Critics’ reviews

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964)

10 reviews from 10 publications. We need six from publications we count before we show a critics’ score; there are 4 so far.

Back to our review of Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

4 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
100

Kubrick's ferocious Cold War satire makes viewers smile through gritted teeth as it spirals from gentle humour to surreal horror. Sellers' performances and the unsparing disgust with warlike instincts make it grimly comic.

Read the full review →
Time Out
21 October 2016 · ★★★★★
100

Kubrick's most perfectly realised film weds his cynical vision of technology and human stupidity with sparkling comedy. The result is scary, hilarious and nightmarishly beautiful, far more effective than anti-nuke documentaries.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
15 January 1964 · James Powers
90*

The critic calls the film baleful and brilliant, predicting it will enthrall most viewers as a huge success for its truthful humor about nuclear anxiety. Kubrick is praised for skillfully using comedy to convey a serious point, with standout performances from Peter Sellers in three roles and strong technical contributions.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 June 2009 · Eric Henderson
85*

The review affirms the film's lasting status as a confirmation of Kubrick's reputation and the arrival of irreverent satire, highlighting its zippy, ruthless portrait of diplomatic insanity. It singles out the savage satire of the military-industrial complex through character performances and the iconic phallic imagery of the bomb-riding scene.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Dorian Lynskey

The critic praises Kubrick's decision to treat the absurd logic of nuclear deterrence as black comedy rather than earnest thriller, highlighting the film's lewd satire, innuendo and Peter Sellers' three standout performances. It notes the boldness of the bad taste even decades later and calls the result the film the subject deserved.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
15 May 2019 · Tom Milne

The critic calls the film a very tough yet hilariously funny and nightmarish work that makes no concessions. Kubrick is praised as a cunning director whose vision exposes the madness behind sane exteriors in power politics and ends with a bitter warning.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
15 May 2019 · Peter Bradshaw

The critic calls the film a queasy nuclear holocaust satire whose power has not diminished on re-release. Sellers' multi-role performance, especially as the ex-Nazi Strangelove, is singled out for praise alongside the absurd war-room satire and final mushroom-cloud sequence.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
25 January 1964 · Brendan Gill

The critic calls it one of the best pictures seen in years and a brilliant nightmare comedy that induces laughter at the prospect of nuclear extinction. He singles out the sharp satire, factual details, and Peter Sellers' multiple performances for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
12 December 2014

The review highlights the film's surreal Cold War comedy of errors and Peter Sellers' brilliant triple performance. It notes that the satire on warmongering machismo retains its bite decades later.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 January 1964 · Dave Kaufman

The review praises Kubrick for skillfully turning a sensitive nuclear holocaust topic into a sharply satirical comedy with suspense and laughs. It highlights Peter Sellers' excellent trio of roles and George C. Scott's strong performance as standout elements.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate