Critics’ reviews

Buddy (2026)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 61: 5 positive, 3 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Buddy

61
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
2

The reviews lean mildly positive on Buddy, with praise clustering around its recreation of cheerful children’s television and the nastiness beneath it. Critics repeatedly admire the retro production design, while Keegan-Michael Key’s voice performance draws particular approval. Several also find warmth beneath the gore: affection for the children gives the nostalgia more purpose than simply turning a familiar mascot murderous. The combination of absurd comedy and horror works for its supporters, though enthusiasm is far from uniform.

The main divide is over how long the premise remains funny or frightening. The Guardian finds a single joke stretched beyond its usefulness, whereas Collider argues that the film finishes before that joke wears thin. Elsewhere, reservations centre on uneven pacing, scattered satire and dramatic material that jars with the silliness. Even some favourable reviews question its thematic depth. The spread is wide, with the same premise producing both delighted approval and outright boredom.

The AV Club
24 August 2026 · B+ · Monica Castillo
83

Casper Kelly twists kids’ shows into a deranged horror delight that takes a killer Barney premise to its unhinged conclusion. The film peppers references to shows from several generations while perverting nostalgia for squeamish punchlines and poignant notes about growing up.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
28 August 2026 · Robert Abele
70*

The critic portrays the film as a curdled horror comedy that scrapes nostalgia from low-rent '90s kiddie programming, with strong retro design and a blend of dimensions and pop-culture references that keeps it weird and menacing to the end. A little of it goes a long way, much like the shows it spoofs.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
26 August 2026
70*

The premise sounds like a Family Guy cutaway gag but the film saves itself from tired edginess by actually having a heart beneath the blood-caked fur. It genuinely likes the kids and wants viewers to like them too as they discover the joys of things not allowed in a TV-Y series.

Read the full review →
Variety
24 January 2026 · festival review · Owen Gleiberman
60*

The review calls it a late-arriving fairy-tale satire of Barney with exquisite satirical world-building and inspired touches, but one that feels scattershot, with mild chuckles rather than big laughs and a conceptual joke that doesn't always sustain feature length. It's ultimately a surrealist hate letter made with love.

Read the full review →
Vulture
28 August 2026
60*

Buddy is the latest effort to find the scary side of nostalgia by recreating then dismantling the familiar upbeat tone of children’s programming. While it offers pleasures in its pitch-perfect re-creations of kiddie entertainment aesthetics, it is ultimately a testament to less being more.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 January 2026 · festival review
30*

The film is a one-joke comedy horror that fails to deliver either laughs or scares and would have worked better as a short. The central gimmick of a murderous children's TV mascot quickly wears thin, with the story unable to sustain interest over feature length or build meaningful stakes.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
24 August 2026 · Christian Zilko

Casper Kelly’s bloodthirsty riff on Barney is the first great midnight movie of 2026. The auteur makes full use of a worthy budget by playing his greatest hits on a multiplex-worthy scale.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
24 January 2026 · festival review

The critic finds the film an enjoyable horror-comedy that satirizes cheerful children's TV shows with gore and snark, turning a beloved unicorn character homicidal. It praises Keegan-Michael Key's performance as the evil unicorn and the witty tension between the show's benign surface and sinister events.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
24 January 2026 · festival review · David Rooney

The film offers a subversive twist on educational children’s television but is in need of sharper teeth overall. The standout is Keegan-Michael Key’s inspired voice work as the title character.

Read the full review →
Consequence
27 August 2026 · B+
83

The critic highlights the immersive recreation of a children's TV world, the well-constructed puzzle-box narrative that builds to an emotional payoff, and excellent production values and voice cast. They note that it excels as entertaining shock-value satire but falls short of deeper thematic resonance.

Read the full review →
Collider
24 January 2026 · 7/10 · Ross Bonaime
70

The critic praises the film's effective shifts between tones in its absurd horror-comedy premise, strong performances especially from Cristin Milioti and Delaney Quinn that add emotional depth, and clever world-building. They note that it gets in and out before the central joke wears thin while still leaving the viewer wanting more.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
26 January 2026 · ★★★ · Nathan McVay
60

The critic finds the film hilarious, unique, and wildly unpredictable as a true Sundance original, praising its surreal '90s nostalgia and strong cast performances, especially Keegan-Michael Key as Buddy. However, it stumbles with uneven pacing and an abrupt dramatic subplot that clashes with the absurd tone.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
23 January 2026 · festival review · Chase Hutchinson
25*

The review finds Casper Kelly’s feature debut a repetitive and baggy misfire that fails to expand successfully on the promise of his short “Too Many Cooks,” resulting in a boring stretch with little genuine inventiveness. It singles out the strong production design replicating children’s television aesthetics for praise while criticizing the juvenile jokes and lack of momentum after a promising start.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate