Critics’ reviews

Downfall (2004)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 82: 7 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Downfall

82
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Most critics respond strongly to Downfall’s detailed reconstruction of life in Hitler’s bunker and its account of the regime’s collapse. Praise centres on Bruno Ganz, whose performance makes Hitler recognisably human without softening his cruelty or delusion. The reviews repeatedly find that attention to his ordinary behaviour makes him more disturbing, not more sympathetic. The ensemble and the accumulation of mundane bunker detail also contribute to a portrait widely described as gripping and chilling.

The reservations concern what all that reconstruction achieves dramatically, with a wider spread of opinion here than on the acting. The New York Times finds fascination in the details but insufficient dramatic or emotional payoff. Sight and Sound similarly questions the film’s perspective, finding a historical checklist where it wants greater emotional engagement. Elsewhere, objections to crowded subplots and conventional drama qualify the praise rather than overturn it.

Empire
· Kim Newman
85*

Hirschbiegel's epic is solid history and fine cinema, gripping, moving and profoundly horrifying in its portrayal of the bunker and the Reich's final collapse. It singles out Bruno Ganz's great performance as Hitler for its shocking conviction and exacting detail.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
1 April 2005 · Peter Bradshaw
85*

The critic praises the film's intimate portrayal of Hitler's final days in the bunker, which humanises the dictator in a way that makes him appear even more grotesque and banal. Bruno Ganz's performance as Hitler is singled out as exceptionally authentic and compelling.

Read the full review →
The Times
31 March 2005 · James Christopher
85*

The critic calls the film a remarkable and chilling first German account of Hitler in 50 years, commending its intense, authentic reconstruction of the bunker's final days. Bruno Ganz's eerily perfect portrayal of the Führer, based on real tapes and footage, is highlighted as a standout.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
15 February 2005 · Nathan Rabin
80*

The film creates a visceral sense of a corrupt old order being ripped apart, boasting ghoulish gallows humor and memorable performances amid an overstuffed melodrama with countless subplots.

Read the full review →
The Independent
31 March 2005
80*

The film disturbingly and magnificently portrays Hitler as human rather than a monster. It singles out Bruno Ganz's compelling performance for praise, along with the film's focus on the bunker through Traudl Junge's eyes and its honest depiction of the regime's collapse.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
28 January 2005 · Ed Gonzalez
70*

The film is an exhausting soap opera of doom that conveys a chilling vision of rats being slowly flushed down a toilet, yet Hirschbiegel tempers scorn with compassion for the complex levels of defeat among Hitler's minions.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 February 2005 · Kenneth Turan

The film demands attention for its detailed portrayal of Hitler's final days and the regime's collapse, though it is more conventional mainstream drama than high art.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
15 September 2004 · festival review

The critic affirms that the film answers the need for another Hitler drama with its non-sensationalistic approach and human-level history, singling out Bruno Ganz's powerful and complex performance for praise while noting it encourages understanding without judgment.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Richard Falcon

The critic praises Bruno Ganz's brilliant, haunting performance as Hitler but faults the film for lacking a coherent perspective or emotional engagement, treating the material more as a comprehensive historical checklist than a dramatically compelling work.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
7 February 2005 · David Denby

Bruno Ganz's performance as Hitler is a staggering acting achievement that humanizes the dictator, but the film as a whole is more reassuring than artistically bold in its approach to history.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 February 2005 · A. O. Scott

The film is fascinating in its mundane details of bunker life and the collapse around it but ultimately lacks dramatic or emotional payoff despite strong performances.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· WH

The review recommends the film as a masterclass in reconstructive cinema that is dramatically compelling, highlighting its sound design and Bruno Ganz's superb humanization of Hitler, while noting the director's awareness of modern German sensibilities in certain scenes.

Read the full review →
Variety
15 September 2004 · festival review · Derek Elley

A powerful and cumulatively gripping portrait of the final days in the bunker, anchored by Bruno Ganz's commanding performance as Hitler and strong ensemble work, though its humanistic approach may spark debate.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
31 March 2005 · Angus Wolfe Murray
90*

The film is an astonishing piece of filmmaking that recreates the chaos of the Third Reich's final days with clarity and unsentimentality. Bruno Ganz's masterful portrayal of a diminished, paranoid Hitler stands out as the central achievement.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate