Critics’ reviews

Carrie (1976)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 83: 13 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Carrie

83
Positive
13
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics strongly favour Carrie, with praise centred on Sissy Spacek’s vulnerability, Piper Laurie’s disturbing presence and Brian De Palma’s control of tension. The reviews repeatedly find that the horror draws its force from recognisable adolescent fears: bullying, sexual anxiety and conflict between mother and daughter. De Palma’s elaborate staging and vivid imagery attract broad admiration, while several critics value the uneasy mixture of sadness, humour and cruelty.

The main reservation concerns how the film looks at its female characters: Time Out finds the male gaze exploitative, despite admiring the direction and Spacek’s performance, whereas Slant Magazine praises its feminine perspective and sensual style. The spread is otherwise concentrated at the positive end, with one sharply negative dissent. The New York Times finds the film generally overwrought and messy, allowing that it is occasionally touching and that Spacek provides its chief interest.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

De Palma's gothic fairy tale is praised as a tense and lyrical web of emotions with standout performances from Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie. The symbolic crucifixion scene and overall package of pop psychology and psychic phenomena are highlighted as thrilling highlights in an unforgettable film.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Andrew Collins
90*

The critic praises De Palma's directorial bravado in this masterwork, highlighting the unforgettable set-pieces like the shower scene, prom night, and dream ending, while noting its subtext on power, religion, and high school cruelty.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 1976 · Roger Ebert
90*

Ebert calls the film an absolutely spellbinding horror movie and an observant human portrait of a shy, complicated high-school senior with telekinetic powers. He praises the performances by Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie and notes how the horror grows organically out of the characters.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 August 2006 · Eric Henderson
90*

The critic calls Carrie De Palma’s first completely mature film and a profoundly sad horror comedy that synthesizes his destructive humor with graceful visuals. He singles out its insistently sensual style, feminine perspective, and bittersweet humor for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 October 2024 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic hails De Palma’s 1976 film as an insouciantly horrible masterpiece and a groundbreaking horror classic. They single out the staggering, drawn-out prom sequence for its evolving power and split-screen carnage.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
15 November 1976 · Pauline Kael
90*

Kael praises the film as a terrifyingly lyrical thriller with a teasing mix of comedy, horror, and tension, calling it a new trash archetype and a menstrual joke in the form of a film noir in red. She highlights De Palma's baroque sensibility, the archetypal Cinderella-revenge plot, and strong performances by Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie.

Read the full review →
The Times
17 October 2024 · ★★★★☆
90*

The critic calls the film a streamlined shocker that retains its unnerving power, praising the central pairing of Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie as the emotional spine. They note the disturbing clashes between mother and daughter.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
11 December 2017 · Anton Bitel
80*

The review highlights how adolescence and coming-of-age themes drive the horror in De Palma's adaptation of the Stephen King novel. It praises the film's exploration of empowerment, sexuality, and violence through its vivid red imagery and key sequences like the shower scene and prom climax.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
3 November 2016 · Mark Butler
80*

The critic highlights how the film captures the terror of high school bullying and social anxiety through its iconic scenes, praising the direction and performances for reflecting everyday adolescent fears.

Read the full review →
Time Out
26 May 2022 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The critic finds the film troubling in a modern context for its exploitative male gaze on female characters and bodies. De Palma's assured direction and Sissy Spacek's flawless performance are singled out for praise as making it a gripping horror with effective set pieces.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 November 1976 · Vincent Canby
30*

Canby describes the film as an elegant but messy box lunch that is sometimes funny, generally overwrought, and occasionally touching. He singles out Sissy Spacek's effective, if over-the-top, performance as the main source of interest amid the horror and prom-night chaos.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 April 2025 · festival review · Antoni Konieczny
90*

There is practically no fault in Brian De Palma’s landmark adaptation of Stephen King’s novel, a defining work of New Horror that showcases the expressive potential of cinema. The critic singles out the film’s visual eclecticism, swirling camera work, irreverent score, gothic art direction, and kaleidoscopic cinematography for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Paste
18 September 2019 · Jim Vorel
90*

The critic calls Carrie the best horror film of 1976 and praises its fidelity to the source material in the New Hollywood era. They single out Sissy Spacek's genuinely vulnerable and unstable performance as the key element that later versions fail to recapture.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
12 August 2019 · Rebecca Lea
80*

The critic calls De Palma’s film a solid adaptation of King’s novel that captures its disquieting mood and focuses on Carrie’s personal tragedy. They praise Sissy Spacek’s performance for balancing naivety and steeliness while noting the film’s potent, layered quality as a horror classic.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate