Critics’ reviews

Cast Away (2000)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 72: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Cast Away

72
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Cast Away, with praise centred on Tom Hanks’ physical performance and the sustained attention to the practical work of survival. The island sequences are widely judged absorbing, making isolation, improvisation and loneliness compelling with little need for dialogue. Robert Zemeckis’ visual storytelling, the staging of the plane crash and the detailed production design also earn approval, even from reviews less persuaded by the film’s larger ideas.

The reservations concern heavy symbolism, uneven momentum and a tendency towards sentimentality outside the central survival story. The spread is wider than the broadly positive consensus suggests: Time Out finds the solemn tone wearing, while The Guardian objects to the commercial branding and lack of psychological curiosity. The Telegraph goes further, rejecting Hanks’ credibility as a survivor and finding little dramatic subtlety; most other reviews regard his performance as the film’s chief strength.

The New Yorker
11 December 2000 · David Denby
85*

The critic highlights the film's startling physicality and mesmerizing depiction of suffering, improvisation, and survival, focusing on the detailed airplane crash and Hanks' bodily performance. It is described as an old-fashioned adventure epic rather than a triumph of the human spirit.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 December 2000
80*

Zemeckis delivers an intriguing survival and redemption saga that should be a huge box-office hit and earn Oscar nominations; it is more mature than his prior work but still features simplistic symbolism, with Hanks giving an awesome everyman performance.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
7 December 2000 · Keith Phipps
80*

Zemeckis' film is gripping and thoughtful, with Hanks delivering a strong performance that turns his everyman character into something more universal. The director's visual sense and the film's focus on time, isolation, and survival are highlighted as strengths.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 December 2000
80*

The critic commends the bold risks taken by Zemeckis and Hanks in this unique stranded-on-an-island story, praising Hanks' bravura performance and the meticulous production design. Some stretches lack dramatic momentum and veer into the overly metaphysical.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 December 2000 · Kenneth Turan
70*

The critic notes the film's top-notch filmmaking and visuals but finds it more of a straightforward survivor tale than the philosophical work intended, with the high-minded ideas only sporadically realized. The production details and Hanks' commitment are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
30 May 2012 · GA
40*

The critic finds Hanks' performance solid enough to carry much of the film alone and praises the well-staged crash, but faults the overly serious tone and heavy symbolism that make the story drag on too long.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas

The film delivers a powerful, absorbing depiction of a man marooned on a desert island, with expertly sustained wordless moviemaking and strong performances elevating familiar survival tropes. It falters somewhat on the emotional payoff after the protagonist's return to civilization.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 January 2001 · Peter Bradshaw

The film is a two-hour-plus advertisement for FedEx with no interest in the personal or social implications of being marooned. It is deeply silly, with Hanks emerging unchanged and robust rather than traumatised.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
8 December 2000 · Kirk Honeycutt

The film is an intermittently successful survival tale that fails to fully deliver on its themes of what is truly important in life. Hanks' performance and Zemeckis' visuals are praised, but the emotional undercurrents after the return to civilization are underexplored.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 December 2000 · NYT Critic’s Pick · Stephen Holden

The critic praises the film's gripping central section depicting survival and isolation on a desert island, highlighting Hanks' performance and the evocation of loneliness and human insignificance. The bookend narrative is seen as more formulaic and corny.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
· Andrew O'Hagan

Hanks is hardly credible as a survivor and the movie itself is beyond belief, with no human or dramatic subtlety. It is tabloid cinema obsessed with media frenzy rather than genuine drama or character.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
24 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
70*

The critic praises the film's focus on survival and Tom Hanks' performance in keeping the audience engaged during the long island sequence, but finds the post-rescue section overly sentimental.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate