Film review

Catwoman

2004 · Directed by Pitof · 1h 44m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceHalle Berry gets superpowers; the camera would still rather inspect her wardrobe

ActionFantasyCrime

Patience Phillips (Halle Berry) is a timid office worker who acquires cat-like powers and begins a second life as Catwoman. Her transformation brings a new confidence, but also danger as a cosmetics conspiracy takes shape. Around her are Tom Lone (Benjamin Bratt), Laurel Hedare (Sharon Stone) and George Hedare (Lambert Wilson). Patience has to make sense of the change while negotiating the competing demands of her ordinary life and her new abilities. Romance and crime complicate an identity she is only beginning to understand.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Halle Berry brings some warmth to Catwoman, but this is a poor superhero film. Pitof’s restless direction makes the digital action tiring, and the script gives its heroine little to do with her new confidence.

Pitof’s Catwoman wants to turn a timid woman’s discovery of power into a playful mixture of romance, fantasy and action. It has a willing lead in Halle Berry, and there is nothing inherently unpromising about placing this transformation inside a cosmetics conspiracy. But this is a poor superhero film, with too little interest in the woman undergoing the change. The effort goes into making her look striking, then making everything around her move.

Halle Berry gives Patience Phillips a vulnerability that makes the early timidity bearable, then finds some pleasure in Catwoman’s greater assurance. We can see why some critics have enjoyed her performance: she is prepared to play the silliness without apologising for it. The difficulty is how little she gets to explore between these extremes. Acquiring powers ought to change how Patience Phillips thinks and chooses, but the film is much more attentive to how she presents herself.

Thierry Arbogast’s photography supplies the slick finish that this approach requires, although the relentless emphasis on style soon becomes tiring. Sylvie Landra’s editing gives the action little chance to establish a clear physical rhythm, and the digital effects make movement look plastic. We were bored by the action because we could not feel the weight or danger of what the bodies were doing. For a heroine whose appeal depends partly on feline grace, that is a substantial failure.

Bill Brzeski’s production design pushes the artificiality further; the surroundings feel so fussed over that they become distracting. There is some pleasure in the excess, and Angus Strathie’s costume design gives the heroine a silhouette we can recognise at once. Yet the attention paid to her outfit makes the thinness of her character harder to overlook. Klaus Badelt’s music adds to the busy presentation without giving it much shape, so the soundtrack offers little help in deciding when to relax and when to expect danger.

The screenplay credited to John Rogers has a workable subject in the cosmetics business, where anxiety about appearance is already part of the transaction. It does little with that opportunity beyond furnishing a criminal plot. Sharon Stone’s Laurel Hedare can accommodate the exaggerated tone, but Benjamin Bratt’s Tom Lone and Lambert Wilson’s George Hedare remain difficult to care about. The characters need motives with some force behind them; the plot’s strained logic makes their behaviour feel arranged to keep things going.

A superhero film can be ridiculous and still persuade us to worry about somebody getting hurt. For camp to be funny, the actors need time to let us enjoy their absurdity, and Pitof keeps interrupting them with another burst of visual activity. The romance and comedy might have provided some breathing space, but they are too weakly developed to do the work. At 104 minutes, the film feels longer than its story can support.

Halle Berry’s willingness to commit is the reason to stay, should curiosity get the better of judgement. There are brief glimpses of the lighter, more amusing film her performance might have carried, and we would not dismiss the effort she puts into them. Come for her if necessary; do not expect the action to compensate when the writing fails.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

34
Positive
2
Mixed
1
Negative
11

Most critics find Catwoman a poor superhero film, with eleven of the fourteen reviews negative. The complaints centre on a clunky, illogical script, thin characters and digital action that offers little excitement or feline grace. Halle Berry attracts the most consistent praise, with several critics finding charm and screen presence in a role that gives her little substance. Even some hostile reviews allow for moments of silliness or visual interest, though few find enough to sustain the film.

The sharpest division concerns Pitof’s flashy direction and the film’s camp humour. The Los Angeles Times finds the style sophisticated and the pace brisk, while The Hollywood Reporter enjoys the kitsch despite reservations about the script and effects. These are distinct minority positions in a wide spread of verdicts. Most critics find the visuals exhausting or artificial, while Berry’s performance also divides opinion: The AV Club finds her unconvincing.

Los Angeles Times
23 July 2004 · Kevin Thomas
75*

The critic finds the film swift, light on its feet, and stylish, with technical razzle-dazzle that never overshadows Halle Berry's fun, dual-personality performance as the mousy office worker turned glamorous superhuman. He singles out Pitof's sophisticated take on comic-book camp and romanticism for praise.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
23 July 2004 · Kirk Honeycutt
70*

The critic finds the film campy fun rather than a total disaster, praising Berry's appealing performance in a kitschy role while criticizing the illogical script and overreliance on digital effects.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 July 2004 · A. O. Scott
50*

The critic describes the film as a howlingly silly but moderately diverting exercise in high, pointless style that achieves the unlikely feat of making one prefer Bill Murray over Halle Berry in a cat role. He singles out its sleek, hissing, whip-cracking aesthetic and Berry's performance for note while dismissing the plot.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Derek Malcolm
40*

The film is not very good, with a clunky screenplay and special effects that make Spider-Man II look classic, but Halle Berry is the one redeeming feature as a beautiful dominatrix. The director's flashy style soon palls and the vulgarity is remorseless.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
23 July 2004
40*

The flashy but uninvolving Batman spin-off features uneven performances and a clunky script that fails to develop its themes. Pitof's stylised visuals dominate, but the film lacks the darker edge and moral ambiguity associated with the character.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
6 August 2004 · Peter Bradshaw
40*

The film is a broad action-comedy that fails to deliver on its promise of a saucer of cream, offering only semi-skimmed UHT instead; it features some alluring silliness around the heroine's cat-like powers but lacks real claws in its cat-fight and overall execution.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

BET Award for Best Actor & Actress, 2005

Nominated
BET Award for Best Actor & Actress

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress, 2004

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director, 2004

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture, 2004

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple/Ensemble, 2004

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple/Ensemble

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay, 2004

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screenplay

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award, 2004

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress, 2004

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress

If you liked this, try…

Batman Returns poster81

Batman Returns

1992 · Another Catwoman, with room for anger, desire and a personality beyond the costume.

The Mask poster

The Mask

1994 · A timid lead discovers impossible powers, and the physical comedy does the explaining.

The Heroic Trio poster

The Heroic Trio

1993 · Three heroines, extravagant costumes and action with a much firmer sense of fun.

Daisies poster

Daisies

1966 · Female rebellion played for disruptive comedy, with far less concern for good behaviour.

A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night poster

A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night

2014 · A dangerous nocturnal heroine whose stillness makes the threat feel worth taking seriously.