Four men on horseback riding across open grassland in a line
Film review

Bone Tomahawk

2015 · Directed by Steven Craig Zahler · 2h 13m

In a sentenceWe would happily listen to Richard Jenkins all night, provided someone kept watch

In the Old West, Sheriff Franklin Hunt (Kurt Russell) leads a rescue mission into country held by cannibals. His companions are Arthur O’Dwyer (Patrick Wilson), Chicory (Richard Jenkins) and John Brooder (Matthew Fox). Together, the four men set out to recover captives and return them to safety. The pursuit brings their different temperaments into close quarters, with talk and disagreements occupying the stretches between danger. As they travel further into the frontier, the party has to hold together long enough to reach the people they have come to save, against opponents who threaten to turn the rescuers into victims.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

A patient, darkly funny western whose cast makes the horror count. The journey drags and its frontier politics are thin, but the company is worth keeping if graphic violence is not a barrier.

Bone Tomahawk is a good western with enough affection for its characters to make its horror hurt. Steven Craig Zahler takes his time over a rescue mission, allowing the men undertaking it to be amusing, awkward and recognisably different before asking us to fear for them. The combination works, and the patience usually pays off. At 133 minutes it also needs a firmer trim, though we would sooner lose a stretch of the journey than a conversation involving Richard Jenkins.

Kurt Russell gives Sheriff Franklin Hunt the authority this sort of expedition requires, without making him seem too grand to share it with the others. Patrick Wilson makes Arthur O’Dwyer’s determination feel costly, while Matthew Fox gives John Brooder a prickliness that stops the group becoming comfortably companionable. Richard Jenkins, as Chicory, supplies the most pleasure. We laughed at his contributions because he makes the wandering talk sound like something he needs to say, rather than a writer waiting to collect a laugh.

Steven Craig Zahler’s dialogue lets these men disagree without reducing every exchange to a contest for the sharpest line. Their talk has detours, and those detours help establish whose company we would welcome and whose we would endure. This matters in a rescue western: the travelling cannot simply be a delay before the shooting. The film understands the pleasure of listening to people who have spent enough time together to irritate one another, even when there is more pressing business.

Benji Bakshi’s cinematography gives the actors room, with a relaxed camera that allows the conversation to hold our attention. The plainness can become flatness; there are stretches when we would welcome a more expressive image. Freddy Waff’s production design is similarly unobtrusive, keeping the frontier setting from becoming a display of attractive period objects. Both choices serve the performances, though the images do not always supply enough interest when the talk subsides.

Editors Fred Raskin and Greg D’Auria preserve the leisurely rhythm, and the pauses often give an ordinary remark time to become funny. They are less successful at making every stretch of the pursuit feel necessary. The journey begins to drag because the film has already established how these men get along and still grants their exchanges the same generous allowance. Jeff Herriott and Steven Craig Zahler’s restrained music helps: it leaves us space to attend to the voices instead of continually announcing that trouble is coming.

The horror is severe, and we will not describe what gives it that severity. What matters is that the film has first persuaded us to care about the people exposed to it; the brutality does not arrive among interchangeable victims. Its treatment of the cannibal antagonists is less satisfying, and the old western division between civilised rescuers and monstrous outsiders deserves more scrutiny than it gets. There is intelligence in the men’s conversations, but it does not settle the unease around that familiar arrangement.

Anyone after a brisk evening of frontier action should choose something else. This film expects us to enjoy a digression and tolerate a long wait, then accept a degree of violence that conversation cannot soften. For viewers who can do all three, we recommend it; anyone squeamish should take the 18 certificate seriously.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

72
Positive
20
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics welcome Bone Tomahawk as a patient, character-led western whose horror is made more disturbing by the time spent with its travelling companions. Praise centres on the ensemble, particularly Kurt Russell and Richard Jenkins, and on Zahler’s dry, eccentric dialogue. The favourable reviews find that the unhurried conversations build attachment and tension, while the shifts between humour and brutality largely hold together. Several also credit the direction with treating the characters seriously rather than merely preparing them for violence.

The spread is wide despite the strongly positive majority. Even sympathetic reviews question the pace and tonal control, while the graphic violence proves more divisive. The Times finds that brutality undoes the quality preceding it. Racial politics produce another disagreement: Little White Lies reads a critique of imperialist impulses, whereas Slant Magazine argues that the film evades the racism in its premise. These objections go beyond reservations about its leisurely storytelling.

Financial Times
18 February 2016 · Nigel Andrews
85*

The critic calls it an amazing film that strobes between light and dark, sublime and ridiculous. It is praised for its B-movie energy, character strokes, and absurdist-philosophical shift into a Beckett-like final act.

Read the full review →
Empire
15 February 2016 · ★★★★ · Kim Newman
80

The critic praises this gruesome Western-horror mash-up as a strong prairie stew blending The Searchers and Cannibal Ferox, with strong character work and witty dialogue among the posse members.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 October 2015 · Robert Abele
80*

A grim, witty horror-western with a humming genre intelligence, where Zahler balances shaggy droll talk and midnight-movie violence in a pokey character study. The cast sells the discursive indulgences and the director’s ear for period sensibilities is clinically effective.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
23 October 2015 · Brian Tallerico
80*

The film is a sturdy Western that shifts into horror, with strong performances and witty dialogue from a talented cast led by Kurt Russell. Zahler’s confident direction and script make the genre mash-up work despite some self-indulgent pacing and intense violence.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 October 2015 · festival review
80*

The critic calls it a cult item par excellence that is disturbingly tense, hyper-violent and destined for an adoring fanboy following. The performances, especially Kurt Russell's grizzle and gravitas, are singled out as distinguishing the piece amid its low-budget ambition.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 February 2016
80*

The critic sees cult potential in this well-made, macabre and violent western-horror debut. It is a pulpy, scary twist on The Searchers carried off with seriousness, highlighted by strong performances including Kurt Russell.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Bone Tomahawk worth watching?
Bone Tomahawk is worth watching for anyone who enjoys a talkative, patient western and can stomach severe violence, and we scored it 78. Kurt Russell, Patrick Wilson, Matthew Fox and Richard Jenkins make the long journey good company, though at 133 minutes it drags. Anyone wanting brisk frontier action should choose something else.
How long is Bone Tomahawk, and what is it rated?
Bone Tomahawk runs 2h 13m. It is a drama and horror film.
Where can I watch Bone Tomahawk in Thailand?
Bone Tomahawk is not on any streaming or rental service in Thailand at the moment. It is available in 24 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Bone Tomahawk, and is it suitable for children?
Bone Tomahawk is not suitable for children, and it carries an 18 certificate in the UK for good reason. The horror is severe and the film has first made us care about the men exposed to it, so the brutality lands hard. Squeamish adults should take the certificate seriously; teenagers should look elsewhere.
How does Bone Tomahawk compare to The Night of the Hunter?
Bone Tomahawk and The Night of the Hunter both build rural terror slowly and leave room for warmth among the menace, but the older film is the stranger and the better of the two. Laughton's Depression fairy tale unsettles without graphic violence; Zahler's western relies on it. Viewers who want the dread without the gore should start with Laughton.
What should I watch after Bone Tomahawk?
After Bone Tomahawk, try The Proposition (2005, Fi1m 79): An Australian western that subjects claims of civilisation to a punishing examination. Then The Night of the Hunter (1955, Fi1m 91): Patient rural terror, with room for human tenderness amid the menace.

Cast

Awards

IFFR audience award, 2016

Nominated
IFFR audience award

Sitges Film Festival Best Director award, 2014

Won
Sitges Film Festival Best Director award

If you liked this, try…

  1. Ravenous (1999) · not reviewed yetAnother frontier appetite problem, with black humour and a more feverish atmosphere.

  2. The Proposition (2005, Fi1m 79)An Australian western that subjects claims of civilisation to a punishing examination.

  3. The Great Silence (1968) · not reviewed yetSnow replaces dust in a western with little faith in frontier justice.

  4. The Night of the Hunter (1955, Fi1m 91)Patient rural terror, with room for human tenderness amid the menace.

  5. Bacurau (2019) · not reviewed yetA Brazilian community faces outsiders in another patient, politically sharper collision of genres.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever