Film review

Blade

1998 · Directed by Stephen Norrington · 2h 01m · MPA R

In a sentenceWesley Snipes gives the vampires something to worry about, even when the special effects do not

HorrorAction

Blade (Wesley Snipes) wages war against an army of immortals. A nightclub encounter introduces a conflict played out through vampire attacks and physical combat, with Blade taking on enemies from the supernatural world. Stephen Dorff plays Deacon Frost, Kris Kristofferson is Whistler and N’Bushe Wright plays Karen, alongside Donal Logue as Quinn and Udo Kier as Dragonetti. Directed by Stephen Norrington and written by David S. Goyer, the film combines vampire horror with action, following a warrior whose grim appearance gives little away about his vulnerability.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Wesley Snipes is commanding in Stephen Norrington’s violent vampire film, and the fights give him plenty to do. Thin storytelling and unconvincing effects matter, but action-horror enthusiasts should have a good evening.

Blade is a good action film with a thin vampire story, and its success rests largely on Wesley Snipes. Stephen Norrington wants horror that can sustain repeated physical confrontations, with a hero strong enough to hold our attention when the writing runs out of things for him to say. That is a sensible approach to this material, and Snipes makes it work for longer than we might expect. At 121 minutes, though, it gives itself more time than the story can use.

Snipes plays Blade with the sternness the role demands, but there is enough sadness in the performance to prevent the pose becoming tiresome. His control matters: he can suggest that violence costs this man something without stopping the action to insist on it. We wanted more of that vulnerability, which David S. Goyer’s screenplay leaves largely to the actor. The character stays interesting even when the film has little interest in developing him.

We were thrilled by the opening club sequence, where the harsh angles and heavy shadows make the violence feel unusually nasty. Cinematographer Theo van de Sande pushes those angles and shadows hard, and the pictures can stand the treatment. Kirk M. Petruccelli’s production design gives the club a theatrical feel that suits this much visual exaggeration. Norrington gives the sequence a confidence that makes the shakier passages later on more frustrating.

Paul Rubell’s editing is strongest when it keeps the stunts moving without making every encounter feel identical. There is enough energy in the fights to forgive some unevenness, although the film has difficulty sustaining interest between them. Mark Isham’s score helps maintain that aggressive mood, but makes less impression than the physical performances. The music cannot do much about the missing suspense, and the action becomes less involving when we stop worrying about what might happen next.

Stephen Dorff gives Deacon Frost enough assurance to keep Snipes from becoming the only person worth watching. Kris Kristofferson is welcome company as Whistler, and both actors make the film easier to enjoy than its unrelenting violence might suggest. Goyer does less well at connecting that violence to anything we can care about for long. The film keeps arranging another encounter when a little more attention to Blade himself would have helped.

The effects are the other substantial weakness, especially when the computer-generated work has to carry the excitement. Physical action has given the film a useful solidity, so the unconvincing images are hard to overlook. As horror, it offers too little suspense to make the violence frightening for long. The increasingly silly plotting would be easier to enjoy if the film did not depend so heavily on our taking its threats seriously.

Still, Snipes makes a persuasive reason to stay, and the early confidence is not wholly lost when the story falters. We would recommend Blade to anyone who wants vampire horror delivered through hard, energetic fights and can tolerate some unconvincing digital work. Its 18 certificate is worth taking seriously; the gore is not incidental. Anyone squeamish about blood should make other plans.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

60
Positive
3
Mixed
2
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards qualified approval of Blade, with praise concentrated on its visual style, action and Wesley Snipes’ performance. Supporters find the exaggerated shadows and camera angles well suited to comic-book filmmaking, while Snipes gives the hero a commanding presence and, for some, a welcome sadness. The opening sequence draws particular praise, and the more enthusiastic accounts also credit Stephen Dorff and the inventive stunt work. Even some mixed reviews find it slick and intermittently diverting.

The spread is wide, however, with disagreement extending to the fights themselves: Empire finds them effective and energetically handled, while Time Out calls them messy and sadistic. Reservations cluster around thin storytelling, unconvincing computer effects and silliness that weakens the later action. For the harshest critics, the gore becomes wearying, and too little attention goes to the hero’s inner life to provide either emotional involvement or suspense.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Darren Bignell
75*

The critic finds it slick, energetic fun with effective action sequences and strong performances from Snipes and Dorff, though occasionally uneven with some ropy CGI. Praises the thrilling opener and Norrington's handling of stunts and fights.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
21 August 1998 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert praises the film's high visual style, extreme camera angles, and exaggerated shadows as a strong example of comic-book filmmaking. He singles out Wesley Snipes' performance for giving the superhero an edge of vulnerability and sadness.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 August 1998 · Stephen Holden
60*

Holden describes the film as a hyperkinetic, cartoonish action yarn drenched in fake blood that quickly abandons its satirical opening for futuristic vampire battles. He notes Snipes is comfortable in the limited heroic role but finds the story more interested in effects than depth.

Read the full review →
Variety
20 August 1998 · Dennis Harvey
50*

Harvey finds the film slick and diverting in spots but increasingly silly as it struggles to blend horror, superhero fantasy, and action. He singles out the strong opening club sequence for praise while criticizing the lack of suspense, emotional thread, and convincing effects.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · NF
30*

The critic finds the techno-vampire film spoiled by weak storytelling and flashy computer-game visuals similar to the director's earlier work. Too little time is spent on the hero's tortured soul, with the best scenes going to the villains and the fights coming across as messily choreographed and sadistic.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
20 August 1998 · David Hunter

The critic finds the film an excessively gory and unpleasant reworking of the vampire genre with little crossover appeal or substance. The one-note story centers on a grimacing Wesley Snipes character in an overwrought two-hour slaughter that drags on without subtlety or restraint from the director.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

MTV Movie Award for Best Villain, 1999

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Villain

If you liked this, try…

Near Dark poster

Near Dark

1987 · For vampires who make immortality look grubby, exhausting and unpleasantly physical

A Chinese Ghost Story poster

A Chinese Ghost Story

1987 · Supernatural danger and acrobatic action, with more room for romance

The Crow poster

The Crow

1994 · A wounded action hero and oppressive shadows, with grief nearer the surface

Attack the Block poster

Attack the Block

2011 · Another collision of creature horror, streetwise humour and decisive action

Train to Busan poster

Train to Busan

2016 · Ferocious supernatural action that gives its endangered people more attention