Critics’ reviews

Blade (1998)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 60: 3 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Blade

60
Positive
3
Mixed
2
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards qualified approval of Blade, with praise concentrated on its visual style, action and Wesley Snipes’ performance. Supporters find the exaggerated shadows and camera angles well suited to comic-book filmmaking, while Snipes gives the hero a commanding presence and, for some, a welcome sadness. The opening sequence draws particular praise, and the more enthusiastic accounts also credit Stephen Dorff and the inventive stunt work. Even some mixed reviews find it slick and intermittently diverting.

The spread is wide, however, with disagreement extending to the fights themselves: Empire finds them effective and energetically handled, while Time Out calls them messy and sadistic. Reservations cluster around thin storytelling, unconvincing computer effects and silliness that weakens the later action. For the harshest critics, the gore becomes wearying, and too little attention goes to the hero’s inner life to provide either emotional involvement or suspense.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Darren Bignell
75*

The critic finds it slick, energetic fun with effective action sequences and strong performances from Snipes and Dorff, though occasionally uneven with some ropy CGI. Praises the thrilling opener and Norrington's handling of stunts and fights.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
21 August 1998 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert praises the film's high visual style, extreme camera angles, and exaggerated shadows as a strong example of comic-book filmmaking. He singles out Wesley Snipes' performance for giving the superhero an edge of vulnerability and sadness.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 August 1998 · Stephen Holden
60*

Holden describes the film as a hyperkinetic, cartoonish action yarn drenched in fake blood that quickly abandons its satirical opening for futuristic vampire battles. He notes Snipes is comfortable in the limited heroic role but finds the story more interested in effects than depth.

Read the full review →
Variety
20 August 1998 · Dennis Harvey
50*

Harvey finds the film slick and diverting in spots but increasingly silly as it struggles to blend horror, superhero fantasy, and action. He singles out the strong opening club sequence for praise while criticizing the lack of suspense, emotional thread, and convincing effects.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · NF
30*

The critic finds the techno-vampire film spoiled by weak storytelling and flashy computer-game visuals similar to the director's earlier work. Too little time is spent on the hero's tortured soul, with the best scenes going to the villains and the fights coming across as messily choreographed and sadistic.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
20 August 1998 · David Hunter

The critic finds the film an excessively gory and unpleasant reworking of the vampire genre with little crossover appeal or substance. The one-note story centers on a grimacing Wesley Snipes character in an overwrought two-hour slaughter that drags on without subtlety or restraint from the director.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 May 2009 · Stephen Carty
75*

The critic praises the film's kinetic action sequences, inventive stunts, and Wesley Snipes' commanding performance as Blade, along with strong supporting turns from Stephen Dorff and Kris Kristofferson. The climax is singled out as a letdown due to over-the-top silliness that undermines the earlier strengths.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate