 2 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Batman Forever

52
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
4

The critics split almost evenly, and the divide runs partly along the calendar: the 1995 notices are cool, the later reappraisals warmer. The praise clusters around pace and look. Several find it faster and funnier than Burton’s films, and the neon comic-book production design is admired even by critics who dislike the result. Jim Carrey’s Riddler is the performance most often singled out, with Val Kilmer’s Bruce Wayne judged charming or at least acceptable.

The reservations concern what all that colour is for. Many find the film loud and overloaded, with a perfunctory plot, overacting villains and a Batman who is never properly defined. The spread is wide. Den of Geek calls it the point where the rot set in for the series and objects to the addition of Robin, while Collider and Polygon argue it is underrated, Polygon adding that it is closer to the comics than Burton’s films.

Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

The critic finds it the funniest and fastest in the series thanks to its brisk pace and stylish effects, making for enjoyable popcorn entertainment despite shifting from the darker tone of previous films.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 May 2019 · ★★★★☆ · Peter Bradshaw
70*

The critic calls it an enjoyably camp iteration with a buff Val Kilmer as Batman. The film is noted for being a little wackier than its predecessors, perhaps closer to the 1960s TV version.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2014 · Ian Nathan
55*

The review sees Schumacher's take as flawed yet brilliant and messy but impressive, a camp Bat-flick that hasn't aged well. It praises the villainous double-act especially Carrey's energetic Riddler and the comic-book visuals, but criticizes the lack of restraint, plot logic, and cohesive characterisation.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
16 June 1995 · Roger Ebert
50*

Ebert finds the film visually striking with clever one-liners and irreverence toward the material but notes that Batman remains undefined and the villains overact, making the spectacle wearying. He calls it good bubblegum for the eyes and lighter than prior entries, though the great Batman movie is still to come.

Read the full review →
The Independent
15 July 1995
30*

The critic finds the film wholly boring and cynical, lacking the vision of Burton's entries despite better storytelling and brighter visuals. Schumacher replaces gothic gloom with commercial canniness, and while some performances and production design impress, the overall result is visual overload without narrative drive.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 June 1995 · Janet Maslin
30*

Maslin views the film as an empty-calorie product focused on spectacle and gimmicks rather than cinematic merit, with flashy but messy direction that panders to teens. She notes Val Kilmer makes an acceptable Batman but highlights unwanted innovations like nipples on the suit.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 July 2012 · TCh
30*

The review criticizes the film for feeling stale and self-conscious, with too many competing elements and a perfunctory plot, making predecessors seem more coherent.

Read the full review →
Collider
18 June 2020 · Gregory Lawrence
85*

The critic calls Batman Forever an underrated blast of joy that successfully balances silliness with serious themes of duality and trauma. They praise its bold neon aesthetics, virtuosic camera work, witty screenplay, and strong performances, especially Nicole Kidman's.

Read the full review →
Polygon
7 December 2025 · Isaac Rouse
80*

The critic argues Batman Forever is the most underrated entry and more faithful to the comics than Tim Burton's films, crediting Schumacher for respecting origins, character relationships, and Batman's no-kill rule. They highlight Val Kilmer's charming Bruce Wayne and the film's blend of camp and stakes.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
19 February 2009 · ★ · Simon Brew
20

The critic finds the film a shallow mess and the point where the rot set in for the Batman franchise, with underdeveloped villains and a major misstep in adding Robin. He singles out the overall lack of edge and control over the production for complaint.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate