Critics’ reviews

Caché (2005)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 87: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Caché

87
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are consistently positive about Caché, with praise centred on Haneke’s control of images and his use of surveillance to make watching feel uncomfortable. Critics repeatedly connect the couple’s private unease to questions of denial, racism and France’s colonial history. The long, static shots and uncertain boundary between recorded footage and unfolding action draw particular attention: the suspense comes from questioning what is visible, rather than simply waiting for the mystery to be solved. Performances also receive praise for sustaining that unease.

There is little outright disagreement; the differences concern emphasis more than approval. Some critics concentrate on the political implications, others on guilt, family secrets and the audience’s complicity. Reservations are limited: The Skinny acknowledges frustrations and describes the film as demanding, while still recommending it. Across the reviews, the ambiguity is largely treated as a source of psychological pressure rather than a storytelling weakness.

Slant Magazine
8 October 2005 · ★★★★/4 · Joe McGovern
100

The critic praises Haneke's cunning modern allegory that interlaces bourgeois complacency, subconscious guilt, and the impossibility of truth in film, condemning First World racism through the story of surveillance tapes and repressed colonial history.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Paul Arthur
90*

Haneke’s latest provocation is a masterpiece of urban dread and an exceptionally acute inquiry into human behavior and guilt. The director’s control of image, point of view, and the film’s productive enigma stand out as sources of its dramatic and psychological power.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
19 December 2005
80*

The review highlights Haneke's thriller about a couple receiving surveillance tapes that unearth personal and national guilt, commending its tense voyeuristic structure and political allegory.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
23 December 2005 · Kevin Thomas

The critic calls the film a psychological suspense drama of utmost rigor and originality that confronts individual and collective responsibility for past evils, particularly France's treatment of Algeria, through mysterious videos that torment a successful Parisian couple. Haneke's taut, ambiguous storytelling and natural performances keep the focus on uncomfortable truths that linger beyond the final image.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
13 January 2010 · Roger Ebert

The critic describes the film as a thriller that coils tension inward rather than releasing it, focusing on a bourgeois Parisian couple tormented by surveillance videos and drawings that expose buried guilt from Georges's childhood. Haneke's precise camerawork and ambiguity shift attention from the mystery's solution to the psychological and historical consequences for the characters.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Catherine Wheatley

The critic examines Haneke's use of video surveillance and narrative tricks to explore guilt, denial, and complicity in personal and historical (colonial) contexts. She highlights the film's ability to unsettle viewers through simulation and its socio-political resonance beyond France.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
27 January 2006 · Peter Bradshaw

The critic calls Hidden Michael Haneke’s masterpiece and a compelling politico-psychological essay on denial and guilt in the foundations of western prosperity. He singles out the film’s forensic, dispassionate scrutiny of a bad dream and its implication of the viewer in the protagonist’s destructive gaze.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 December 2005 · A. O. Scott

The review portrays the film as a nerve-rackingly suspenseful exploration of voyeurism, paranoia, and bourgeois self-satisfaction, beginning with a surveillance video of a comfortable Parisian couple's home that disrupts their lives. Haneke implicates the audience in the act of watching while probing themes of guilt, complicity, and the fragility of security.

Read the full review →
Time Out
19 March 2012 · DC

The critic praises the film as an unsettling, self-reflective masterpiece that marries thriller elements with ideas about guilt, racism, French history, and cinema. They single out the clever video conceit and the performances of Auteuil and Binoche for creating pervasive unease and complicity in the audience.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
27 January 2006 · Anton Bitel
85*

The film is praised as a complex, non-conventional mystery that uses its voyeuristic structure to explore deep-seated personal and political guilt. It singles out the way the static, seemingly innocuous images implicate both the characters and the audience in acts of denial and complicity.

Read the full review →
Paste
23 March 2006 · Robert Davis
80*

Haneke’s multi-layered, open-ended thriller fascinates on every level as both a suspense film and a versatile metaphor for family secrets, buried trauma, and national guilt. The critic singles out the director’s visual trickery—slipping between live action and videotape, and holding uncomfortably long shots—as what makes the mystery gripping without needing resolution.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
17 March 2006 · ★★★★ · Paul Gallagher
80

Though demanding, Hidden rewards viewers with ample food for thought through its tense atmosphere and probing questions about families, moral responsibility, and French colonial history. The long takes, strong performances, and thought-provoking conclusion make it highly recommended despite its frustrations.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate