Critics’ reviews

Beginners (2011)

17 reviews from 17 publications. Critics’ score 79: 12 positive, 5 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Beginners

79
Positive
12
Mixed
5
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Beginners, finding its reflections on grief, love and family moving without becoming sentimental. Praise clusters around Christopher Plummer’s performance, repeatedly described as warm, funny and bittersweet. The reviews also welcome the playful visual storytelling and interwoven timelines, which give the intimate material an inventive shape. Several critics value the sympathy extended to its characters, while the romance earns praise for accommodating contradictions and the fear of loss.

The reservations concern focus and emotional distance rather than the performances. The Guardian finds Oliver’s passivity and the subdued tone obstacles to engagement; Empire enjoys the film but considers it too unfocused for an unqualified recommendation. Slant Magazine, by contrast, particularly admires the fragmented approach to grief and romance. The spread runs from enthusiasm to qualified approval, with no outright negative verdicts: the principal divide is over how readily the film’s indirect storytelling draws critics in.

Slant Magazine
31 May 2011 · ★★★★/4 · Diego Semerene
100

Semerene calls the film “the real thing,” praising its humble, fragmented approach to a life in grief and love. He particularly admires how it holds human contradictions and the fear of loss within its romance.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
2 June 2011 · A- · Eric Kohn
90

Kohn praises the film as a charming, gently sympathetic portrait of a midlife crisis. He singles out Christopher Plummer’s bittersweet performance and the film’s playful visual storytelling as particular strengths.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 June 2011 · Betsy Sharkey
90*

Sharkey finds the film a continually surprising, amusing and introspective pleasure. She especially praises Christopher Plummer’s performance and the film’s inventive visual style.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 June 2011 · ★★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
88

Roger Ebert finds the film warmly affecting and thoughtful about love and family. He singles out Christopher Plummer’s performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
12 September 2010 · festival review · Peter Debruge
85*

Debruge finds the film deeply poignant, honest, and a major step forward for Mike Mills. He especially praises its revealing autobiographical intimacy and Christopher Plummer’s liberated performance.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 October 2010 · festival review · Kirk Honeycutt
80*

The critic finds the film tender, funny, and emotionally genuine in its exploration of love. He especially praises its playful visual devices and the lively performances and chemistry among the cast.

Read the full review →
Time Out
19 July 2011 · ★★★★ · Trevor Johnston
80

The review suggests the film takes time to make an impression, and the critic initially thought less of it. The available description does not identify a specific element singled out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
75*

The review finds the film charming and warmly sympathetic, with a strong emotional payoff. It especially praises Christopher Plummer’s performance and the dog’s comic presence.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 June 2011 · Anna Smith
65*

Smith finds the film entertaining and well made, though too unfocused to be a must-see. She praises Christopher Plummer’s performance and the affectionate, well-observed scenes of Hal’s final days.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
21 July 2011 · Peter Bradshaw
65*

Bradshaw finds the film poignant and cerebral, though its subdued tone and Oliver’s passivity sometimes make it hard to engage with. He singles out Christopher Plummer’s warm, intelligent performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
64*

The accessible page identifies this as a review but provides no verdict. It offers no accessible detail about what the critic praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 September 2010 · festival review · Allan Hunter
64*

The review's verdict is unavailable in the accessible page text. No specific element of praise or criticism can be verified.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 June 2011
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint from the review is available to identify.

Read the full review →
Collider
1 December 2011 · Jake Lasker
90*

Lasker calls the film one of the year’s best and recommends the DVD to fans. He praises the performances and well-defined characters for keeping the romance from becoming clichéd.

Read the full review →
Paste
3 June 2011 · Jonathan Hickman
85*

Hickman gives the film an enthusiastic verdict, praising its expansive, moving reflections on love. He especially singles out the performances of Ewan McGregor and Christopher Plummer for making the story resonate.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
20 July 2011 · Jennie Kermode
80*

Kermode finds the film an intelligent, profoundly optimistic romance that also explores how family and society shape relationships. She particularly praises its nuanced treatment of gay experience and history as part of the mainstream.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
3 June 2011 · ★★★★ · Tracy Ladd
80

The critic finds the film beautifully told, emotionally rich, and worth its unconventional journey. She especially praises Christopher Plummer’s magnetic performance and the film’s interwoven timelines.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate