Oliver (Ewan McGregor) and Anna (Mélanie Laurent) share dinner across a table with their dog
Film review

Beginners

2011 · Directed by Mike Mills · 1h 45m · MPA R

In a sentenceA Sigmund Freud costume is a sensible precaution when everyone brings this much family history to a party

Oliver Fields (Ewan McGregor) is caught between grief and the possibility of romance. Hal Fields (Christopher Plummer) and Anna Wallace (Mélanie Laurent) occupy different parts of a story that moves backwards and forwards through Oliver’s life, bringing family experience into his attempts to get close to another person. A costume party includes a guest dressed as Sigmund Freud. Oliver wants companionship, but his hesitancy and his fear of loss make it difficult to accept. Memories interrupt the prospect of a new relationship, while the people around him bring their own uncertainties about love.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Beginners is worth an evening for its humour and Christopher Plummer, though its tentative romance sometimes becomes merely hesitant. Mike Mills finds real feeling in the pauses, but leaves a few too many of them.

Beginners is a good, occasionally over-careful romance about accepting affection when grief already takes up much of the day. Mike Mills, who writes and directs, allows unhappiness to make people awkward without treating that awkwardness as a permanent excuse. We recommend it with a reservation about how often its central romance stalls. There are stretches when the hesitancy becomes trying, but the humour usually arrives before the film grows solemn.

Christopher Plummer gives Hal Fields the warmth that keeps the film from becoming too pleased with its sensitivity. He seems interested in whoever is beside him, which gives his humour an ease some of the more tentative exchanges lack. The affecting passages are easier to accept because there is also such pleasure in watching him enjoy himself. He makes the film feel more sociable whenever he appears.

Ewan McGregor has a less immediately rewarding part in Oliver Fields, whose passivity is both understandable and occasionally frustrating. He makes uncertainty believable, but the writing sometimes leaves him circling a feeling that has already been clear for several scenes. Mélanie Laurent brings enough presence to Anna Wallace to make the romance worth following, even when the attention keeps returning to Oliver’s difficulty with it. We could have spent less time considering his reluctance and more time getting to know her.

Then there is the costume party, with its Sigmund Freud disguise. We laughed, and felt fonder of the film for permitting such an obvious joke among its more careful observations. A gathering of people trying to understand one another is a reasonable place to turn up dressed as Freud. Jennifer Johnson’s costume design has a welcome sense of humour here, and the choice needs little elaboration.

Kasper Andersen’s cinematography suits the film’s gentle manner, although the attractive images occasionally make the sadness feel too comfortably arranged. Shane Valentino’s production design contributes to that impression of carefully chosen surroundings for difficult feelings. The care is appreciable, but we sometimes wished the film would risk looking less tasteful. Its more playful images help loosen things up while Oliver hesitates.

Olivier Bugge Coutté handles the movement between timelines without making the shifts feel like interruptions imposed for their own sake. They suggest how a memory can intrude on a day that was going reasonably well. That helps the fragmented structure feel appropriate to these people and their uncertainty. The music from Brian Reitzell, Roger Neill and Dave Palmer is sympathetic, though its gentleness sometimes reinforces a tenderness the performances have already supplied. At 105 minutes, the film still has room for a few pauses we would shorten.

A conventional romantic comedy might hurry these people towards being ready for one another, and we appreciate the time they are allowed. The trouble comes when patience becomes repetition, particularly around Oliver. Even then, the cast make spending time with these people agreeable enough that we forgive more than we would on the page. Choose it for a quiet evening, and allow Christopher Plummer to be the most sociable person present.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
12
Mixed
5
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Beginners, finding its reflections on grief, love and family moving without becoming sentimental. Praise clusters around Christopher Plummer’s performance, repeatedly described as warm, funny and bittersweet. The reviews also welcome the playful visual storytelling and interwoven timelines, which give the intimate material an inventive shape. Several critics value the sympathy extended to its characters, while the romance earns praise for accommodating contradictions and the fear of loss.

The reservations concern focus and emotional distance rather than the performances. The Guardian finds Oliver’s passivity and the subdued tone obstacles to engagement; Empire enjoys the film but considers it too unfocused for an unqualified recommendation. Slant Magazine, by contrast, particularly admires the fragmented approach to grief and romance. The spread runs from enthusiasm to qualified approval, with no outright negative verdicts: the principal divide is over how readily the film’s indirect storytelling draws critics in.

Slant Magazine
31 May 2011 · ★★★★/4 · Diego Semerene
100

Semerene calls the film “the real thing,” praising its humble, fragmented approach to a life in grief and love. He particularly admires how it holds human contradictions and the fear of loss within its romance.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
2 June 2011 · A- · Eric Kohn
90

Kohn praises the film as a charming, gently sympathetic portrait of a midlife crisis. He singles out Christopher Plummer’s bittersweet performance and the film’s playful visual storytelling as particular strengths.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 June 2011 · Betsy Sharkey
90*

Sharkey finds the film a continually surprising, amusing and introspective pleasure. She especially praises Christopher Plummer’s performance and the film’s inventive visual style.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 June 2011 · ★★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
88

Roger Ebert finds the film warmly affecting and thoughtful about love and family. He singles out Christopher Plummer’s performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Variety
12 September 2010 · festival review · Peter Debruge
85*

Debruge finds the film deeply poignant, honest, and a major step forward for Mike Mills. He especially praises its revealing autobiographical intimacy and Christopher Plummer’s liberated performance.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 October 2010 · festival review · Kirk Honeycutt
80*

The critic finds the film tender, funny, and emotionally genuine in its exploration of love. He especially praises its playful visual devices and the lively performances and chemistry among the cast.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Beginners worth watching?
Beginners is worth watching for its humour, Christopher Plummer’s warmth and its patient treatment of grief and romance; we scored it 79. We recommend it for a quiet evening, provided a hesitant love story appeals: the cast make the company agreeable, but Oliver’s repeated uncertainty can become trying.
How long is Beginners, and what is it rated?
Beginners runs 1h 45m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a drama and romance film.
Where can I watch Beginners in the US?
Beginners is streaming on Netflix in the US, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Beginners, and is it suitable for children?
Beginners has a UK 15 certificate, so it is not suitable for children under 15. Its treatment of grief and hesitant romance suggests an emotionally adult drama, but we cannot offer a specific warning about violence or frightening material from the details available; the certificate remains the clearest guide for younger viewers.
How does Beginners compare to Late Spring?
Beginners is the more gently comic choice beside Late Spring, though we recommend the latter more strongly for its deeply affecting father-and-daughter drama. Both patiently explore family affection complicating romance or marriage; Beginners sometimes lets hesitation become repetition, while Late Spring makes familiar family pressures painful to watch, with a deliberate pace that also requires patience.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2012

Won
Best Supporting Actor

If you liked this, try…

  1. 20th Century Women (2016) · not on Fi1m yetAnother tender family portrait that allows affection and exasperation equal space.

  2. Late Spring (1949, Fi1m 92)For another patient account of family affection complicating the prospect of marriage.

  3. The Lunchbox (2013) · not on Fi1m yetA hesitant romance that understands how much can depend on small courtesies.

  4. Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore (1974) · not on Fi1m yetRomance meets the practical business of starting again, without tidying everything away.

  5. All or Nothing (2002) · not on Fi1m yetFamily unhappiness handled with less whimsy and an equally serious interest in kindness.