Film review

Dial M for Murder

1954 · Directed by Alfred Hitchcock · 1h 45m · MPA PG

In a sentenceRay Milland discusses murder with the calm of a man booking a table

ThrillerCrimeDrama

Tony Wendice (Ray Milland) is a husband plotting murder, with his wife Margot (Grace Kelly) at the centre of his calculations. The people around them include Mark Halliday (Robert Cummings), Charles Swann (Anthony Dawson) and Chief Inspector Hubbard (John Williams). Within a confined domestic setting, Tony tries to control events and the people involved, while the audience is allowed to understand much of his thinking. Conversations carry the preparations forward, and what each person knows becomes a source of danger. Alfred Hitchcock directs from Frederick Knott’s screenplay, adapted from Knott’s stage play.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Alfred Hitchcock’s confined murder thriller is precise, nasty and thoroughly enjoyable, with Ray Milland making a persuasive schemer. Some stiff stretches of explanation survive, but the actors make the long conversations worth listening to.

Dial M for Murder asks us to spend a good deal of time listening to a man who believes he can arrange other people’s lives to suit himself. Alfred Hitchcock makes this an excellent confined-space thriller, though its appetite for explanation occasionally tests our patience. Frederick Knott’s screenplay retains the conversational business of his stage play, and the director sees little reason to send everyone outdoors. The interest is in who controls each exchange and how comfortably the others let him.

Ray Milland’s Tony Wendice gives those conversations their unpleasant attraction. As the scheming husband, he is convincing without asking us to enjoy a grand display of wickedness. We felt uneasy watching how little strain Milland allows into the intimate exchanges. The calculation is there, but it does not interrupt the social ease, and that is what makes him frightening. Hitchcock gives us enough knowledge of Tony’s thinking for us to watch the people around him with growing concern.

Grace Kelly, as Tony’s wife Margot, gives us someone to worry about while we are busy following his calculations. Her performance is sympathetic, and its restraint works within the film’s formal manner. Not every exchange sounds spontaneous; there are passages when the actors seem obliged to make sure we have understood the arrangement before they can continue. Kelly is more persuasive when the attention rests on her response to another person than when the scene has information to deliver.

Robert Burks’s cinematography makes the restricted space worth looking at. The use of 3D encourages us to notice the distances between people, rather than treating the setting as a neutral place to record dialogue. Close details of action and expression help us follow pressures that the spoken exchanges do not always acknowledge. The staging can still feel flat in places, but confinement mostly suits a story in which people are trying to manage one another.

Rudi Fehr’s editing keeps the extended explanations legible, although their length occasionally works against the suspense. There are stretches when we have grasped the point and are still waiting for the conversation to finish. Dimitri Tiomkin’s music supports the unease, but contributes less to our enjoyment than the timing between the actors. We would happily lose some of the explanation to spend longer watching them assess one another; Hitchcock’s direction of these encounters is assured enough to make the extra clarification feel unnecessary.

As a murder thriller, this is unusually willing to let us understand the schemer instead of making ignorance do all the work. That choice gives the conversations tension even when there is no immediate surprise to spring, and makes the occasional labour of following the plot worthwhile. The theatrical origins remain visible, but Hitchcock’s handling of faces and space gives the film plenty to justify the change of medium. Watch it for Milland, provided an evening of attentive listening sounds like a pleasure rather than homework.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

5 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
0

With only 5 reviews in so far, most critics find Hitchcock’s thriller suspenseful despite its theatrical confines. Praise centres on the tightly worked plot, his handling of intimate exchanges and Ray Milland’s performance as the calculating husband. The 3D staging attracts attention, though the reviews differ on how consistently it works. Grace Kelly draws praise from several critics, but the Evening Standard finds her miscast and sees the inventive camerawork as the chief attraction. The reservations concern stage-bound presentation and uneven set pieces rather than a failure to generate tension.

Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

Hitchcock took on the adaptation of Frederick Knott's play mainly to fulfil a contract and showed little enthusiasm for it. Despite some flat 3D set pieces, there are deft directorial touches and strong performances from Ray Milland and Grace Kelly.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 June 2011 · Rob Humanick
80*

The critic finds Dial M for Murder one of Hitchcock’s most purely enjoyable films despite its stage-bound origins. The direction of performers and the intimate exchanges between characters are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
23 July 2013 · ★★★★ · Guy Lodge
80

The 3D restoration highlights inventive spatial interplay in this chatty murder mystery despite its theatrical roots. The airtight plot generates strong suspense even while withholding little from the audience.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
26 July 2013
50*

The innovative 3D camera-work is now the thriller's main selling point in this re-release. Ray Milland is great as the cold husband but Grace Kelly is miscast as the wife.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 March 2006 · David Parkinson

The film is one of Hitchcock's most bleakly amusing despite his own reservations about it. It reveals much about his approach to filmmaking through its technical challenges and use of 3D and colour.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 May 1954 · John McCarten

The film is a smooth confection changed little from the stage play. Ray Milland is convincingly pathological, Grace Kelly makes a sympathetic figure, and the piece becomes grimly diverting once the murder wheels are set in motion.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Rope poster

Rope

1948 · Another confined Hitchcock thriller, with social conversation made steadily more uncomfortable.

Les Diaboliques poster

Les Diaboliques

1955 · A French murder scheme whose careful preparation offers remarkably little reassurance.

Sleuth poster

Sleuth

1972 · For more elaborately staged malice between people who enjoy explaining themselves.

A Simple Plan poster86

A Simple Plan

1998 · Ordinary people discover how much work a supposedly manageable crime requires.

The Handmaiden poster85

The Handmaiden

2016 · An intimate Korean thriller where manipulation depends on watching other people closely.