Critics’ reviews

Bride of Frankenstein (1935)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 86: 14 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Bride of Frankenstein

86
Positive
14
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is firmly positive: all fourteen reviews praise James Whale’s sequel, and several judge it an improvement on the original Frankenstein. Praise centres on Whale’s handling of horror, macabre humour and sympathy for the creature, supported by Gothic sets, expressive photography and inventive art direction. Boris Karloff’s emotional depth draws repeated admiration, while Ernest Thesiger’s flamboyant Pretorius and Elsa Lanchester’s performance give the critics plenty to enjoy beyond the monster himself.

The differences are chiefly in enthusiasm and emphasis, rather than substantial objections. Some reviews concentrate on satire, camp and subversion; others stress the creature’s humanity and the story’s moral complexity. Variety supplies the clearest reservation, wishing the Bride had more screen time despite admiring Lanchester’s work. The praise ranges from warm approval to much stronger enthusiasm, but there is no negative dissent among these reviews.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

James Whale's extravagantly produced sequel ranks as one of horrordom's greatest achievements, with wittily eccentric direction, Elsa Lanchester's electric hairdo, Ernest Thesiger's ingenious Dr Pretorius and Boris Karloff's poignant yet pushy monster. Some scenes, like the unveiling of the bride, are of emphatic classic status.

Read the full review →
Vulture
8 November 2025
95*

The critic ranks Bride of Frankenstein as the top Frankenstein film overall, highlighting its exciting and haunting take on the mythos with rich story, queer subtext, pathos, hysteria and a classic feast for the senses in its climactic scene.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Simon Braund
90*

The critic calls it one of the most beguiling American films ever made, outstripping the original Frankenstein in invention, visual splendour, humour, subversion and subtle characterisations. They single out the performances of Karloff, Lanchester and Thesiger, along with the art direction, cinematography and Whale's deft direction blending horror, satire and whimsy.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
3 January 1999 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert praises it as the best of the Frankenstein films, a sly subversive masterpiece of art direction that blends satire, excitement and humor while allowing the Monster more depth and speech.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
28 October 2024
90*

The critic ranks Bride of Frankenstein as the best in the Frankenstein series for being stranger, funnier and more beautiful than its predecessor, praising its oddball touches like the Mary Shelley framing device and the melancholy ending.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 May 1935
90*

The review calls it a first-rate horror film with excellent direction by Whale, strong performances especially from Karloff as the Monster, and effective settings, photography and makeup.

Read the full review →
Time Out
25 July 2012 · GA
90*

The critic calls it a tremendous sequel with a clever prologue, macabre humour and sense of parody. Strong on atmosphere, Gothic sets and expressionist camerawork, it is one of Whale's most perfectly realised movies and a delight from start to finish.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
21 October 1999 · Susan King
80*

King describes the film as one of the rare cases where the sequel is even better than the original, highlighting its entertaining blend of horror and humor along with strong documentary extras on the DVD.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
22 October 2010
70*

The piece presents the film as a wild ride that mixes classical and gutter elements with camp and serious tones. It highlights Karloff's returning monster with dialogue, Clive's hysterical doctor, Thesiger's flamboyant Pretorius, and Lanchester's iconic bride.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1934 · Variety Staff
70*

The review finds it a romp with Karloff investing the Monster with real emotion and touching moments, Thesiger diabolically effective as Pretorius, and Lanchester impressive in her dual roles, though more time could have been spent on the Bride.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
7 July 2016 · Tim George
90*

The film is an improvement over its predecessor in every respect, with a more complex story, more dynamic direction, and a colourful cast. Karloff’s Monster and Thesiger’s Pretorius stand out as highlights in one of the darkest, funniest, and most unique horror films ever made.

Read the full review →
Paste
8 August 2019 · Jim Vorel
90*

The critic calls Bride of Frankenstein one of the greatest horror sequels ever made and James Whale’s magnum opus, a more polished and ambitious film than the original with dynamic direction and iconic imagery.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
16 November 2025 · festival review · Jennie Kermode
85*

The critic highlights the film's exploration of clashing Gothic themes and praises Elsa Lanchester's stunning performance as the Bride for her nuanced gestures and agency. It commends the iconic costuming, production design, and score while noting the moral complexity and sympathetic portrayal of the creature.

Read the full review →
Film Stories
5 March 2024 · Sarah Cook
80*

The piece celebrates the sequel's deeper dive into morality and the creation of the Bride, singling out Elsa Lanchester's memorable performance and the film's iconic imagery and effects as reshaping horror cinema. It views both films as enduring classics with powerful contrasts between terror and humanity.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate