Critics’ reviews

Die Hard: With a Vengeance (1995)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 59: 3 positive, 3 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Die Hard: With a Vengeance

59
Positive
3
Mixed
3
Negative
3

The reviews are evenly divided between positive, mixed and negative, but praise clusters around the stunt work, Manhattan set pieces and the testy pairing of Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson. Even some detractors acknowledge the action’s physical impact, while warmer assessments find enough energy and humour to make the spectacle satisfying. Jackson is a particular asset, earning approval even from critics who find the surrounding formula tired.

The main divide is over whether the larger, city-wide adventure refreshes the series or sacrifices its tension and coherence. Collider sees a revitalised sequel that preserves the original’s desperation and humour; Time Out finds familiar chases and explosions with little originality. Reservations recur around the scattered plotting and loss of momentum towards the finish, with even Collider calling the ending rushed and anticlimactic. Jeremy Irons’s villain also divides opinion: some enjoy his presence, while others find him wanting beside the original’s antagonist.

Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

Positive take on the third Die Hard as cracking entertainment. Singles out Jeremy Irons as a strong villain and the testy Willis-Jackson pairing for their quips and action chemistry.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 May 1995 · Roger Ebert
75*

The film is a cleverly made wind-up action toy delivered with high energy that delivers just what it advertises. It stands out for its sensational stunt sequences and set pieces around Manhattan.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
22 May 1995 · Terrence Rafferty
65*

It is passable fun and pretty good value for fans of dumb action-movie hedonism, though sloppier than the original. It stands out for nifty sequences like the reckless cab drive and tense elevator shoot-out.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
60*

The film is a buddy-buddy romp better than Die Hard 2 but not as good as the original, with breathless fun that runs out of steam in the last act and a villain inferior to Alan Rickman's.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 May 1995 · Peter Rainer
60*

The installment is a grand-scale demolition derby on steroids that relentlessly zeros in on sensation. It stands out for its non-stop explosions and beat-the-clock escapades all over New York.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · DW
40*

Finds the formula wearing thin by the third film, with Willis as a standard action hero and little originality beyond familiar chases and bangs. Singles out Samuel L. Jackson for providing the best moments as the sidekick.

Read the full review →
Variety
18 May 1995 · Brian Lowry
40*

An overinflated mishmash that is the least accomplished of the three movies with a scattered and indecipherable plotline. It stands out for spectacular stunt-work and sound effects that provide much of the visceral appeal.

Read the full review →
The Independent
19 August 1995
30*

The script self-destructs and the series runs out of steam, with an episodic plot across New York that lacks the claustrophobia of prior entries and a pale villain compared to the first film's.

Read the full review →
Collider
13 February 2013 · A- · Matt Goldberg
90

The critic considers it the true sequel to the original, bigger and bolder while retaining desperation, humor, and intensity, with strong praise for the buddy pairing of Willis and Jackson and the revitalized formula. The ending is called anticlimactic and rushed.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate