Critics’ reviews

Best in Show (2000)

10 reviews from 10 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 4 so far.

Back to our review of Best in Show

4 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
1
Negative
0
The AV Club
29 September 2000 · Scott Tobias
85*

The review calls the film an unbridled success that recycles the mockumentary formula effectively for affectionate caricature of dog-show obsessives. It singles out the cast's warmth in making stereotypes inclusive and Fred Willard's hilarious announcer turn as a highlight.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
80*

Best In Show is a worthy addition to canine movies that forensically lays bare the foibles of human owners rather than mocking the dogs, with owners spiraling out of control in obsessions while their pets look on. Guest's improvised mockumentary style captures fresh, real-time conversations and ultimately evokes compassion for the characters.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
55*

The film is watchable and more intelligent than many recent comedies but lacks the imagination, edge and memorable moments of Guest's earlier mockumentaries, making it hit and miss overall. It offers gentle satirical wit on absurd characters at a dog show but suffers from déjà vu and one-dimensional stereotypes.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
27 September 2000 · Kenneth Turan

The critic calls the film a low-key but sharp and amusing mockumentary whose humor fits the frenetic world of dog shows, noting it has both bark and bite despite being more hit-or-miss than Guest's prior work. The irrepressibly buffoonish play-by-play announcer is singled out as the standout element.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 March 2001 · Peter Bradshaw

The dog-show mockumentary is a little gem of a comedy structured around real laughs and gags, using talking-head interviews and pseudo-vérité footage to follow the Mayflower Dog Show competitors and their pooches.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
11 September 2000 · Kirk Honeycutt

The critic finds the mockumentary frequently sidesplitting, with neurotic human owners outshining their dogs and fresh takes on familiar gags. Specific praise goes to the ensemble's improvisational skill, the comic costumes and sets, and standout bits from the TV commentators.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 September 2000 · Critic's Pick · Stephen Holden

The critic finds the film every bit as funny as Guest's previous mockumentary Waiting for Guffman, praising its clever improvisational caricatures of dog owners and their neuroses. The yuppie couple and the milquetoast husband with his hot-blooded wife are singled out for their hilarious scenes.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh

The film explores how pets resemble their owners through a mockumentary following contestants at a dog show, blending observation and interviews in a style reminiscent of Spinal Tap but with gentler gags. It excels in caricaturing social archetypes and features standout comic turns, particularly from Fred Willard.

Read the full review →
Variety
11 September 2000 · festival review · Eddie Cockrell

The critic describes the film as barkingly funny, praising how it walks a fine line between cruelty and affection in showcasing improvisations on American types and their neuroses. The only cavil noted is a predictable rhythmic rut in the structure of the segments.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
9 March 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
80*

The critic praises the film's character-driven American satire and the fresh, improvised humour from its ensemble cast. The mockumentary style is highlighted as a vibrant example of screen comedy beyond mainstream fare.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate