Critics’ reviews

Captain America: Civil War (2016)

19 reviews from 19 publications. Critics’ score 78: 17 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Captain America: Civil War

78
Positive
17
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics come away pleased, and several call it the studio’s best film yet. The praise gathers around how many heroes and storylines the film juggles without losing its shape. The falling-out between Steve Rogers and Tony Stark, and Rogers’s loyalty to Bucky Barnes, are credited with giving the fighting real weight, with Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr singled out for carrying it. The airport battle is the sequence most often named as the high point, and the introductions of Tom Holland’s Spider-Man and Black Panther are widely welcomed.

The reservations are mostly small: several reviews find it overlong, Radio Times thinks the villain weaker than earlier Marvel antagonists, and Sight and Sound says the action grows repetitive. The sharper dissent concerns substance. The New Yorker treats the oversight debate as an excuse for spectacle, and Slant Magazine argues the enjoyable fights undercut the film’s own theme of collateral damage. The spread runs from five stars at The Telegraph to Slant’s dismissal, but the bulk sits firmly in approval.

The Telegraph
29 April 2016 · ★★★★★ · Robbie Collin
100

This is Marvel's peak, a film that invests deeply in its characters as a long-form drama and delivers emotional payoffs alongside spectacular action. It has pin-precise tone control and faith in its heroes, making for the ultimate superhero showdown.

Read the full review →
Empire
29 April 2016 · Dan Jolin
90*

The critic calls it the best Marvel Studios movie yet for its skillful juggling of multiple characters and their arcs while advancing the overall continuity. It singles out the emotional core of Steve Rogers and Bucky Barnes' friendship, along with the smart handling of the central conflict without a conventional supervillain.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
13 April 2016
90*

The review describes the film as a gargantuan, well-paced entertainment that balances spectacle with emotional resonance and character-driven storytelling. It highlights the confident juggling of multiple superheroes and the plot's legitimate stakes.

Read the full review →
Variety
13 April 2016 · Justin Chang
90*

This is the most mature and substantive Marvel Cinematic Universe film yet, with dramatic coherence, thematic unity, and inventive action that shows restraint. The sibling directors and writers demonstrate the benefits of continuity in the franchise.

Read the full review →
Total Film
13 April 2016 · Jordan Farley
85*

The critic describes it as the superhero slugfest the summer deserved and up there with the best of Marvel, praising the emotional stakes, inventive airport battle, and Tom Holland's Spider-Man stealing scenes. It highlights how the film explores the cost of the Avengers' actions meaningfully while delivering fun, character-driven action.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Michael Sragow
80*

The critic finds the film solid, engrossing, and inspired, delivering taut storytelling and legitimate drama rather than just setpieces. They single out the introduction of Black Panther and the strong ensemble performances, especially Downey and Evans, for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
30 April 2016 · ★★★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
80

The critic praises the thumping, well-choreographed action and strong performances from Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr. in the hero-vs-hero slugfest, while noting the villain feels weaker than prior MCU antagonists.

Read the full review →
Time Out
20 April 2016 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The review celebrates the film's joy, humor, and well-crafted character conflicts alongside spectacular action, calling it Marvel at their best. It singles out Tom Holland's Spider-Man introduction as one of the series' sweetest scenes.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
28 April 2016 · Kim Newman
70*

The critic finds the film prioritizes emotional depth in its central conflict over pure spectacle, making it superior to similar superhero showdowns like Batman v Superman through strong character work. Action sequences are effective but eventually repetitive.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
20 April 2016 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

The film delivers entertaining mayhem as Avengers split over government oversight, with engaging action and a twisty plot involving betrayal. It is a tasty but insubstantial snack that gets upstaged in places by its ensemble but remains fun overall.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
13 April 2016 · Sheri Linden
70*

The critic finds the film overlong but surprisingly light on its feet, delivering fan-thrilling goods with strong action sequences and character contrasts, especially between Steve Rogers and Tony Stark. It singles out the winning introductions of Black Panther and a new Spider-Man for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
6 May 2016 · A.O. Scott
70*

The film is a crowded but reasonably enjoyable Avengers installment that succeeds by not trying to transcend genre conventions. The airport battle stands out as the most entertaining sequence due to its relatively low stakes and inventive spectacle.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
9 May 2016 · Anthony Lane
60*

The movie reduces the Avengers to a group of enhanced individuals squabbling over UN oversight, leading to a team-vs-team fight that serves as an excuse for spectacle rather than genuine political depth. It features clever cameos but feels like a collection of trailers for future films.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
3 May 2016 · Jake Cole
30*

The review notes that the fun of the action scenes exacerbates the failure of the narrative to adequately contend with its own themes of collateral damage and oversight. It praises the set pieces and character-specific combat choreography but criticizes how the story devolves into hero preference fights and uses personal loss to motivate characters.

Read the full review →
Collider
4 May 2016 · A · Matt Goldberg
95

The critic praises the film as a tremendous feat that undermines its superheroes to humanize them, balancing personal conflicts with spectacular action, and notes both sides of the divide have merit.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
6 May 2016 · ★★★★½ · Don Kaye
90

The critic calls it one of the top MCU films, an epic yet intimate tale that juggles multiple storylines and character responsibilities successfully. They single out the careful introductions of Spider-Man and Black Panther, along with the emotional weight of the hero-vs-hero conflict, for praise.

Read the full review →
/Film
6 May 2016 · Ethan Anderton
90*

The critic calls it a sharp, astounding, action-packed summer blockbuster and the kind of superhero movie you've been waiting to see your whole life, praising the organized handling of a busy story and the best action sequence Marvel has ever created in the airport battle. The performances of Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr. are singled out as the heart of the film, along with the organic introduction of Black Panther.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
11 May 2016 · Alison Herman
80*

The review highlights how Civil War addresses superhero genre issues through its conflict, atones for previous MCU missteps with better character handling and levity, and positions Marvel as adaptable and nimble.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
13 April 2016 · Dave White
70*

The film is a satisfying sequel that moves the Avengers to battle each other in service of exploring superhero responsibility and accountability for collateral damage. It balances serious-minded action with character relationships and fun, centered on Evans' empathetic performance as Cap.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate