Critics’ reviews

Cleopatra (1963)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 62: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Cleopatra

62
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
3

Most critics lean warm, and the praise clusters in one place: the spectacle. Cleopatra’s entry into Rome comes up repeatedly, as do the sea battle at Actium and the barge, and several reviewers credit the thousands of real extras and the scale of the sets with a sense of the ancient world that studios no longer attempt. Elizabeth Taylor is the other point of agreement; even reviewers cool on the film grant that her presence carries it, and the earliest notices credit Mankiewicz’s script with unusual literacy for a costume epic.

The reservations gather around the drama beneath the pageantry. Several find the screenplay wordy and the story rambling, and Empire argues that Taylor and Burton never convince as lovers. The spread is wide, from outright admiration to Slant Magazine’s view that it is neither a triumph nor an interesting disaster but simply dull. The New Yorker splits the difference, finding the dialogue absurd and recommending it anyway for the look of the thing.

The Guardian
11 July 2013 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The restored big-screen version of the four-hour 1963 spectacle should not be missed as a colossus of the analogue-epic era and the high point of Elizabeth Taylor's global celebrity. It is a stately but sometimes mindboggling spectacle that breaks into two halves as Cleopatra bewitches and unmans two Roman alpha-males, with the jawdropping entry into Rome singled out as a sensational Busby Berkeley fantasy.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 June 1963
90*

The critic calls the film a stunning and entertaining achievement that confounds skeptics, crediting Mankiewicz's sophisticated script for bringing literate life and historical sweep to the epic tale of ambition, love, and power. The production delivers spectacle in the finest tradition despite its length.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
13 June 1963 · James Powers
70*

The critic finds it not a great movie but a vast popular entertainment with outstanding performances, especially Elizabeth Taylor's, and spectacular production values. Praises the opulence and acting while noting it prioritizes broad appeal over artistic greatness.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1963
70*

The review praises the film as a supercolossal yet remarkably literate recreation of history, highlighting Mankiewicz's achievement in managing scope and complexity, strong big scenes like the Roman entry and Battle of Actium, and overall sense of time and place despite weaker love scenes.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
12 July 2013 · Derek Malcolm
60*

The film is no masterpiece but its lavish splendour compensates for a wordy screenplay and uneven acting; it became one of the biggest commercial successes despite its troubled production.

Read the full review →
Time Out
8 July 2013 · ★★★ · Trevor Johnston
60

The critic finds the film lacks much substance as drama but excels as unmatched Hollywood spectacle thanks to its thousands of real extras and recreation of the ancient world. Elizabeth Taylor's larger-than-life star presence is singled out for praise amid complaints of a rambling, purposeless narrative.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
40*

The film lacks human drama amid its giant sets and elaborate stars, with Mankiewicz opting for splendour over action; Taylor and Burton fail to convey a torrid affair.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
15 June 1963 · Brendan Gill
40*

The review deems the film preposterous due to its false, overblown dialogue and pseudo-literary tone but recommends seeing it anyway for the thrilling visual spectacle, including Cleopatra's barge and Roman pageantry, which outweigh the flaws.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
24 May 2013 · Chuck Bowen
30*

The critic calls the film disappointingly banal rather than a masterpiece or fascinating catastrophe, an unusually intimate epic that falls very flat as a kitschy fashion show centered on Taylor's celebrity. Singles out the ravishing visuals and decadent presentation for praise in the Blu-ray edition.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 April 2013 · Jennie Kermode
75*

The critic praises Elizabeth Taylor's powerful embodiment of the historical figure and the film's intelligent interweaving of personal and political elements, along with its striking visual contrast between decadent Egypt and austere Rome. Story issues, meandering pace, and historical inaccuracies are noted, but the strong characters and glamour make it engaging and enduring.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate