Critics’ reviews

Catwoman (2004)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 34: 2 positive, 1 mixed, 11 negative.

Back to our review of Catwoman

34
Positive
2
Mixed
1
Negative
11

Most critics find Catwoman a poor superhero film, with eleven of the fourteen reviews negative. The complaints centre on a clunky, illogical script, thin characters and digital action that offers little excitement or feline grace. Halle Berry attracts the most consistent praise, with several critics finding charm and screen presence in a role that gives her little substance. Even some hostile reviews allow for moments of silliness or visual interest, though few find enough to sustain the film.

The sharpest division concerns Pitof’s flashy direction and the film’s camp humour. The Los Angeles Times finds the style sophisticated and the pace brisk, while The Hollywood Reporter enjoys the kitsch despite reservations about the script and effects. These are distinct minority positions in a wide spread of verdicts. Most critics find the visuals exhausting or artificial, while Berry’s performance also divides opinion: The AV Club finds her unconvincing.

Los Angeles Times
23 July 2004 · Kevin Thomas
75*

The critic finds the film swift, light on its feet, and stylish, with technical razzle-dazzle that never overshadows Halle Berry's fun, dual-personality performance as the mousy office worker turned glamorous superhuman. He singles out Pitof's sophisticated take on comic-book camp and romanticism for praise.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
23 July 2004 · Kirk Honeycutt
70*

The critic finds the film campy fun rather than a total disaster, praising Berry's appealing performance in a kitschy role while criticizing the illogical script and overreliance on digital effects.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 July 2004 · A. O. Scott
50*

The critic describes the film as a howlingly silly but moderately diverting exercise in high, pointless style that achieves the unlikely feat of making one prefer Bill Murray over Halle Berry in a cat role. He singles out its sleek, hissing, whip-cracking aesthetic and Berry's performance for note while dismissing the plot.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Derek Malcolm
40*

The film is not very good, with a clunky screenplay and special effects that make Spider-Man II look classic, but Halle Berry is the one redeeming feature as a beautiful dominatrix. The director's flashy style soon palls and the vulgarity is remorseless.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
23 July 2004
40*

The flashy but uninvolving Batman spin-off features uneven performances and a clunky script that fails to develop its themes. Pitof's stylised visuals dominate, but the film lacks the darker edge and moral ambiguity associated with the character.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 August 2004 · Peter Bradshaw
40*

The film is a broad action-comedy that fails to deliver on its promise of a saucer of cream, offering only semi-skimmed UHT instead; it features some alluring silliness around the heroine's cat-like powers but lacks real claws in its cat-fight and overall execution.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Roberto Sadovski
30*

The film is a formulaic and silly wannabe blockbuster with shallow characters, dull plastic action scenes and a logic-starved plot about a cosmetics conspiracy. Berry's screen presence cannot save the unintentional laughs.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · NB
30*

The film awkwardly mixes diluted feminism with teen blockbuster elements, resulting in a misguided address to career women. Its visual style and effects are chaotic and plastic, with Halle Berry's performance offering only fleeting promise amid broader aesthetic failures.

Read the full review →
Variety
22 July 2004 · David Rooney
25*

The critic calls the film a mangy misfire and dim popcorn inanity that lacks any real sense of fun, with a diluted script and frenetic music-video aesthetic that fails to deliver thrills or emotional payoff. He singles out the over-designed universe and poorly fleshed-out characters for complaint while noting the arresting opening titles.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 July 2004 · Roger Ebert
20*

The critic calls the film a dismal letdown that focuses almost entirely on Halle Berry's looks and costume while neglecting character, story, and action sequences, making it tired and dated compared to better summer fare. He singles out the lack of any meaningful exploration of what it feels like to become a catwoman for complaint.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 July 2004 · Ed Gonzalez
20*

The critic faults the film for exoticizing rather than deepening its heroine, an identity crisis in its visuals and soundtrack, and an overall confused, inhuman aesthetic.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
11 October 2007 · F · Nathan Rabin
15

The critic deems the film a complete failure that fails to learn from prior misfires like Batman & Robin, mocking its excessive camp, poor comedy, and Berry's performance as unconvincing.

Read the full review →
The Times
14 August 2004 · Dominic Wells
10*

This is the stupidest and most incompetent superhero movie in years, with lifeless plots, direction towards the exit, and CGI that fails to convey feline grace; it is particularly damning next to superior films like Spider-Man 2.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 August 2004 · David Haviland
10*

The critic declares it the worst Hollywood film of the year so far, with almost no creative ideas and poor execution across the board. The story is nonexistent, focusing excessively on origins and Berry's appearance rather than substance or stakes.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate