Critics’ reviews

Dogville (2003)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 60: 4 positive, 3 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Dogville

60
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
2

The reviews lean towards admiration, but agreement is limited. Praise centres on von Trier’s bare-stage setting and stripped-down theatrical approach, which supporters find well suited to a fable about exploitation and human cruelty. Nicole Kidman and the ensemble draw frequent praise for giving the deliberately artificial setting emotional force. For the more enthusiastic critics, the minimal scenery makes the town’s behaviour more disturbing rather than keeping it at a distance.

Reservations cluster around the length, repetition and heavy-handed allegory, with several critics finding the drama contrived or short on insight. The spread is wide: even the performances and staging that persuade supporters strike some detractors as monotonous or gimmicky. The political reading is also disputed. The New Yorker condemns a condescending attack on American values, while Radio Times sees a broader study of human frailty and explicitly rejects the anti-American reading.

Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

Von Trier creates a defiantly stylised picture on a bare sound stage with an excellent ensemble cast led by Nicole Kidman. It offers a sobering study in human frailty that is not anti-American.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
19 May 2003 · festival review
75*

Dogville is a bold, uncompromising experiment in stripped-down narrative and theatrical execution that explores the disappointments of human nature. It is a must-see arthouse provocation that will divide audiences, with Von Trier remaining an original talent.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 February 2004 · ★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
60

The critic finds Dogville a technically accomplished Brechtian experiment with strong performances from Kidman and others but ultimately an exasperating, contrived shaggy-dog story lacking emotional depth or real insight into its subject.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 March 2004 · A. O. Scott
60*

The review examines the film's minimalist staging and its portrayal of small-town America as a site of hypocrisy and cruelty, noting the director's deliberate avoidance of realism to deliver a pointed moral fable.

Read the full review →
Time Out
30 August 2012 · GA
55*

The film is an ambitious but fatally self-important account of a small town's hypocrisy and intolerance toward a woman seeking refuge. It praises the strong performances and the wicked glee of the final scene while criticizing the repetitive, overlong drama and gimmicky Brechtian style.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
9 April 2004 · Roger Ebert
35*

The critic finds the bare-stage concept intriguing but faults the execution as pedantic and overly long, turning a potentially strong idea into a tedious slog through heavy-handed allegory.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
22 March 2004 · David Denby
20*

The critic dismisses the film as obtuse and dislikable avant-gardism, criticizing its schematic allegory, monotonous performances, and condescending attack on American values.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Alan Morrison

The critic praises von Trier's daring theatrical style, likening it to Brecht, while noting that the film's stripped-down sets and intrusive camerawork create a uniquely cinematic intensity. It singles out the performances and the moral depth of the narrative as making Dogville a great work in the didactic stage tradition.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
25 March 2004

The piece describes Dogville as a trying masterpiece that showcases von Trier's idealism and invention through its provocative style and themes.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
27 September 2003 · Ed Gonzalez

The critic views Dogville as a Brechtian critique of oppression and human cruelty rather than strictly anti-American, praising its minimalist staging and universal themes drawn from European theater traditions.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
23 March 2004 · Scott Tobias

The critic praises von Trier as a peerless dramatist for the film's abstract minimalist staging and emotional intensity, noting it works as Christian allegory and comment on exploitation beyond a narrow anti-American reading.

Read the full review →
The Times

The review highlights the film's unsettling, provocative nature as a fable exposing human darkness and the exploitation of vulnerability, noting its stylistic boldness alongside its discomforting elements.

Read the full review →
Variety
19 May 2003 · festival review · Todd McCarthy

The review describes the bare-stage experiment as an ideologically apocalyptic blast at American values that is obvious in intent but murky in achievement, likely to provoke strong reactions on the festival circuit.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 February 2004 · Angus Wolfe Murray
85*

The review praises the film's bold theatrical staging on a bare stage and its incisive dissection of human nature as a powerful allegory. It singles out Nicole Kidman's luminous performance as Grace and John Hurt's narration for making the long fable compelling and psychologically accurate.

Read the full review →
Paste
29 December 2003 · Robert Davis
80*

The critic finds Dogville clinically ironic yet unique, inspired and quite sublime, with its stripped-bare fairy-tale style and minimal set standing out. The film is seen as thought-provoking, potentially offering a self-critique by von Trier amid its layers of irony and allegory.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate