Critics’ reviews

Dances with Wolves (1990)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 62: 4 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Dances with Wolves

62
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics respond warmly to Dances with Wolves, praising the sweep of Kevin Costner’s direction and the attention given to Sioux characters and daily life. The landscape photography attracts approval even from detractors, while favourable reviews also single out the natural performances, humour and John Barry’s score. For its supporters, the film’s length allows its encounters and relationships to develop at an engaging pace.

The disagreement is substantial, particularly over whether that sympathetic approach offers insight or sentimental simplification. Time Out admires the film’s cultural detail but finds the final half-hour faltering. The New Yorker takes a much harsher view, arguing that its portrayal of both Sioux and white characters is simplistic and its storytelling lacks force. Slant Magazine likewise admires the landscapes but finds little thematic weight or emotional resonance. Sentimentality troubles some admirers too; the sharpest divide concerns how much substance lies beneath the handsome presentation.

Empire
· Angie Errigo
85*

Costner's directorial debut is a personal and artistic triumph and a box-office winner. It is an evocative, hugely enjoyable epic with unprecedented affection for Native Americans, though overly sentimental in places.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
75*

The critic finds Costner's directorial debut a genuinely impressive epic Western with sincere sentiments and huge dramatic sweep. They single out the historical and cultural authenticity as an end in itself, while noting it looks great despite some sentimentalisation and a faltering final half-hour.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
10 December 1990 · Pauline Kael
30*

The critic views the film as a naive, middle-of-the-road New Age social-studies lesson that simplifies the Sioux as genial versions of whites and depicts white men as foul louts. It lacks narrative power or bite, coming across as childishly innocent and lightweight despite its vastness.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
7 June 2003 · ★/4 · Nick Schager
25

The critic calls the film a proficient but overrated epic that remains a well-polished but generic example of Hollywood filmmaking 13 years later. They single out its majestic landscape cinematography for praise while faulting its lack of thematic weight or emotional resonance.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
9 November 1990 · Sheila Benson

The critic praises Costner's directorial debut as a stirringly fine frontier epic rich in character, action, and spectacle, with a clear-eyed vision that feels authentic and lyrical. She singles out the extraordinary buffalo hunt and the film's engaging focus on Sioux characters and humor.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 November 1990 · Vincent Canby

The critic finds Costner's directorial debut a competent and ambitious frontier epic with the makings of a great work, recalling literary antecedents like Robinson Crusoe. It stands out for its natural performances, vast scope, and portrayal of a soldier's integration with the Sioux.

Read the full review →
Variety
11 November 1990 · Amy Dawes

The critic commends Costner's directorial debut for its rare grace and feeling in an elegiac tale of discovery among the Sioux, with fresh and assured direction that makes the three-hour length engaging. She highlights the natural grandeur of the plains, John Barry's score, and strong Native American performances.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
25 November 2004 · Angus Wolfe Murray
90*

The critic praises Kevin Costner's achievement in making a three-hour subtitled Western that breaks Hollywood rules and revives the genre with integrity and conviction. They single out the film's natural depiction of Dunbar's integration into Sioux life and Costner's modest performance for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
10 November 2009 · ★★★★ · Simon Brew
80

The critic calls it a bold, ambitious first directorial effort that really works despite going against Hollywood trends, praising the photography, landscapes, and supporting cast while wishing for less narration.

Read the full review →
Collider
2 February 2011 · Andre Dellamorte
60*

The critic views the film as working primarily as a travelogue rather than offering deep insight, finding it safe and not a masterpiece but better than its over-hated reputation suggests, with praise for its nature photography and John Barry's score.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate