Critics’ reviews

Casablanca (1943)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 84: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Casablanca

84
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics warmly endorse Casablanca, with praise clustering around its combination of romance, wartime suspense and sharp dialogue. Bogart and Bergman draw much of the attention, while Claude Rains and the supporting cast receive substantial credit. The reviews also praise Michael Curtiz’s direction for keeping the crowded drama moving, alongside the cinematography and music. Several accounts see its lasting appeal in how successfully these elements work together, rather than in the love story alone.

The differences concern emphasis as much as quality. Little White Lies foregrounds the refugees and anti-fascist politics, treating resistance to tyranny as central to the film’s appeal. Reservations elsewhere concern plot plausibility and the degree of enthusiasm it deserves: The Guardian admires the performances and momentum but questions the plotting. The New Yorker is the notably cooler voice, finding it tolerable rather than exceptional, while still crediting the screenplay and the use of ‘As Time Goes By’.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Andrew Collins
100

The critic calls it a timeless love story wrapped in a gripping wartime thriller whose witty, meaningful script keeps it quotable decades later. He highlights Bogart's career-best performance as Rick alongside Bergman's luminous Ilsa, strong support from Rains and others, Steiner's score, and Curtiz's verve in assembling the elements into an emotional classic.

Read the full review →
Empire
2 February 2012 · Angie Errigo
95*

Everything in the film's magical, melodramatic mix of patriotic wartime sentiments, desperate refugees and star-crossed lovers works beautifully every time. It is the most enjoyable rewatchable picture ever made, a perfect blend of tight script, stylish cinematography and iconic performances.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
28 November 2022 · Tom Joudrey
85*

The piece praises Casablanca's enduring anti-isolationist and anti-fascist message as especially relevant today, viewing its refugee-focused plot and patriotic elements as a counter to America First politics rather than just a romance. It singles out the transnational cast of immigrants and the stirring 'La Marseillaise' scene for embodying resistance to tyranny.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
80*

The film came out rather well despite a constantly rewritten script and a director who nearly gave up. Its lasting appeal stems from the Hollywood studio system's ability to craft something memorable from almost nothing.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
15 January 1943
75*

The critic calls it a long and lively film bulging with acting talent and breathless with dramatic momentum. The film is expertly directed by Michael Curtiz, with standout performances from Claude Rains and Ingrid Bergman, though the climax depends on a gross improbability.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
28 November 1942 · David Lardner
60*

The critic finds the film pretty tolerable, though not quite up to Bogart’s previous spy outing “Across the Pacific.” He notes the eternal truths in the screenplay and the effective use of the sentimental tune “As Time Goes By.”

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
26 November 1942 · THR Staff

The critic calls it a terrific hit with inspired casting and direction that lifts audiences out of their seats. They single out the exceptional cast, Michael Curtiz's skilled direction, and strong technical achievements for praise.

Read the full review →
Collider
26 November 2022 · A · Remus Noronha
95

The critic calls it Hollywood's Golden Age at its very best and an enduring classic that has only grown in reputation over the decades. They single out the perfect blend of romance, drama, and wartime context with strong performances from Bogart and Bergman.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate