Critics’ reviews

Death to 2020 (2020)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 52: 3 positive, 3 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Death to 2020

52
Positive
3
Mixed
3
Negative
4

The reviews split evenly, with a slight lean against. Most critics agree the cast is the reason to watch: Lisa Kudrow, Cristin Milioti and Diane Morgan are singled out repeatedly, even by writers who dislike the rest, and Samuel L. Jackson and Leslie Jones are credited as its voices of sanity. The kinder notices call it a sharp, cathartic send-off to a wretched year, with the election-night coverage and Charlie Brooker’s short, cutting descriptions of public figures drawing the warmest words.

The reservations cluster on the writing. Several critics find the satire broad and familiar, a recap of a year too painful to be funny yet, and the Evening Standard says it is weaker than Brooker’s Screenwipe and that seventy minutes is too long. The spread is wide: NME finds it hilarious and cohesive, while The Hollywood Reporter and Vulture call it hacky and limp, a special that feels as long as the year it describes.

Los Angeles Times
31 December 2020 · Lorraine Ali
75*

Ali finds the mockumentary a bitingly funny, cathartic send-off to a terrible year. She singles out the cast’s inspired performances and the sharp satire of the election-night coverage.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
27 December 2020 · B- · Zack Handlen
70

Handlen finds the special largely unnecessary, though it offers a mildly cathartic recap of a chaotic year. He praises Samuel L. Jackson’s role as a steady voice of sanity and notes that a few character bits build effectively into absurdity.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 December 2020
64*

The article appears to review the 2020 special, but its verdict and specific praise or criticism are not available in the supplied page text. The page returned only a JavaScript and ad-blocker message.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
62*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint can be reliably identified.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
14 January 2021
45*

The critic finds the satire intermittently effective but too familiar and blunted by its broad, predictable approach. Cristin Milioti’s performance as a bigoted conspiracy theorist is singled out as especially compelling.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
27 December 2020 · D+ · Ryan Lattanzio
43

Lattanzio finds the special profoundly unfunny and an ill-judged recap of a year too painful to revisit. He singles out the tired stereotypes and jokes, while noting that Leslie Jones provides the most sensible center.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
27 December 2020 · ★★ · Nancy Durrant
40

Durrant finds the satire weaker than Screenwipe and says its 70-minute runtime outstays its welcome. She praises Lisa Kudrow’s chilling performance and the script’s inspired incidental jokes.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
27 December 2020 · Daniel Fienberg
20*

Fienberg finds the special hacky, unfunny, and lacking a distinctive angle, making it feel as interminable as the year it recaps. He praises Diane Morgan’s performance as Gemma Nerrick as a clear highlight with a specific voice and perspective.

Read the full review →
Vulture
28 December 2020 · Kathryn VanArendonk
20*

The critic finds the special a limp, unimaginative recap that fails to make its political comedy fresh. Lisa Kudrow’s pitch-perfect performance is singled out as a highlight, though the script gives her little to work with.

Read the full review →
NME
88*

The review finds the mockumentary hilarious and cohesive, calling it a sharp comic account of a chaotic year. It especially praises Brooker’s concise, cutting descriptions of public figures and the show’s satire of documentary conventions.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate