Critics’ reviews

Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father (2008)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 81: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father

81
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are consistently positive about Dear Zachary, with praise centred on its emotional force and the intimacy of Kurt Kuenne’s portrait of his friend. Critics repeatedly single out the editing: home footage, photographs and frank interviews bring the subject and his loved ones close, while giving the documentary an urgent pace. Its combination of personal memorial and anger at the Canadian justice system is widely seen as affecting, even when its methods are forceful.

The reservations concern how hard the film pushes for a response. The Guardian questions its manipulative tone and some footage choices; Variety is similarly troubled by the polemical approach, while admiring the editing. Time Out finds some cinematic roughness but values the immediacy. The spread is fairly narrow: these are disagreements about restraint and polish within a positive consensus, rather than doubts about the story’s power.

Slant Magazine
26 February 2009 · Rob Humanick
90*

Kuenne’s film breathlessly stares down the spiraling abyss of tragedy and miraculously finds the light at the end of the tunnel. It singles out the virtuoso, artful evocation through layered montages of home movies, photos, and interviews that assault the viewer with raw emotion.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 October 2008 · Stephen Holden
90*

The critic finds it impossible not to be fired up by this incendiary personal documentary and polemical rant against the Canadian justice system. It honors the murdered friend's memory while provoking outrage over the handling of his unstable ex-girlfriend.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 November 2008 · Robert Abele
80*

The film is an undeniably shattering story of grief, outrage, love and confusion. It has a scorched-earth policy when it comes to stirring up feelings, though it is forgivably shaky in its impassioned unfolding.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
29 October 2008 · The Associated Press
80*

The film is an anguished cry fueled by love and rage that turns into a riveting crime thriller and indictment of the Canadian justice system. It singles out the deftly orchestrated portrait of Bagby and his parents' activism in the face of tragedy.

Read the full review →
Time Out
28 October 2008 · Mark Holcomb
80*

The film is an agile, dizzyingly thorough tear-wringer that blends memorial, crime drama and legal-reform elements, surpassing Capturing the Friedmans as one of the most searingly personal documentaries of its era. Kuenne's skillful editing of personal footage and emotionally frank interviews with the subject's loved ones create immediacy despite some lack of cinematic sophistication.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 February 2010 · Tim Dowling
75*

The review describes the film's powerful and stunning impact on the viewer after it shifts from a memorial to a harrowing account of murder, custody battles and tragedy. It notes some discomfort with the film's manipulative tone and questionable footage choices while acknowledging its undeniable force.

Read the full review →
Variety
25 January 2008 · festival review · Peter Debruge
70*

What begins as a poignant tribute snowballs into a gut-wrenching true-crime story and shamelessly manipulative polemic. It is above all a virtuoso feat in editing that leaves audiences emotionally exhausted.

Read the full review →
Collider
30 October 2008 · A minus · Brian Orndorf

The film is an outstanding, monumentally emotional documentary that presents grief with poetic candor and will knock viewers flat with its range of emotions. It singles out the stirring portrait of Andrew constructed from home movies and photos, along with the overwhelming love flowing through the narrative, while noting some overly chaotic editing and missing psychological insight into the killer.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate