Critics’ reviews

Breathless (1960)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 87: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Breathless

87
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Breathless, with praise centred on Godard’s restless filmmaking and the energy of its young leads. The jump cuts, handheld camerawork and jazz score draw repeated admiration, as does the film’s freedom with American gangster conventions. The reviews tend to treat its formal experiments as a continuing source of pleasure rather than merely a historical achievement. Belmondo and Seberg also earn praise for making the lovers’ intimacy and disconnection compelling.

The differences concern how well that freshness lasts and how welcoming the film is. The Financial Times finds that it looks a little dated, while still feeling its impact. Variety admires both leads but notes Seberg’s limited emotional range. Elsewhere, the wilful style and abrasive characters are largely treated as strengths rather than obstacles. The spread is broadly enthusiastic: reservations qualify the praise without becoming a sustained case against the film.

Time Out
22 June 2010 · ★★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
100

The review celebrates the film’s enduring radical energy, cocky youthfulness and stylistic innovations like jump cuts and handheld shooting fifty years on, calling it confrontational, modern and simply cool despite (or because of) its roots in B-movie noir. It notes Godard’s own cameo and the film’s wilful, uningratiating nature.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
90*

The piece highlights the film's brilliant filmmaking, innovative mosaic of invention, and enduring pertinence of its characters and style on its 50th anniversary re-release.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 June 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The rerelease offers a chance to marvel at the film's pure, raw, chaotic newness and the unschooled quality of Godard's filmmaking. The whole movie is one continuous, inspired cine-jazz solo that perfectly captures what it feels like to be young and in love.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
80*

The critic praises the film's innovative editing, jazz score, references, and energy as an exciting homage to American gangster films while critiquing them; it remains one of Godard's finest.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
2 November 2020 · Nigel Andrews
80*

Breathless was once a smack in the face and still has a smarting impact, though it looks a little dated on re-encounter. It is a kind of masterpiece that pioneered changes in world moviemaking through its fresh, new style.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 March 1960

The critic praises Godard’s debut as a genuine auteur film made with complete independence, noting its provocative rejection of traditional techniques, controlled use of montage and jump cuts, and its anarchic, pitiless portrayal of immoral characters in a modern, Americanised Paris. The dialogue and direction are highlighted for their literary quality and startling revelations.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
4 February 1961 · Roger Angell

The review calls the film the most brilliant and exciting of the season for its nervous, fluid camerawork and intimate portrayal of nihilistic young characters. It singles out the long bedroom scene and performances by Belmondo and Seberg for making the disconnected lives comprehensible and compelling.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 May 2010 · A.O. Scott

The piece reflects on the film's lasting radical impact as a break from prior cinema, noting audience reactions at the time and its status as a modern art touchstone. It highlights the central performances of Belmondo and Seberg in the lovers-on-the-run story.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1959 · Gene Moskowitz

The critic notes the film's personal style influenced by American thrillers while highlighting its own innovations like jump cuts and candid tone. Belmondo is praised as excellent in the lead, with Seberg effective in her role despite limited emotive range.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
25 June 2010 · Jon Lyus
85*

The critic champions the film's life and vivacity on its 50th anniversary re-release, urging viewers to experience the restored print. They single out Godard's playfulness, the effortless charm of the leads, and the film's freedom in breaking cinematic tradition for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
25 June 2010 · Jennie Kermode
80*

The critic calls it a visually innovative film and praises Godard for a masterful job with a witty script that holds attention amid tension from boredom. They single out the balance struck between the central characters and the effective use of jump cuts.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate