Critics’ reviews

Dial M for Murder (1954)

9 reviews from 9 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 5 so far.

Back to our review of Dial M for Murder

5 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
0

With only 5 reviews in so far, most critics find Hitchcock’s thriller suspenseful despite its theatrical confines. Praise centres on the tightly worked plot, his handling of intimate exchanges and Ray Milland’s performance as the calculating husband. The 3D staging attracts attention, though the reviews differ on how consistently it works. Grace Kelly draws praise from several critics, but the Evening Standard finds her miscast and sees the inventive camerawork as the chief attraction. The reservations concern stage-bound presentation and uneven set pieces rather than a failure to generate tension.

Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

Hitchcock took on the adaptation of Frederick Knott's play mainly to fulfil a contract and showed little enthusiasm for it. Despite some flat 3D set pieces, there are deft directorial touches and strong performances from Ray Milland and Grace Kelly.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 June 2011 · Rob Humanick
80*

The critic finds Dial M for Murder one of Hitchcock’s most purely enjoyable films despite its stage-bound origins. The direction of performers and the intimate exchanges between characters are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
23 July 2013 · ★★★★ · Guy Lodge
80

The 3D restoration highlights inventive spatial interplay in this chatty murder mystery despite its theatrical roots. The airtight plot generates strong suspense even while withholding little from the audience.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
26 July 2013
50*

The innovative 3D camera-work is now the thriller's main selling point in this re-release. Ray Milland is great as the cold husband but Grace Kelly is miscast as the wife.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 March 2006 · David Parkinson

The film is one of Hitchcock's most bleakly amusing despite his own reservations about it. It reveals much about his approach to filmmaking through its technical challenges and use of 3D and colour.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 May 1954 · John McCarten

The film is a smooth confection changed little from the stage play. Ray Milland is convincingly pathological, Grace Kelly makes a sympathetic figure, and the piece becomes grimly diverting once the murder wheels are set in motion.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
29 May 1954 · Bosley Crowther

Hitchcock turns Frederick Knott's one-set play into a sleek thriller of coils twining with evil. Ray Milland is excitingly effectual as the machinating husband, Grace Kelly does a nice job as the wife, and the film is vividly pictorial.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1953

The melodramatics have been transferred virtually intact but are not as impressive on film, remaining more of a filmed play than a motion picture. Performances and Hitchcock's suspense tricks gloss over basic weaknesses but not enough to rate it a cinch winner.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
25 July 2013 · Jennie Kermode
80*

Hitchcock excels by tightening a stage play into a confined-space thriller, using close details of action and expression to heighten subtexts and the characters' sense of being trapped. The result is a clever, socially aware film that builds tension through relationships and power dynamics, making it an absolute must for fans despite not being among his most famous works.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate