Critics’ reviews

Battle Royale (2000)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 71: 5 positive, 0 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Battle Royale

71
Positive
5
Mixed
0
Negative
2
The New Yorker
3 April 2012 · Joshua Rothman
85*

Battle Royale anticipated The Hunger Games but surpasses it with extreme violence and candor that allow a more rebellious and trenchant critique of adult cruelty toward the young. Its relentless, shocking bloodshed makes it more horrifying and realistic than sanitized counterparts.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
80*

The critic highlights how the film cleverly establishes its premise and mixes satire with splatter, making the horrors alien and degrading while showing both nobility and beastliness among the characters.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 May 2008 · Scott Tobias
80*

The film is a cult classic that taps into millennial anxieties about youth through its high-concept premise of teens forced to kill each other. It succeeds as a metaphor for teenage life, generational clashes, and government control while delivering visceral action, though it has some flaws like repetitive flashbacks.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
30*

The review finds the film tedious and unsophisticated, with unrealistic violence that becomes repetitive and is aimed more at older viewers' schadenfreude than genuine thrills.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
9 February 2001 · festival review

The review notes the film's massive controversy and box-office success in Japan but finds it disappointing for foreign viewers expecting extreme gore, though it could become a cult hit abroad; praises Kitano's menacing performance while criticizing the lack of characterization and motivation.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 May 2012 · Chuck Bowen

The film squanders its potentially subversive premise with a rocky opening, inconsistent tone, and repetitive killings that become redundant. It fails to develop momentum or meaningful satire and comes across as smug rather than shocking.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 August 2001 · Peter Bradshaw

The veteran director has composed an extraordinary futuristic nightmare coloured by sadness and crazed tenderness. It is an outstanding work that explores a distinctively Japanese metaphor for imperial destiny through adolescent crushes and yearnings under horrific conditions.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
12 February 2011 · festival review · Maggie Lee

The 3D conversion of the 2000 film retains its raw visceral power and provocative take on the clash between adulthood and youth. The added effects make splatter scenes gorier but the conversion has mixed results overall as it was not originally shot for 3D.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 May 2012 · Critic’s Pick · A. O. Scott

The film is a shorter, bloodier, pulpier take on the premise later popularized by The Hunger Games, emphasizing melodrama over allegory. It tackles questions about youth and authority with earnest and impish verve.

Read the full review →
Time Out
24 May 2012 · TR

The critic finds the film doesn't shape up as effective satire or death-sport fantasy, with bloodless kills and a geriatric view of teenage life; the sole redeeming feature is Takeshi Kitano's performance.

Read the full review →
Variety
22 January 2001 · festival review · Robert Koehler

Fukasaku delivers a brutal, outrageous and timely film that reframes the story as a horrific battle imposed by adults on children, creating a nightmare vision of the near-future. It offers a visually splendid ultra-violent spectacle that sometimes lapses into the crudely sentimental and glosses over deeper motivations.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
10 December 2010 · ★★★★★ · Keir Roper-Caldbeck
100

The review calls the film a key contemporary Japanese release and a pitch-black, teasingly allegorical fable about teenagers forced into a government kill-or-be-killed contest. It highlights the unsettling mix of shocking violence, inappropriate comedy, adolescent romance and pulp philosophy as baffling and unforgettable.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
22 December 2010 · Ryan Lambie
90*

The critic describes Battle Royale as a shockingly brutal yet thought-provoking film and a savage satire on Japan's education system and governments in general. They single out director Kinji Fukasaku's personal urgency and resentment, drawn from his wartime experiences, as giving the film its powerful edge and making it an absolute masterpiece.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 August 2001 · festival review · Angus Wolfe Murray
40*

The critic calls the film the definition of the 'pornography of violence' and notes how director Kinji Fukasaku adds a political dimension to a survival game concept by having students kill their classmates rather than strangers.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate