
Most critics respond warmly to Black Swan’s feverish mixture of ballet drama and psychological horror, with praise concentrated on Natalie Portman’s physically committed performance as a dancer consumed by perfection. Darren Aronofsky’s direction also draws approval for its intensity, mirror imagery and willingness to push backstage anxiety into bodily horror. Supporters find the excess gripping, disturbing and sometimes entertaining, accepting that plausibility is not the film’s chief concern.
The spread is wide, however, and the same hysteria that excites admirers alienates detractors. Reservations centre on thin characterisation, overwrought symbolism and a treatment of artistic ambition that some find punishing without being insightful. The Los Angeles Times finds Aronofsky’s approach bludgeoning, while the Financial Times objects more fundamentally to what it sees as a lack of understanding or affection for ballet. Even among less persuaded critics, Portman’s performance and the visual ambition retain some support.
E
Empire
27 July 2009 · festival review · Dan Jolin
85*
Aronofsky delivers another impressive, technically masterful film that pairs physical intensity with psychological depth, highlighted by Portman's career-best performance.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
85*
A full-out Gothic horror about bodily and mental breakdown, masterfully shot and performed, with Portman giving an Oscar-worthy display in this Grand Guignol tale of performance pain.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
1 September 2010 · festival review
85*
Aronofsky delivers an enthralling, alternately disturbing and exhilarating dark study of a mentally fragile performer obsessed with perfection that ranks among the year's most exciting films. Natalie Portman's transformative lead performance as the repressed ballerina is a standout highlight.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
20 January 2011 · Xan Brooks
85*
The critic praises Darren Aronofsky’s ballet psychodrama as a gripping, over-the-top study of female breakdown and artistic obsession, highlighting Natalie Portman’s tremendous performance as the fragile, unraveling ballerina Nina.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★★ · Damon Wise
80
Aronofsky's dark, hypnotic study of obsession in the ballet world is exhilarating and disturbing, with bravura direction and a mesmerising performance from Natalie Portman that overcomes occasional lapses in logic and originality.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
18 January 2011 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80
The film is high-class trash that works best if viewers surrender to its hysteria, paranoia and emotional excesses rather than logic. Aronofsky creates an orgy of fun reflecting the protagonist's madness through mirrors and lurid imagery.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
30 December 2010 · Jamie Graham
80*
Aronofsky fuses psychodrama, horror and backstage elements into a stylish, exhilarating monument to cinema obsessed with performance and mirrors, buoyed by Portman's standout turn.
Read the full review →I
The Independent
23 January 2011 · Nicholas Barber
65*
An effective mix of soap opera and Gothic horror that works best in its unhinged final stretch, though characters remain archetypes and Portman's arc has limited room to develop.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
3 December 2010 · Kenneth Turan
40*
The critic views the film as high-art trash and a shameless mix of The Red Shoes and Roger Corman that prizes hysteria, finding it hard to enjoy due to Aronofsky's bludgeoning sledgehammer style despite a plausible idea about perfection's toll.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
14 October 2010 · Kirk Honeycutt
40*
The critic finds the attempt to blend horror-thriller elements with the world of ballet unsuccessful and preposterous. They single out the audacity and visual complexity of Aronofsky's approach, along with strong performances, as elements that make it a guilty pleasure despite its flaws.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
6 December 2010 · David Denby
40*
The critic calls the film a luridly beautiful farrago mixing ballet tensions with sex, blood, and horror flourishes, praising its controlled savagery and aestheticism but criticizing it as pompous, self-glorifying, and unpleasant in its interpretation of an artist's task.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
2 December 2010 · Apollinaire Scherr
20*
The critic finds the film odious and lacking in affection for ballet, complaining that Aronofsky mixes up the characters in Swan Lake and focuses on torture and self-destruction without insight into the art form.
Read the full review →F
Film Comment
· José Teodoro
The critic describes Black Swan as a horror film that gradually reveals itself, linking it to The Wrestler as a companion piece while noting its sensationalistic approach akin to De Palma's work rather than Bergman.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
3 December 2010 · Critic’s Pick · Manohla Dargis
The critic describes the film as a witchy brew of madness and cunning centered on a ballerina's drive and unraveling, praising Natalie Portman's smashing, bruising performance. Aronofsky is noted for mixing highbrow art-house elements with sleazy exploitation savvy and genre riffs.
Read the full review →V
Variety
1 September 2010 · festival review · Peter Debruge
The critic calls it a wicked, sexy and ultimately devastating study of a young dancer's all-consuming ambition, praising Natalie Portman's courageous turn and Aronofsky's exploration of the brutal ballet world as a complement to The Wrestler.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
20 January 2011 · ★★★★★ · N P
100
The critic calls Black Swan a masterpiece of obsession and its consequences, a perfect cap to Aronofsky's independent work. They single out Natalie Portman's incredible, fully inhabited performance as the key to the film's believable transformation and intensity.
Read the full review →C
Collider
3 December 2010 · A · Matt Goldberg
95
The critic finds Black Swan a brilliant and unforgettable psychological thriller that demands repeat viewings. They single out Natalie Portman's astounding performance as one of the best of the year.
Read the full review →/
/Film
6 September 2010 · 9.5/10 · Peter Sciretta
95
The critic hails the film as a brilliant mind fuck and one of the boldest studio films in years, a psychological horror-thriller that is unlike anything else. They single out Natalie Portman's transformative performance and the film's erotic and disturbing imagery balanced with realism.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
23 October 2010 · James Benefield
85*
The critic calls the film as elegant and overblown as ballet itself, an ambitious and accomplished horror-drama-psychosexual thriller that revels in its extremes. They single out the bold central performance from Natalie Portman and the revelation of Barbara Hershey as the suffocating mother.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
18 January 2011 · Ian Gilchrist
75*
The critic describes the film as a vivid and gripping mix of psycho-thriller, horror and backstage drama that is thoroughly entertaining but falls short of masterpiece status. They praise Natalie Portman's committed and physical lead performance while noting that director Aronofsky has yet to top Requiem for a Dream.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
2 December 2010 · Leah Rozen
60*
The critic calls the film fascinating and fun to watch but ultimately silly, describing it as high art played as high camp. They single out Natalie Portman's complex and dedicated performance for praise while faulting the luridly lunatic tone and overwrought symbolism toward the end.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate