Most critics find this a tired entry, and the negative reviews outnumber the positive nearly four to one. The praise that does come clusters on Anthony Mackie, whose steady, grounded Sam Wilson is credited even in the harshest notices, and on Harrison Ford, who several reviews say is doing more acting than the material asks of him as President Ross. A handful also rate the fight scenes as sturdily staged, particularly in the first two-thirds.
The reservations cluster on the script: convoluted plotting, a heavy debt to earlier Marvel lore, stiff dialogue, and visuals described as drab or murky, with more than one review noting signs of reshoots. The spread is wide, running from 20 to 75. The Los Angeles Times is the most generous, reading it as a decent political thriller with something to say about Black heroism; RogerEbert.com and The Wrap argue the opposite, that it raises its political ideas and then declines to engage with them.
L
Los Angeles Times
13 February 2025 · Katie Walsh
75*
Despite being bogged down by heavy MCU exposition and lore, the film works as a decent political thriller with resonant themes of Black heroism and a strong central performance from Anthony Mackie. The clear cinematography, sturdy action sequences, and chemistry between Mackie and Danny Ramirez stand out as bright spots.
Read the full review →E
Empire
12 February 2025 · Helen O’Hara
70*
Mackie delivers a strong, focused lead performance in a coherent story that emphasises his compassion and relationships. It is pacy and promising overall but occasionally formulaic with stilted dialogue and inconsistent thriller elements.
Read the full review →V
Variety
12 February 2025 · Owen Gleiberman
70*
The film works well enough as a vigorous, prosaic adventure that balances shield-bashing action with elements of a gritty geopolitical thriller, escaping much of the recent superhero fatigue. Harrison Ford's performance as the unstable President Ross and the earthbound quality rooted in Mackie's performance are highlights in this competent MCU time filler.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
12 February 2025 · ★★★ · Bradley Russell
60
Mackie’s Captain America earns his place in an uneven thriller that ventures into unfamiliar territory with strong turns from him and Harrison Ford before falling back on familiar Marvel shortcomings.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
12 February 2025 · Jake Cole
50*
The film is a convoluted wannabe paranoid thriller that suffers from a disjointed narrative but excels in coherent action sequences and strong character work, particularly for Sam Wilson.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
13 February 2025 · ★★ · Patrick Cremona
40
The critic deems the film flat, insipid and cobbled together, with an underbaked narrative, bland dialogue, drab visuals and nondescript action. It lacks creative spirit despite efforts from Mackie and Ford.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
12 February 2025
40*
The critic notes the film struggles in the shadow of stronger predecessors, with conventional set pieces that pale in comparison and an unremarkable feel overall. Mackie’s gritty presence is a positive amid the lacklustre sequel.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
12 February 2025 · Phil de Semlyen
35*
The critic calls the film clunky, uninspired and workmanlike, criticising its reliance on obscure prior MCU lore, ugly green-screen action and forgettable plot. Mackie’s portrayal of an insecure hero is a highlight amid the minimal impression made overall.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
13 February 2025 · ★★☆☆☆ · Raphael Abraham
30*
Anthony Mackie’s first outing as Captain America is burdened by Marvel backstory and filler. Harrison Ford valiantly tries to do some actual acting amid the action set pieces and predictable Red Hulk payoff.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
15 February 2025
30*
The critic finds the film a dull medley of prior MCU elements with little spirit or spectacle. The plot is overly on-the-nose in its politics and the action sequences feel mundane and conventional.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
12 February 2025 · Peter Bradshaw
30*
The film is a tired and uninspired Marvel entry with moderate action and convoluted plotting. Ford brings gravitas as the president while Mackie is charismatic as Captain America.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
12 February 2025 · Frank Scheck
30*
The critic finds the film a lackluster Marvel entry with an uninspired storyline and direction that lets down Anthony Mackie, despite some strong elements like Harrison Ford's performance. The pacing drags and effects are underwhelming.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
12 February 2025
30*
There is a yawning emptiness at the heart of this thrill-free thriller that wastes Harrison Ford. Mackie and his sidekick follow an investigative trail without much ideological or narrative substance.
Read the full review →T
The Times
12 February 2025 · ★☆☆☆☆ · Kevin Maher
30*
The MCU has eaten itself into a bloated stupor in this enervating 35th instalment. Even Harrison Ford and Anthony Mackie cannot save the vacant characters and constipated plotting.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
12 February 2025 · Bilge Ebiri
30*
The review criticizes the film as a messy, tiresome, and shallow Marvel production that fails to explore its ideas deeply or deliver exciting action, turning the MCU into a 'slop machine.'
Read the full review →R
RogerEbert.com
12 February 2025 · Robert Daniels
20*
The film clumsily wraps distant political themes around misshapen action set pieces and fails to deliver narrative coherence or meaningful representation for its Black Captain America. The intermittently sturdy, well-crafted action sequences provide the only saving grace amid tedious plotting and an unearned ending.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
12 February 2025 · Pete Hammond
70*
The critic finds Anthony Mackie up to the physical and stylistic demands of the role as Sam Wilson takes over as Captain America, while Harrison Ford steals the show as President Thaddeus Ross in a complicated action turn. Director Julius Onah gives Mackie plenty of opportunity to shine in an extension of the TV series, though the film falls below the standards of prior entries like The Winter Soldier and is a game effort with room to grow.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
12 February 2025 · 3 out of 5 · Joe George
60*
The film has enough B-movie thrills to mostly overcome its clunky and uneven script, with a propulsive pace and impressive fight scenes in the first two-thirds that evoke cheap 1990s thrills. The final act slows down with unearned emotional beats and poor visuals, but the overall cheap quality works in its favor.
Read the full review →C
Collider
12 February 2025 · 4/10 · Aidan Kelley
40
The film is one of the weakest MCU entries, predictable with rudimentary action, stiff dialogue and technical issues from reshoots; it praises Harrison Ford and Carl Lumbly for injecting humanity into their roles.
Read the full review →N
NME
13 February 2025 · ★★ · James Mottram
40
This is a bland, functional Marvel movie that offers little excitement and is largely dull and disappointing, with murky footage and no emotional depth despite Mackie doing a decent job in the lead. A semi-decent role for Tim Blake Nelson and a couple of nice cameos provide minor highlights amid the disappointment.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
12 February 2025 · Susana Polo
40*
The film fails at both the political and personal levels and bats strongly below average as a Captain America movie; it singles out Tim Blake Nelson's performance as The Leader and one wing-suit action sequence for praise.
Read the full review →The critic calls the film a superficial, perfunctory sequel that stumbles into powerful symbolism but has nothing to say about its ideas of government mistreatment of people of color or an unstable president, using them only as excuses for pedestrian action sequences. It looks half-finished with flat direction, underwhelming effects, and a timid refusal to engage with its themes, ending in one of the worst post-credits teases.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate