Critics’ reviews

Big Fish (2003)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 58: 4 positive, 0 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Big Fish

58
Positive
4
Mixed
0
Negative
5

The reviews are sharply divided on Big Fish, with a slight lean towards disappointment rather than a settled consensus. Praise centres on Burton’s fantastical imagery and the warmth of his tall tales: supporters find that his visual imagination serves a touching story about family, truth and the value of make-believe. Empire welcomes the connection between his familiar style and broader emotional concerns, while the Evening Standard singles out Albert Finney’s range and emotional force.

The disagreement is largely over whether that warmth earns its sentimentality. Slant Magazine finds the film moving without being manipulative, but detractors repeatedly describe the fantasy as soft, the father-son drama as laboured and Burton’s usual darkness as diminished. The spread is wide: admirers embrace the gentleness that others find dull. Time Out raises a distinct objection to the treatment of history and gender roles, alongside its dissatisfaction with the humour and emotion.

The AV Club
9 December 2003 · A- · Nathan Rabin
90

Burton rebounds strongly with a visual feast and emotional power that recalls Edward Scissorhands. The film makes a strong case for the life-affirming power of make-believe through its generous spirit and fantastical storytelling.

Read the full review →
Empire
· William Thomas
85*

The film aligns Burton's visual style with a story that has more than one foot in the real world, resulting in charming, witty and warm-hearted filmmaking. It is praised for transcending Burton's usual world to connect with wider emotional concerns about family and truth.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 November 2003 · Ed Gonzalez
85*

Big Fish is a sentimental but never manipulative nonsecular tall tale about the desire to live with wonderment. Burton's fantastical set pieces and images, saturated with love, single out the power of myth over reason in illuminating family connections and spirituality.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Will Self
80*

Burton reaches an apogee with this tale of tall tales and father-son reconciliation. Albert Finney's performance is singled out as the standout, delivering a broad range of emotions that moves even a jaded critic.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Brian Pendreigh
40

The film drifts colourfully along but ultimately lacks the edge that made Edward Scissorhands so powerful and strange.

Read the full review →
The Independent
25 January 2004 · Nicholas Barber
40*

The critic finds the fantastical flashbacks full of expected wonders but too fluffy and innocuous to grip tightly. The present-day father-son reconciliation theme is overdone and the film is ultimately a disappointment.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 January 2004 · Peter Bradshaw
35*

Bradshaw finds the film not weird enough, with Burton's fantasy decaffeinated into a cutesy family drama that lacks edge or dark side. He criticizes the sentimental ending and calls the result a tiny bit dull.

Read the full review →
Time Out
29 February 2012 · GA
30*

The critic finds the film not funny, illuminating, insightful or moving, criticizing its portrayal of history and gender roles.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
10 December 2003 · Manohla Dargis

Burton's wistful film about fathers, sons and tall tales showcases his imagination in fantastical scenarios, making it the straightest entry in his repertoire. The shift to family melodrama and the son's reproach drags it down, though Jessica Lange brightens those sections.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
1 December 2003

A gently whimsical tale of reconciliation and fabulism that is the director's most sentimental piece to date, repositioning him as a mainstream filmmaker.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
8 December 2003 · Anthony Lane

The film risks mush with its sentimental picaresque and nervous fantasizing that undercuts Burton's usual wit, feeling like a softening up rather than growth. Some Burton-esque moments stand out, but the overall approach to tall tales and the circus trope disappoints.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 December 2003 · A. O. Scott

The critic finds the magical-realist fable thin and soft, with unpersuasive inventions despite some startling scenes. Burton's visual sensibility is praised but the storytelling falters and the film proves ultimately forgettable.

Read the full review →
The Times
25 January 2004 · One star · Cosmo Landesman

Landesman says Burton tries too hard to repeat the past and the film ends up crushed under the weight of its own whimsy, with the father/son conflict never taking off. He calls it a comeback attempt that falls flat.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
22 January 2004 · ★½ · Angus Wolfe Murray
30

The critic laments the film's excessive sentimentality, which he believes has stripped Burton of his signature darkness, and declares it a failure on every level that wastes its talented cast. He singles out the dysfunctional father-son relationship and the jarring contrast between the realistic and fantastical elements for particular criticism.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate