Critics’ reviews

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)

26 reviews from 26 publications. Critics’ score 64: 15 positive, 6 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness

64
Positive
15
Mixed
6
Negative
5
Slant Magazine
3 May 2022 · ★★★★/4 · Jake Cole
100

This psychedelic, horror-strewn romp is the MCU’s new high-water mark, seizing the multiverse material with giddy exuberance missing since Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy. No MCU movie has so thoroughly displayed the personality and artistry of its director.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
3 May 2022 · B+ · David Ehrlich
83

Sam Raimi delivers a violent, wacky funhouse of a film that nudges the MCU somewhere actually new. It is a drag-me-to-several-different-hells-at-once ride that saves the franchise from itself.

Read the full review →
Empire
3 May 2022 · ★★★★ · Dan Jolin
80

Raimi returns with a noisy, frantic, and entertaining ride full of jump scares, inventive set pieces, fan-pleasing cameos, and a high body count that lives up to its title. Strong performances from Cumberbatch and Olsen anchor the MCU’s most deranged and energetic entry yet.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 May 2022 · Justin Chang
80*

Raimi's return brings playful, ghoulish and exuberantly grotesque energy with freaky horror flourishes. The film delivers an enjoyable, scarier Marvel sequel full of witchy doings and evil twins.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
80

The film offers exhilarating action, jaw-dropping cameos and Raimi’s signature macabre visuals in a psychedelic multiverse adventure. It requires prior knowledge of WandaVision and can feel overloaded by future plot threads, though the post-credits scene delivers a strong payoff.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
3 May 2022 · Christina Newland
75*

Cumberbatch’s smug, likable sorcerer anchors a kaleidoscopic adventure through alternate realities filled with inventive magical action sequences. Raimi brings welcome chaos and dark-witchcraft energy, though it occasionally veers into goofiness and excessive lore.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
4 May 2022 · ★★★☆☆ · Danny Leigh
70*

Raimi is allowed a creative signature, delivering a family-friendly take on horror chills close to his earlier work. Cumberbatch’s spry performance holds the movie together amid the dead weight of assumed knowledge.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
3 May 2022
70*

Raimi’s fingerprints make this the funkiest and most peculiar MCU entry, blending horror, B-movie schlock and irreverence with spectacle. The critic highlights the pulpy intensity, darker violence and Olsen’s complex portrayal of Wanda, which sells an unexpectedly touching ending.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
4 May 2022 · Kim Newman
70*

Raimi brings an Evil Dead spirit and inventive multiverse visuals to the MCU, creating a spectacular if occasionally chaotic trip. The critic singles out Elizabeth Olsen’s raw emotional performance as Wanda for elevating the film’s themes of responsibility and regret.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 May 2022 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

The critic finds the multiverse concept handled with cheerful humour and boisterous surreal melodrama rather than stoner seriousness. Raimi brings a lite-scary action aesthetic to the sequel, with entertaining scenes of the characters whizzing through varied realities.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
3 May 2022 · John DeFore
70*

The film is a little more ordinary than its director/material match promises but enough fun to wish for more Raimi-style exploits in the MCU. The last act plays to the director's strengths with a looser, more kinetic and occasionally goofy tone despite the stakes.

Read the full review →
Total Film
6 May 2022 · ★★★
60

There are enough crowd-pleasing moments, Raimi flourishes, and callbacks to reward the faithful, with Cumberbatch remaining enjoyable. The film rarely feels like the best possible outcome of this director-character pairing, hampered by weightless CGI and underserved strands.

Read the full review →
Variety
3 May 2022 · Owen Gleiberman
60*

The head-trip sequel is an unhinged CGI horror jam and Marvel brainteaser that is both entertaining and exhausting. Alternate versions and multiplying storylines sand down character appeal without locating an emotional core.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 May 2022 · A.O. Scott
50*

The critic finds the film mostly ordinary Marvel fare with fan-service surprises rather than genuine wonder. Sam Raimi injects occasional horror elements into the mystic mumbo-jumbo.

Read the full review →
The Independent
3 May 2022 · ★★ · Clarisse Loughrey
40

The film is a total mess overloaded with exposition, lore, and MacGuffins that undercuts its multiverse premise, reducing it to cameos and fan service. Raimi’s horror and comic-book flourishes are present but feel tacked on to a structurally and emotionally hollow MCU product.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
10 May 2022 · Richard Brody
30*

The sequel trims away whimsy to fit the Marvel franchise formula, resulting in a conservative and corporate slog. Raimi's horror touches are used superficially amid facile destruction scenes.

Read the full review →
The Times
6 May 2022 · ★★☆☆☆ · Kevin Maher
30*

The film is seen as another water-treading exercise from Marvel that reveals how difficult it has been for the franchise to regroup after Endgame. It borrows multiverse themes and cameos from recent entries but lacks feelgood pizzazz.

Read the full review →
Vulture
4 May 2022
30*

Marvel has hemmed in Raimi's craft, resulting in a disappointing film that is gamified and leeched of color. The story is held together with bubblegum and a prayer, and the sexist conception of Wanda leaves the critic more disenchanted than ever.

Read the full review →
Deadline
3 May 2022 · Pete Hammond
80*

The critic praises Sam Raimi's horror-infused take on the MCU film, noting it mixes dark storytelling with beloved characters effectively. They single out Elizabeth Olsen's commanding performance as the Scarlet Witch for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
3 May 2022 · ★★★★ · Don Kaye
80

The critic praises it as a wild, weird, and ambitious MCU entry with Sam Raimi's horror style, highlighting Elizabeth Olsen's performance as Wanda. It notes some shaggy elements but overall a rich, off-the-wall film.

Read the full review →
NME
3 May 2022 · Paul Bradshaw
80*

It's a head-spinning, high-energy adventure that's fun, scary, visually bombastic and mad, with Raimi bringing cartoon charm, though stakes feel low and it can be numbing.

Read the full review →
/Film
3 May 2022 · 7.5/10 · Hoai-Tran Bui
75

The critic finds the film a horror-tinged but somewhat muted Sam Raimi Marvel movie that delivers gory and macabre moments along with a fun ride despite its bridge-building purpose. Raimi's influence shows in the brutality and visuals, though it doesn't fully reach the promised madness.

Read the full review →
Polygon
3 May 2022 · Susana Polo
65*

The critic highlights Raimi's inventive visuals and body-horror elements as the standout features while criticizing the film's failure to meaningfully develop Doctor Strange's character beyond his established flaws.

Read the full review →
Collider
3 May 2022 · C+ · Ross Bonaime
63

The critic praises Raimi's distinctive horror-infused direction and visual style as the film's strongest elements but faults its overreliance on hollow MCU fan service and multiverse gimmicks that undermine narrative coherence.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
3 May 2022 · Alonso Duralde
50*

The review finds the film heavy on spectacle but light on humanity and character depth, though it praises Raimi's visual flair and some trippy sequences.

Read the full review →
Paste
20 May 2022 · Brianna Zigler
35*

The critic notes occasional flashes of Raimi's signature style amid the MCU formula but finds the film incoherent, overly dependent on prior series, and ultimately disappointing due to weak character motivations and excessive cameos.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate